Paleocon
Legend
We spent 50 Years fighting the USSR just to become a gay, retarded version of It.
Posts: 7,338
|
Post by Paleocon on Oct 16, 2024 21:00:23 GMT
I had a thousand pieces of evidence against the minuscule verbal scraps that you could produce. I was dousing every match you lit with a fire hose, leaving you all wet. Right after that thread, you left the forum entirely. Running away was the act of the real loser. I never left the ring, loser. You should have pointed to all that evidence, then. The world needs to know. Would have been better then just waiving your hands and whining! I left the forum in 2022, the monuments thread was started in 2020. You have a real, real, real big problem with basic facts.
All despite the fact that the message on the actual monuments refutes every word! They were bloody POLITICIANS! Think Trump's mouth 120 years ago.
Like the Declarations of Causes that you cling to, your evidence is so thin that it's becoming transparent. But keep at it; it's fun to watch leftists scurry about to try to prop up their little fantasies with tiny crumbs from history.
That's from the thread in question, and there's me pointing out that evidence. None of the Confederate monuments permanently reflected in writing or depiction any of the temporary rhetoric spewed at dedication ceremonies. Why stupidly pretend that words lost in the wind are comparable to what the monuments actually said?
And it's "waving", not "waiving". And you did disappear from the forum in 2020.
|
|
|
|
Post by RinsePrius on Oct 16, 2024 21:08:25 GMT
You should have pointed to all that evidence, then. The world needs to know. Would have been better then just waiving your hands and whining! I left the forum in 2022, the monuments thread was started in 2020. You have a real, real, real big problem with basic facts.
All despite the fact that the message on the actual monuments refutes every word! They were bloody POLITICIANS! Think Trump's mouth 120 years ago.
Like the Declarations of Causes that you cling to, your evidence is so thin that it's becoming transparent. But keep at it; it's fun to watch leftists scurry about to try to prop up their little fantasies with tiny crumbs from history.
That's from the thread in question, and there's me pointing out that evidence. None of the Confederate monuments permanently reflected in writing or depiction any of the temporary rhetoric spewed at dedication ceremonies. Why stupidly pretend that words lost in the wind are comparable to what the monuments actually said?
And it's "waving", not "waiving". And you did disappear from the forum in 2020.
Your posts amount to nothing but outright denial of basic facts. That's all you have. My "I gotta go" thread was started in 2022. I just looked at it. Facts exist, you don't get to simply make them up to suit your own needs. |
|
|
|
Post by Fiddler on Oct 16, 2024 21:57:46 GMT
And you've been fuming about it ever since, pacing & shouting at anyone walking by who might listen. Sore loser status unlocked. LMAO.. Hilarious .. The stupid mudderfucker is like a street preacher .. What a rube..
|
|
thor
Legend
Posts: 20,480
|
Post by thor on Oct 16, 2024 22:08:18 GMT
It's like Pickett's Charge, on an endless loop. Paleo hasn't figured out a 'break' statement yet. On the subject of the War Between the States, you'll always lose, and it doesn't matter if you have a half dozen behind you or not.
It takes facts to win on that subject and neither you nor TL have anything that hasn't been refuted and debunked.
Anytime you want to give it a try, boy, I'll be here.
Start another thread....the beatdown will commence.  |
|
thor
Legend
Posts: 20,480
|
Post by thor on Oct 16, 2024 22:14:11 GMT
And you've been fuming about it ever since, pacing & shouting at anyone walking by who might listen. Sore loser status unlocked.  You knew it was coming....  |
|
|
|
Post by Fiddler on Oct 16, 2024 22:18:16 GMT
LMAO.. You idiot.. .. You were left in a puddle bruised and bleeding on the field .. You were whining like the Black Knight in Holy Grail ..
You were down to the point that you were regurgitating the same debunked bullshit over and over .. You thought you could control the narrative by ignoring direct quotes from multiple Confederate leaders.. by ignoring official Confederate documents.. by ignoring dedications made by Confederate supporters at the opening of those memorials..
By the end of the thread you were pasted simply being a laughing stock and were full on pitied as the vile piece of shit you are . ..
Spoken like the victim of a truly brutal ass kicking. As usual, you were little more than the water boy for the losing team. Oh fucking bullshit.. I've kicked your ignorant slaver ass across 3 forums using nothing but the words from your traitorous ancestors.. Yes.. It was delightful to watch two other well informed, articulate members systemically pound facts up your loser ass .. You went down like petep on Trump's mushroom dick ..
|
|
thor
Legend
Posts: 20,480
|
Post by thor on Oct 16, 2024 22:20:55 GMT
And you've been fuming about it ever since, pacing & shouting at anyone walking by who might listen. Sore loser status unlocked. LMAO.. Hilarious .. The stupid mudderfucker is like a street preacher .. What a rube..
 |
|
Paleocon
Legend
We spent 50 Years fighting the USSR just to become a gay, retarded version of It.
Posts: 7,338
|
Post by Paleocon on Oct 17, 2024 12:18:33 GMT
What a joke. If anyone is clinging to a "predetermined narrative", it's those who pull obscure, and yes, anecdotal, paragraphs from a handful of speeches and assign those tidbits as the overarching motivation and intent behind the thousands of monuments erected! Yeah, that actually is as stupid as it sounds.
All despite the fact that the message on the actual monuments refutes every word! They were bloody POLITICIANS! Think Trump's mouth 120 years ago.
Like the Declarations of Causes that you cling to, your evidence is so thin that it's becoming transparent. But keep at it; it's fun to watch leftists scurry about to try to prop up their little fantasies with tiny crumbs from history.
That's from the thread in question, and there's me pointing out that evidence. None of the Confederate monuments permanently reflected in writing or depiction any of the temporary rhetoric spewed at dedication ceremonies. Why stupidly pretend that words lost in the wind are comparable to what the monuments actually said?
And it's "waving", not "waiving". And you did disappear from the forum in 2020.
Your posts amount to nothing but outright denial of basic facts. That's all you have. My "I gotta go" thread was started in 2022. I just looked at it. Facts exist, you don't get to simply make them up to suit your own needs. That's funny, because making up facts is what you seem to do. And I'll admit being wrong on your departure date if you provide a link, but "I gotta go" is not the same as ceasing to participate, which you did do shortly after your loss on the Confederate Memorial thread.
Let's put this to bed, shall we. If Confederate Monuments were about white supremacy, that theme would be part of the engravings and depictions on the monuments themselves. Not a single one meets that requirement.
The rhetoric from the dedication speeches only lasted about two minutes before the wind wiped away a filthy politicians empty words. The monuments, while saying nothing about white supremacy to anyone, have been in place for over a century.
THOSE are the basic facts.
|
|
|
|
Post by RinsePrius on Oct 17, 2024 12:24:50 GMT
Your posts amount to nothing but outright denial of basic facts. That's all you have. My "I gotta go" thread was started in 2022. I just looked at it. Facts exist, you don't get to simply make them up to suit your own needs. That's funny, because making up facts is what you seem to do. And I'll admit being wrong on your departure date if you provide a link, but "I gotta go" is not the same as ceasing to participate, which you did do shortly after your loss on the Confederate Memorial thread.
Let's put this to bed, shall we. If Confederate Monuments were about white supremacy, that theme would be part of the engravings and depictions on the monuments themselves. Not a single one meets that requirement.
The rhetoric from the dedication speeches only lasted about two minutes before the wind wiped away a filthy politicians empty words. The monuments, while saying nothing about white supremacy to anyone, have been in place for over a century.
THOSE are the basic facts.
You had nothing to say when shown secession speeches, declarations & ordinances and when it came to statistical studies on when and where the monuments were built, what was on them and then finally, what was said during many of the dedication speeches, you similarly had no response. Mountains of evidence piled on our side. Nothing but hand waving & denial in response. And the entire board saw it, commented on it and moved on. Those are the basic facts that you can't escape from because we were all there and saw it and can re-read it again if we want. |
|
|
|
Post by RinsePrius on Oct 17, 2024 12:30:14 GMT
The idea that I left the board in 2022 because I made some good points 2 years prior in a rando thread is dumb.
You want to know why I left? I started having my LNF friends turn on me as I developed new opinions and things got personal. That's my cue to duck out.
You were never in that club, Paleo.
|
|
|
|
Post by rabbitreborn on Oct 17, 2024 12:30:54 GMT
It's not fear-mongering if MAGA is factually guilty of what is being laid at their feet. It's not fearmongering if they really are Nazis? Now, we don't need the actual proof comparing them to the actual atrocities of the Nazis, but if we believe it really hard then it's not fearmongering. On the other side of the ledger, turns out hurricane steering is a myth, egg prices are governed by the law of supply and demand, and FEMA is not denying aid to republicans. Also an elite group of pedophiles are not controlling everything, the earth isn't flat, and Jewish billionaires are not trying to poison the blood of the nation. "The World will end in 12 years". There's so little time to save the world before it's destroyed. It will no longer be "habitable for our kids and grandchildren." If only they had more money in DC and in State capitols across the country. Is there anything more fearmonger-y than the literal end of the world? There are so many more if you need more examples on climate fearmongering. UKRAINE AND THE RUSSIAN WORLD TAKEOVERwww.reuters.com/world/europe/russia-may-be-ready-attack-nato-5-8-years-german-official-says-2024-04-18/www.ft.com/content/b3101099-9516-4b0b-92c6-179997d7e4cfwww.newsweek.com/volodymyr-zelensky-vladimir-putin-russia-possible-nato-attack-1720327The lies about who blew up Nord Stream... www.cbsnews.com/news/ukraine-russia-nord-stream-pipelines-biden-sabotage/time.com/6218125/russia-gas-pipelines-energy-war/www.politico.com/news/2022/09/28/nord-stream-pipeline-explosions-eu-00059262You think the US intelligence really believed that Russia blew up its own pipeline? It never made sense. COVIDDemocrats and "liberals" were significantly and irrationally frightened by COVID, with most believing that the hospitalization rate was over 30% and 40% believing that the hospitalization rate was over 50%. Completely wrong. Coincidence? They were never told this specifically, yet somehow democrats/"liberals" believed this to be the case. Perhaps the fearmongering is more subtle, I guess? But it's really not. It's transparent. news.gallup.com/opinion/gallup/354938/adults-estimates-covid-hospitalization-risk.aspxI'm even reminded of something towardliberty said at the end of 2021: Yeah.. here's the problem with that. The virus is morphing to become more of a threat to ever healthier people... Yikes. That was simply not true in December of 2021. Omicron was starting to spread in November of 2021. And that was significantly less deadly than all previous strains. RACIST POLICESimilarly, Democrats/"Liberals" have an extraordinarily distorted view of violence against unarmed black men. This is fearmongering, to achieve political power. www.skeptic.com/research-center/reports/Research-Report-CUPES-007.pdfWith huge swaths of Democrats/"Liberals" believing that unarmed black men are being killed by police in the thousands every year. Conservatives are far more accurate at labeling the correct number, which is usually between 10-15. Wonder where they got those ideas from? NET NEUTRALITYwww.usatoday.com/story/opinion/2017/09/29/ending-net-neutrality-will-end-internet-we-know-steve-wozniak-michael-copps-column/704861001/thehill.com/homenews/media/364959-cnn-headline-declares-end-of-the-internet-as-we-know-it-after-net-neutrality/x.com/SenSanders/status/941383879939837953I mean, I could go on all day about the lies the Establishment Left has embraced with the purpose of gaining political power. Russia gate, the Covington Catholic kid with the "punchable face", race hoaxes that are immediately reported by the media as evidence of increasing racial tension, the fire extinguishers and near-rape and murder of AOC at January 6th, etc. etc. And the right has lies too. Pretending it's different or all on one side is silly and naive. |
|
|
|
Post by RinsePrius on Oct 17, 2024 12:40:27 GMT
It's not fear-mongering if MAGA is factually guilty of what is being laid at their feet. It's not fearmongering if they really are Nazis? Now, we don't need the actual proof comparing them to the actual atrocities of the Nazis, but if we believe it really hard then it's not fearmongering. On the other side of the ledger, turns out hurricane steering is a myth, egg prices are governed by the law of supply and demand, and FEMA is not denying aid to republicans. Also an elite group of pedophiles are not controlling everything, the earth isn't flat, and Jewish billionaires are not trying to poison the blood of the nation. "The World will end in 12 years". There's so little time to save the world before it's destroyed. It will no longer be "habitable for our kids and grandchildren." If only they had more money in DC and in State capitols across the country. Is there anything more fearmonger-y than the literal end of the world? There are so many more if you need more examples on climate fearmongering. UKRAINE AND THE RUSSIAN WORLD TAKEOVERwww.reuters.com/world/europe/russia-may-be-ready-attack-nato-5-8-years-german-official-says-2024-04-18/www.ft.com/content/b3101099-9516-4b0b-92c6-179997d7e4cfwww.newsweek.com/volodymyr-zelensky-vladimir-putin-russia-possible-nato-attack-1720327The lies about who blew up Nord Stream... www.cbsnews.com/news/ukraine-russia-nord-stream-pipelines-biden-sabotage/time.com/6218125/russia-gas-pipelines-energy-war/www.politico.com/news/2022/09/28/nord-stream-pipeline-explosions-eu-00059262You think the US intelligence really believed that Russia blew up its own pipeline? It never made sense. COVIDDemocrats and "liberals" were significantly and irrationally frightened by COVID, with most believing that the hospitalization rate was over 30% and 40% believing that the hospitalization rate was over 50%. Completely wrong. Coincidence? They were never told this specifically, yet somehow democrats/"liberals" believed this to be the case. Perhaps the fearmongering is more subtle, I guess? But it's really not. It's transparent. news.gallup.com/opinion/gallup/354938/adults-estimates-covid-hospitalization-risk.aspxI'm even reminded of something towardliberty said at the end of 2021: Yeah.. here's the problem with that. The virus is morphing to become more of a threat to ever healthier people... Yikes. That was simply not true in December of 2021. Omicron was starting to spread in November of 2021. And that was significantly less deadly than all previous strains. RACIST POLICESimilarly, Democrats/"Liberals" have an extraordinarily distorted view of violence against unarmed black men. This is fearmongering, to achieve political power. www.skeptic.com/research-center/reports/Research-Report-CUPES-007.pdfWith huge swaths of Democrats/"Liberals" believing that unarmed black men are being killed by police in the thousands every year. Conservatives are far more accurate at labeling the correct number, which is usually between 10-15. Wonder where they got those ideas from? NET NEUTRALITYwww.usatoday.com/story/opinion/2017/09/29/ending-net-neutrality-will-end-internet-we-know-steve-wozniak-michael-copps-column/704861001/thehill.com/homenews/media/364959-cnn-headline-declares-end-of-the-internet-as-we-know-it-after-net-neutrality/x.com/SenSanders/status/941383879939837953I mean, I could go on all day about the lies the Establishment Left has embraced with the purpose of gaining political power. Russia gate, the Covington Catholic kid with the "punchable face", race hoaxes that are immediately reported by the media as evidence of increasing racial tension, the fire extinguishers and near-rape and murder of AOC at January 6th, etc. etc. And the right has lies too. Pretending it's different or all on one side is silly and naive. I don't recall arguing that the left or Democrats never have messaging that points to fearful outcomes, or looming crisis. Do I defend it all? No. But I would push back and say these are real concerns: climate, covid, the Ukraine war, & systemic racism/injustice. Reasonable people can disagree on what to do about them but we are not making up issues here and there's no attempt to reduce these complex problems to simple evil stories about some enemy within. |
|
|
|
Post by rabbitreborn on Oct 17, 2024 13:30:18 GMT
It's not fearmongering if they really are Nazis? Now, we don't need the actual proof comparing them to the actual atrocities of the Nazis, but if we believe it really hard then it's not fearmongering. CLIMATEwww.latimes.com/opinion/story/2022-04-08/us-climate-action-end-fossil-fuelsthehill.com/policy/energy-environment/426353-ocasio-cortez-the-world-will-end-in-12-years-if-we-dont-address/"The World will end in 12 years". There's so little time to save the world before it's destroyed. It will no longer be "habitable for our kids and grandchildren." If only they had more money in DC and in State capitols across the country. Is there anything more fearmonger-y than the literal end of the world? There are so many more if you need more examples on climate fearmongering. UKRAINE AND THE RUSSIAN WORLD TAKEOVERwww.reuters.com/world/europe/russia-may-be-ready-attack-nato-5-8-years-german-official-says-2024-04-18/www.ft.com/content/b3101099-9516-4b0b-92c6-179997d7e4cfwww.newsweek.com/volodymyr-zelensky-vladimir-putin-russia-possible-nato-attack-1720327The lies about who blew up Nord Stream... www.cbsnews.com/news/ukraine-russia-nord-stream-pipelines-biden-sabotage/time.com/6218125/russia-gas-pipelines-energy-war/www.politico.com/news/2022/09/28/nord-stream-pipeline-explosions-eu-00059262You think the US intelligence really believed that Russia blew up its own pipeline? It never made sense. COVIDDemocrats and "liberals" were significantly and irrationally frightened by COVID, with most believing that the hospitalization rate was over 30% and 40% believing that the hospitalization rate was over 50%. Completely wrong. Coincidence? They were never told this specifically, yet somehow democrats/"liberals" believed this to be the case. Perhaps the fearmongering is more subtle, I guess? But it's really not. It's transparent. news.gallup.com/opinion/gallup/354938/adults-estimates-covid-hospitalization-risk.aspxI'm even reminded of something towardliberty said at the end of 2021: Yikes. That was simply not true in December of 2021. Omicron was starting to spread in November of 2021. And that was significantly less deadly than all previous strains. RACIST POLICESimilarly, Democrats/"Liberals" have an extraordinarily distorted view of violence against unarmed black men. This is fearmongering, to achieve political power. www.skeptic.com/research-center/reports/Research-Report-CUPES-007.pdfWith huge swaths of Democrats/"Liberals" believing that unarmed black men are being killed by police in the thousands every year. Conservatives are far more accurate at labeling the correct number, which is usually between 10-15. Wonder where they got those ideas from? NET NEUTRALITYwww.usatoday.com/story/opinion/2017/09/29/ending-net-neutrality-will-end-internet-we-know-steve-wozniak-michael-copps-column/704861001/thehill.com/homenews/media/364959-cnn-headline-declares-end-of-the-internet-as-we-know-it-after-net-neutrality/x.com/SenSanders/status/941383879939837953I mean, I could go on all day about the lies the Establishment Left has embraced with the purpose of gaining political power. Russia gate, the Covington Catholic kid with the "punchable face", race hoaxes that are immediately reported by the media as evidence of increasing racial tension, the fire extinguishers and near-rape and murder of AOC at January 6th, etc. etc. And the right has lies too. Pretending it's different or all on one side is silly and naive. I don't recall arguing that the left or Democrats never have messaging that points to fearful outcomes, or looming crisis. Do I defend it all? No. But I would push back and say these are real concerns: climate, covid, the Ukraine war, & systemic racism/injustice. Reasonable people can disagree on what to do about them but we are not making up issues here and there's no attempt to reduce these complex problems to simple evil stories about some enemy within. Immigration is a real concern. As are things like birth rate collapse, crime, lockdowns, vaccine mandates, etc. I suppose if you get to define what is "real" and worthy of fearmongering that it does seem as though only the other side is fearmongering about stuff that isn't real. The world isn't ending in 12 years. Also, the world isn't flat, to use one of your previous examples that I'm unsure how applies at all. Or is of any real concern. Does anybody of any influence worry flat earth? Is that fear mongering? Why is that a better example of fearmongering than a congresswoman saying the world is going to end in 12 years? |
|
|
|
Post by RinsePrius on Oct 17, 2024 13:36:12 GMT
I don't recall arguing that the left or Democrats never have messaging that points to fearful outcomes, or looming crisis. Do I defend it all? No. But I would push back and say these are real concerns: climate, covid, the Ukraine war, & systemic racism/injustice. Reasonable people can disagree on what to do about them but we are not making up issues here and there's no attempt to reduce these complex problems to simple evil stories about some enemy within. Immigration is a real concern. As are things like birth rate collapse, crime, lockdowns, vaccine mandates, etc. I suppose if you get to define what is "real" and worthy of fearmongering that it does seem as though only the other side is fearmongering about stuff that isn't real. The world isn't ending in 12 years. Also, the world isn't flat, to use one of your previous examples that I'm unsure how applies at all. Or is of any real concern. Does anybody of any influence worry flat earth? Is that fear mongering? Why is that a better example of fearmongering than a congresswoman saying the world is going to end in 12 years? Yes, I agree it is. What I don't believe is real is the idea that we are being invaded, or that some hidden hand is importing immigrants to poison the blood, or that some "enemy within" is weaponizing immigration. But I agree immigration concerns have something to them that fears of fake elections, hurricane steering & microchips in vaccines don't, and by that I am referring to realism. I am just throwing flat earth in because it's funny and strangely rightwing, if statistically tiny. |
|
|
|
Post by rabbitreborn on Oct 17, 2024 13:45:17 GMT
Immigration is a real concern. As are things like birth rate collapse, crime, lockdowns, vaccine mandates, etc. I suppose if you get to define what is "real" and worthy of fearmongering that it does seem as though only the other side is fearmongering about stuff that isn't real. The world isn't ending in 12 years. Also, the world isn't flat, to use one of your previous examples that I'm unsure how applies at all. Or is of any real concern. Does anybody of any influence worry flat earth? Is that fear mongering? Why is that a better example of fearmongering than a congresswoman saying the world is going to end in 12 years? Yes, I agree it is. What I don't believe is real is the idea that we are being invaded, or that some hidden hand is importing immigrants to poison the blood, or that some "enemy within" is weaponizing immigration. Why would immigration suddenly spike to unprecedented levels immediately upon a switch from Trump to Biden? I have no firm thoughts on "invasion" or "hidden hand importing immigrants", but you can see how the trend I provided earlier would make it easy for people to believe it is deliberate, if not carefully coordinated and planned in secret. Maybe it only takes a few minor changes to how illegal immigrants are handled and discharged to change the flow of illegal immigration from a steady trickle to a flood. I would tell my fellow right wingers that a smokey backroom is completely unnecessary. But I also don't blame them, given the statistics, for thinking it is deliberate. The evidence would indicate that somebody 4 years ago really wanted to increase that flow. Do you have a better explanation? |
|
|
|
Post by RinsePrius on Oct 17, 2024 13:56:50 GMT
Yes, I agree it is. What I don't believe is real is the idea that we are being invaded, or that some hidden hand is importing immigrants to poison the blood, or that some "enemy within" is weaponizing immigration. Why would immigration suddenly spike to unprecedented levels immediately upon a switch from Trump to Biden? I have no firm thoughts on "invasion" or "hidden hand importing immigrants", but you can see how the trend I provided earlier would make it easy for people to believe it is deliberate, if not carefully coordinated and planned in secret. Maybe it only takes a few minor changes to how illegal immigrants are handled and discharged to change the flow of illegal immigration from a steady trickle to a flood. I would tell my fellow right wingers that a smokey backroom is completely unnecessary. But I also don't blame them, given the statistics, for thinking it is deliberate. The evidence would indicate that somebody 4 years ago really wanted to increase that flow. Do you have a better explanation? I think the folks who believe that it is a weaponized outcome, on net, get that view from an article or video pushing the narrative. It is perfect clickbait. To answer the question of why it happened, my guess it is the intersection of 3 forces: 1) expectations of more lenient policies from the new administration 2) changes in Latin American countries themselves 3) the changes the Biden admin made to immigration policy These aren't in any particular order. |
|
|
|
Post by rabbitreborn on Oct 17, 2024 14:13:01 GMT
Why would immigration suddenly spike to unprecedented levels immediately upon a switch from Trump to Biden? I have no firm thoughts on "invasion" or "hidden hand importing immigrants", but you can see how the trend I provided earlier would make it easy for people to believe it is deliberate, if not carefully coordinated and planned in secret. Maybe it only takes a few minor changes to how illegal immigrants are handled and discharged to change the flow of illegal immigration from a steady trickle to a flood. I would tell my fellow right wingers that a smokey backroom is completely unnecessary. But I also don't blame them, given the statistics, for thinking it is deliberate. The evidence would indicate that somebody 4 years ago really wanted to increase that flow. Do you have a better explanation? I think the folks who believe that it is a weaponized outcome, on net, get that view from an article or video pushing the narrative. It is perfect clickbait. To answer the question of why it happened, my guess it is the intersection of 3 forces: 1) expectations of more lenient policies from the new administration 2) changes in Latin American countries themselves 3) the changes the Biden admin made to immigration policy These aren't in any particular order. I can't disagree. But to hold that view and then be dismissive or accuse people of crazy conspiracy theories because they think it's a deliberate tactic to increase the flow of immigration I find puzzling. It's natural to see that a massive and unprecedented flood of immigration immediately upon a new administration begs people to think it's deliberate. |
|
Paleocon
Legend
We spent 50 Years fighting the USSR just to become a gay, retarded version of It.
Posts: 7,338
|
Post by Paleocon on Oct 17, 2024 14:21:47 GMT
Spoken like the victim of a truly brutal ass kicking. As usual, you were little more than the water boy for the losing team. Oh fucking bullshit.. I've kicked your ignorant slaver ass across 3 forums using nothing but the words from your traitorous ancestors.. Yes.. It was delightful to watch two other well informed, articulate members systemically pound facts up your loser ass .. You went down like petep on Trump's mushroom dick ..
Oh, you poor little cock holster, you don't have a clue how roughly you've been handled, do you? You can't lie your way out of your losses or pretend that you ever had a chance, boy. |
|
Paleocon
Legend
We spent 50 Years fighting the USSR just to become a gay, retarded version of It.
Posts: 7,338
|
Post by Paleocon on Oct 17, 2024 14:50:15 GMT
That's funny, because making up facts is what you seem to do. And I'll admit being wrong on your departure date if you provide a link, but "I gotta go" is not the same as ceasing to participate, which you did do shortly after your loss on the Confederate Memorial thread. Let's put this to bed, shall we. If Confederate Monuments were about white supremacy, that theme would be part of the engravings and depictions on the monuments themselves. Not a single one meets that requirement. The rhetoric from the dedication speeches only lasted about two minutes before the wind wiped away a filthy politicians empty words. The monuments, while saying nothing about white supremacy to anyone, have been in place for over a century. THOSE are the basic facts.
You had nothing to say when shown secession speeches, declarations & ordinances and when it came to statistical studies on when and where the monuments were built, what was on them and then finally, what was said during many of the dedication speeches, you similarly had no response. Mountains of evidence piled on our side. Nothing but hand waving & denial in response. And the entire board saw it, commented on it and moved on. Those are the basic facts that you can't escape from because we were all there and saw it and can re-read it again if we want. That's not an honest assessment of what happened, but I don't expect honesty from any liberal.
I have refuted the flawed, biased and perverted logic used by Northern narrative zealots like you on all of those topics. I've made these two irrefutable point that: A) If Confederate Monuments were about white supremacy, that theme would be part of the engravings and depictions on the monuments themselves. Not a single Confederate monument meets that requirement.
B) The rhetoric from the dedication speeches only lasted about two minutes before the wind wiped away a filthy politicians empty words. And what did you do in the post above? Hand waving and denial rather than addressing those points.
You can do better than that, TL. Don't be like thor and Fiddler. We already have enough leftist animals on this forum without adding another volunteer.
|
|
Paleocon
Legend
We spent 50 Years fighting the USSR just to become a gay, retarded version of It.
Posts: 7,338
|
Post by Paleocon on Oct 17, 2024 15:02:49 GMT
The idea that I left the board in 2022 because I made some good points 2 years prior in a rando thread is dumb. You want to know why I left? I started having my LNF friends turn on me as I developed new opinions and things got personal. That's my cue to duck out. You were never in that club, Paleo. Still waiting on those "good points" you claim to have made. Once again, your presentism caused you to miss the many complexities that refuted your original idea on that thread. |
|
