|
|
Post by FEZZILLA on Mar 24, 2021 7:25:39 GMT
I like how atheists pretend to understand geology while denying the proof for the Flood. So I figure why not open an entertaining topic exposing the ignorance of atheists. Should be easy.
The Flood has ancient witnesses.
Maine fossils have been found in all the highest mountain tops in the world, including Mt.Everest.
Several whale fossils have been found up in the Andes mountains.
The fossils are found in sedimentary rock. That makes perfect sense if one accepts the Flood.
But if one wants to entertain the lie that an asteroid did it, then we shouldn't find any fossils at all, especially in the K-Pg blast zone.
|
|
|
|
Post by Fiddler on Mar 24, 2021 13:04:16 GMT
Indeed.. Yet another subject in which your insecurities compel you to demonstrate your ignorance..
We are truly and wonderfully blessed.
|
|
|
|
Post by Mercy for All on Mar 24, 2021 15:08:01 GMT
I like how atheists pretend to understand geology while denying the proof for the Flood. So I figure why not open an entertaining topic exposing the ignorance of atheists. Should be easy. The Flood has ancient witnesses. Maine fossils have been found in all the highest mountain tops in the world, including Mt.Everest. Several whale fossils have been found up in the Andes mountains. The fossils are found in sedimentary rock. That makes perfect sense if one accepts the Flood. But if one wants to entertain the lie that an asteroid did it, then we should find any fossils at all, especially in the K-Pg blast zone. How is this "operational science"? |
|
|
|
Post by FEZZILLA on Mar 24, 2021 22:44:53 GMT
I like how atheists pretend to understand geology while denying the proof for the Flood. So I figure why not open an entertaining topic exposing the ignorance of atheists. Should be easy. The Flood has ancient witnesses. Maine fossils have been found in all the highest mountain tops in the world, including Mt.Everest. Several whale fossils have been found up in the Andes mountains. The fossils are found in sedimentary rock. That makes perfect sense if one accepts the Flood. But if one wants to entertain the lie that an asteroid did it, then we should find any fossils at all, especially in the K-Pg blast zone. How is this "operational science"? It was observed by witnesses. Its recorded in all ancient history. There is geological proof to back eye witness accounts. Some geological proof are marine fossils in mountain peaks. There are whale fossils also found in the mountains. The fossils are found in sedimentary rock which is exactly what we would expect to find if the Flood happened. All real evidence strongly supports the Flood. |
|
|
|
Post by atreyu on Mar 24, 2021 22:58:52 GMT
How is this "operational science"? It was observed by witnesses. Its recorded in all ancient history. There is geological proof to back eye witness accounts. Some geological proof are marine fossils in mountain peaks. There are whale fossils also found in the mountains. The fossils are found in sedimentary rock which is exactly what we would expect to find if the Flood happened. All real evidence strongly supports the Flood.
Where did all the water go?
|
|
|
|
Post by Mercy for All on Mar 24, 2021 23:45:48 GMT
How is this "operational science"? It was observed by witnesses. Its recorded in all ancient history. There is geological proof to back eye witness accounts. Some geological proof are marine fossils in mountain peaks. There are whale fossils also found in the mountains. The fossils are found in sedimentary rock which is exactly what we would expect to find if the Flood happened. All real evidence strongly supports the Flood. What you wouldn't expect to find is layers in which "simpler" animals are underneath "more complex" animals, regardless of size. They are not laid down by size but by "apparent date" (like...what you might expect if fossils are laid down over really long periods of time). |
|
|
|
Post by FEZZILLA on Mar 25, 2021 0:35:45 GMT
It was observed by witnesses. Its recorded in all ancient history. There is geological proof to back eye witness accounts. Some geological proof are marine fossils in mountain peaks. There are whale fossils also found in the mountains. The fossils are found in sedimentary rock which is exactly what we would expect to find if the Flood happened. All real evidence strongly supports the Flood. What you wouldn't expect to find is layers in which "simpler" animals are underneath "more complex" animals, regardless of size. They are not laid down by size but by "apparent date" (like...what you might expect if fossils are laid down over really long periods of time). Yes, what you said proves the Flood. For if you believe uniformitarianism then the fossil record must be absolutely uniform to the theory with not a single exception. Ironically, the fossil record does not support uniformitarianism. There are many misplaced fossils and living fossils that discredit uniformitarianism. The general order of the fossil record favors the slowest moving creatures in the earlier layers on up to the faster moving creatures in later layers. And, dinosaurs and mammal fossils are found lumped together in fossil graveyards--again, in sedimentary rock. No fossil should be found in sedimentary rock if the asteroid did it. Sedimentary rock is mainly caused by the erosive force of water that rapidly buries living things in the earth where it becomes a fossil. Though during the Flood, volcanoes would have also been a factor which explains why some fossils in some regions are found buried in lava. The whole earth was under water. If you were a land creature not on the ark, then you only survived by floating on drift wood. Most land creatures not on the ark did not survive. |
|
|
|
Post by Mercy for All on Mar 25, 2021 1:24:37 GMT
What you wouldn't expect to find is layers in which "simpler" animals are underneath "more complex" animals, regardless of size. They are not laid down by size but by "apparent date" (like...what you might expect if fossils are laid down over really long periods of time). Yes, what you said proves the Flood. For if you believe uniformitarianism then the fossil record must be absolutely uniform to the theory with not a single exception. Ironically, the fossil record does not support uniformitarianism. There are many misplaced fossils and living fossils that discredit uniformitarianism. The general order of the fossil record favors the slowest moving creatures in the earlier layers on up to the faster moving creatures in later layers. And, dinosaurs and mammal fossils are found lumped together in fossil graveyards--again, in sedimentary rock. No fossil should be found in sedimentary rock if the asteroid did it. Sedimentary rock is mainly caused by the erosive force of water that rapidly buries living things in the earth where it becomes a fossil. Though during the Flood, volcanoes would have also been a factor which explains why some fossils in some regions are found buried in lava. The whole earth was under water. If you were a land creature not on the ark, then you only survived by floating on drift wood. Most land creatures not on the ark did not survive. No, you either misunderstood or ignored what I posted. |
|
|
|
Post by FEZZILLA on Mar 25, 2021 22:07:53 GMT
Yes, what you said proves the Flood. For if you believe uniformitarianism then the fossil record must be absolutely uniform to the theory with not a single exception. Ironically, the fossil record does not support uniformitarianism. There are many misplaced fossils and living fossils that discredit uniformitarianism. The general order of the fossil record favors the slowest moving creatures in the earlier layers on up to the faster moving creatures in later layers. And, dinosaurs and mammal fossils are found lumped together in fossil graveyards--again, in sedimentary rock. No fossil should be found in sedimentary rock if the asteroid did it. Sedimentary rock is mainly caused by the erosive force of water that rapidly buries living things in the earth where it becomes a fossil. Though during the Flood, volcanoes would have also been a factor which explains why some fossils in some regions are found buried in lava. The whole earth was under water. If you were a land creature not on the ark, then you only survived by floating on drift wood. Most land creatures not on the ark did not survive. No, you either misunderstood or ignored what I posted. If that's the case then please learn how to make yourself clear. Don't worry so much on being rhetorically fancy. Just keep your arguments simple to understand so that nobody misunderstands what you say. Other than that, this topic is collecting crickets so far. I thought atheists here wanted this topic. I provide them a simple opening defense for the Flood, nothing long winded, and now all I hear is crickets. |
|
|
|
Post by FEZZILLA on Mar 26, 2021 5:51:30 GMT
Where's all the atheists on this topic? I thought atheists wanted to debate the Flood. I guess this topic is too scientific for atheists to handle. I guess maybe you atheists agree with my points then? Yeah...most evolutionists are becoming much more accepting of the Global Flood since they can't explain the fossil record without it.
Lots of crickets on this topic.
|
|
|
|
Post by Fiddler on Mar 26, 2021 14:47:24 GMT
I thought atheists wanted to debate the Flood. What's to debate.? There is no geologic evidence of a global flood.
However myths about a global flood do show up in several ancient cultures. Simple minds attempting to explain complex occurrences.
The biblical version is taken from earlier Babylonian flood myths.
|
|
|
|
Post by atreyu on Mar 26, 2021 16:42:30 GMT
Where's all the atheists on this topic? I thought atheists wanted to debate the Flood. I guess this topic is too scientific for atheists to handle. I guess maybe you atheists agree with my points then? Yeah...most evolutionists are becoming much more accepting of the Global Flood since they can't explain the fossil record without it. Lots of crickets on this topic.
Where did all the water go?
It's hard to debate on something that didn't happen.
|
|
|
|
Post by Mercy for All on Mar 26, 2021 18:49:53 GMT
No, you either misunderstood or ignored what I posted. If that's the case then please learn how to make yourself clear. Don't worry so much on being rhetorically fancy. Just keep your arguments simple to understand so that nobody misunderstands what you say. Other than that, this topic is collecting crickets so far. I thought atheists here wanted this topic. I provide them a simple opening defense for the Flood, nothing long winded, and now all I hear is crickets. I might be offended by that if not for your consistent and demonstrable misinterpretation. The fossil record is not layered by "size." It's not layered by "locomotive ability of organisms." It's laid down according to what might be expected by evolutionary development. You don't see rodents beside trilobites. You don't see mastodons beside triceratops. You don't see eohippi beside great danes. Why not? Because it didn't happen through a giant flood. Hope that's clear enough. |
|
|
|
Post by Fiddler on Mar 26, 2021 18:57:27 GMT
Where's all the atheists on this topic? I thought atheists wanted to debate the Flood. I guess this topic is too scientific for atheists to handle. I guess maybe you atheists agree with my points then? Yeah...most evolutionists are becoming much more accepting of the Global Flood since they can't explain the fossil record without it. Lots of crickets on this topic.
Where did all the water go?
Fish drank it.
|
|
|
|
Post by FEZZILLA on Mar 27, 2021 1:04:37 GMT
If that's the case then please learn how to make yourself clear. Don't worry so much on being rhetorically fancy. Just keep your arguments simple to understand so that nobody misunderstands what you say. Other than that, this topic is collecting crickets so far. I thought atheists here wanted this topic. I provide them a simple opening defense for the Flood, nothing long winded, and now all I hear is crickets. I might be offended by that if not for your consistent and demonstrable misinterpretation. The fossil record is not layered by "size." It's not layered by "locomotive ability of organisms." It's laid down according to what might be expected by evolutionary development. You don't see rodents beside trilobites. You don't see mastodons beside triceratops. You don't see eohippi beside great danes. Why not? Because it didn't happen through a giant flood. Hope that's clear enough. Here again you spout theory but the fossils do not obey theory. Misplaced fossils discredit the theory. In order for uniformitarism to be true, there cannot be any misplaced fossils. There are plenty of misplaced fossils. The fossils are arranged exactly as Flood geologists expected them to be. The proof is found in all the marine fossils found at the peaks of mountains. That's Checkmate# |
|
|
|
Post by CadesCove on Mar 27, 2021 1:13:00 GMT
I might be offended by that if not for your consistent and demonstrable misinterpretation. The fossil record is not layered by "size." It's not layered by "locomotive ability of organisms." It's laid down according to what might be expected by evolutionary development. You don't see rodents beside trilobites. You don't see mastodons beside triceratops. You don't see eohippi beside great danes. Why not? Because it didn't happen through a giant flood. Hope that's clear enough. Here again you spout theory but the fossils do not obey theory. Misplaced fossils discredit the theory. In order for uniformitarism to be true, there cannot be any misplaced fossils. There are plenty of misplaced fossils. The fossils are arranged exactly as Flood geologists expected them to be. The proof is found in all the marine fossils found at the peaks of mountains. That's Checkmate# Next. www.nationalgeographic.org/encyclopedia/fossil/#:~:text=Fossils%20of%20ancient%20marine%20animals%20called%20ammonites%20have,Himalayas%20were%20at%20the%20bottom%20of%20the%20ocean. |
|
|
|
Post by FEZZILLA on Mar 27, 2021 1:15:10 GMT
Where's all the atheists on this topic? I thought atheists wanted to debate the Flood. I guess this topic is too scientific for atheists to handle. I guess maybe you atheists agree with my points then? Yeah...most evolutionists are becoming much more accepting of the Global Flood since they can't explain the fossil record without it. Lots of crickets on this topic.
Where did all the water go?
It's hard to debate on something that didn't happen.
Evolutionists and creationists both accept Pangaea. This was a supercontinent that broke apart after_____(fill in the blank). As a result of the Flood, landmass rapidly eroded, land bridges collapsed into the ocean, and water dominated the surface of our planet. We have large ocean basins because of the Flood. But if we were to rise up those ocean basis to pre-Flood levels, melt the ice caps, the whole world would be Flooded again. But since the aftermath of the Flood caused such deep ocean basins, no such Flood will ever happen again as God promised. The Flood has ancient witnesses. Maine fossils have been found in all the highest mountain tops in the world, including Mt.Everest. Several whale fossils have been found up in the Andes mountains. The fossils are found in sedimentary rock. That makes perfect sense if one accepts the Flood. |
|
|
|
Post by FEZZILLA on Mar 27, 2021 1:25:08 GMT
I noticed you had to spout theory and posted a link which means you really don't understand geoscience. So let me ask a question or two. When did these creatures become fossils and what caused them to become fossils? Lets start there. |
|
|
|
Post by atreyu on Mar 27, 2021 1:44:02 GMT
Where did all the water go?
It's hard to debate on something that didn't happen.
Evolutionists and creationists both accept Pangaea. This was a supercontinent that broke apart after_____(fill in the blank). As a result of the Flood, landmass rapidly eroded, land bridges collapsed into the ocean, and water dominated the surface of our planet. We have large ocean basins because of the Flood. But if we were to rise up those ocean basis to pre-Flood levels, melt the ice caps, the whole world would be Flooded again. But since the aftermath of the Flood caused such deep ocean basins, no such Flood will ever happen again as God promised. The Flood has ancient witnesses. Maine fossils have been found in all the highest mountain tops in the world, including Mt.Everest. Several whale fossils have been found up in the Andes mountains. The fossils are found in sedimentary rock. That makes perfect sense if one accepts the Flood.
So the water didn't go anywhere, the earth shrank to hold all the water, while also adding land bridges under the water further raising the water level.
You can't seriously believe the shit you're spewing.
Alright I'll bite, where did all the "earth" go since the amount of water has stayed the same?
|
|
|
|
Post by FEZZILLA on Mar 27, 2021 1:51:53 GMT
Evolutionists and creationists both accept Pangaea. This was a supercontinent that broke apart after_____(fill in the blank). As a result of the Flood, landmass rapidly eroded, land bridges collapsed into the ocean, and water dominated the surface of our planet. We have large ocean basins because of the Flood. But if we were to rise up those ocean basis to pre-Flood levels, melt the ice caps, the whole world would be Flooded again. But since the aftermath of the Flood caused such deep ocean basins, no such Flood will ever happen again as God promised. The Flood has ancient witnesses. Maine fossils have been found in all the highest mountain tops in the world, including Mt.Everest. Several whale fossils have been found up in the Andes mountains. The fossils are found in sedimentary rock. That makes perfect sense if one accepts the Flood.
So the water didn't go anywhere, the earth shrank to hold all the water, while also adding land bridges under the water further raising the water level.
You can't seriously believe the shit you're spewing.
Alright I'll bite, where did all the "earth" go since the amount of water has stayed the same?
I never said the earth shrank. Stop lying and debate this academically. Can you do that or are you too dumb and uneducated to debate properly? |
|
