RWB
Legend
Posts: 12,751
|
Post by RWB on Nov 16, 2024 15:53:19 GMT
|
|
petep
Legend
Posts: 25,941
Member is Online
|
Post by petep on Nov 16, 2024 18:15:40 GMT
That would be good news for all. Certainly much better than the Biden Harris just ignore problems approach. |
|
|
|
Post by MojoJojo on Nov 16, 2024 18:32:09 GMT
That would be good news for all. Certainly much better than the Biden Harris just ignore problems approach. What, exactly, was so bad about Biden's approach to Russia's invasion of Ukraie? |
|
petep
Legend
Posts: 25,941
Member is Online
|
Post by petep on Nov 16, 2024 18:34:32 GMT
That would be good news for all. Certainly much better than the Biden Harris just ignore problems approach. What, exactly, was so bad about Biden's approach to Russia's invasion of Ukraie? Hmmm. I’d start by asking why do you supposed Putin seized crimea under Obama / Biden. Then waited for Biden Harris to be in office to launch a full scale invasion. We all know what the world authoritarians were doing pre trump. During trump. And post trump. The trump years were very much relatively calm compared the the last three plus years. |
|
|
|
Post by MojoJojo on Nov 16, 2024 18:37:53 GMT
What, exactly, was so bad about Biden's approach to Russia's invasion of Ukraie? Hmmm. I’d start by asking why do you supposed Putin seized crimea under Obama / Biden. Then waited for Biden Harris to be in office to launch a full scale invasion. We all know what the world authoritarians were doing pre trump. During trump. And post trump. The trump years were very much relatively calm compared the the last three plus years. Set aside Super Turmp's amazing powers for a second and answer the question if possible. What could/should Biden have done differently? |
|
RWB
Legend
Posts: 12,751
|
Post by RWB on Nov 16, 2024 20:06:52 GMT
Hmmm. I’d start by asking why do you supposed Putin seized crimea under Obama / Biden. Then waited for Biden Harris to be in office to launch a full scale invasion. We all know what the world authoritarians were doing pre trump. During trump. And post trump. The trump years were very much relatively calm compared the the last three plus years. Set aside Super Turmp's amazing powers for a second and answer the question if possible. What could/should Biden have done differently? the biden/harris administration should of been trying to get both sides together instead of escalating the war by giving Ukraine weapons to use against Russia. For some reason democrats get a boner over death. |
|
thor
Legend
Posts: 20,391
Member is Online
|
Post by thor on Nov 16, 2024 20:24:50 GMT
Set aside Super Turmp's amazing powers for a second and answer the question if possible. What could/should Biden have done differently? the biden/harris administration should of been trying to get both sides together instead of escalating the war by giving Ukraine weapons to use against Russia. For some reason democrats get a boner over death. LOLZ! Russia attacked Kyiv directly. Because they wanted the whole enchilada, you dumb fuck. You are Exhibit 'A' of the Cuckification of the American Right.  |
|
petep
Legend
Posts: 25,941
Member is Online
|
Post by petep on Nov 16, 2024 20:31:56 GMT
Hmmm. I’d start by asking why do you supposed Putin seized crimea under Obama / Biden. Then waited for Biden Harris to be in office to launch a full scale invasion. We all know what the world authoritarians were doing pre trump. During trump. And post trump. The trump years were very much relatively calm compared the the last three plus years. Set aside Super Turmp's amazing powers for a second and answer the question if possible. What could/should Biden have done differently? Been trump There is not a sole that doesn’t consider Biden Harris weak. They are in so far in over their heads. Every authoritarian knows this. They are simply the wrong people to have been in charge. Whatever trump did the first time around - diplomacy combined with a knowledge that he is not a pushover - kept people in line. |
|
petep
Legend
Posts: 25,941
Member is Online
|
Post by petep on Nov 16, 2024 20:33:55 GMT
Set aside Super Turmp's amazing powers for a second and answer the question if possible. What could/should Biden have done differently? Been trump There is not a sole that doesn’t consider Biden Harris weak. They are in so far in over their heads. Every authoritarian knows this. They are simply the wrong people to have been in charge. Whatever trump did the first time around - diplomacy combined with a knowledge that he is not a pushover - kept people in line. When Biden was running and he kept challenging people to push ups or saying to another let’s go to a parking lot (as if to fight) I thought holy crap this guy is so pathetically weak. Strong people don’t talk like that. Only weak people do. He was telegraphing to every authoritarian just how weak he is. |
|
|
|
Post by RinsePrius on Nov 16, 2024 21:58:57 GMT
So no policy change. Just be "not weak."
Okay silly goose.
|
|
|
|
Post by HolyMoly on Nov 16, 2024 22:19:45 GMT
I have a feeling that Zelensky may not like the way that Donny
plans to end the war.
|
|
thor
Legend
Posts: 20,391
Member is Online
|
Post by thor on Nov 16, 2024 22:42:10 GMT
Set aside Super Turmp's amazing powers for a second and answer the question if possible. What could/should Biden have done differently? Been trump There is not a sole that doesn’t consider Biden Harris weak. They are in so far in over their heads. Every authoritarian knows this. They are simply the wrong people to have been in charge. Whatever trump did the first time around - diplomacy combined with a knowledge that he is not a pushover - kept people in line. Who was President during the Kerch Straits incident, PP? |
|
DaveJavu
Legend
Posts: 4,373
Member is Online
|
Post by DaveJavu on Nov 16, 2024 22:49:45 GMT
Been trump There is not a sole that doesn’t consider Biden Harris weak. They are in so far in over their heads. Every authoritarian knows this. They are simply the wrong people to have been in charge. Whatever trump did the first time around - diplomacy combined with a knowledge that he is not a pushover - kept people in line. Who was President during the Kerch Straits incident, PP? Congratulations, you've found a way to shut him up. |
|
|
|
Post by Lomelis on Nov 16, 2024 23:16:27 GMT
That would be good news for all. Certainly much better than the Biden Harris just ignore problems approach. What, exactly, was so bad about Biden's approach to Russia's invasion of Ukraie? It was predictable and weak. It was a riding the fence approach providing enough weaponry and intelligence to keep them from being completely overrun but not providing enough to effectively push Russia out early in the war. There hasn't been enough pressure on either side to come to the table to negotiate and there has been an unwillingness to negotiate directly with Russia about Ukrainian entry into NATO. I'm not sure if people are really paying attention to what's going on over there right now but Ukrainian is losing along the eastern lines. Russia is steadily taking eastern Ukraine a mile at a time and Ukraine has a massive manpower shortage. It can't get enough people to fight. www.reuters.com/world/europe/russia-took-196-square-km-ukraine-last-week-agentstvo-media-says-2024-10-29/deepstatemap.live/en#8/49.2552575/35.5847168The map can be used to watch how Russia has been picking Ukraine apart. |
|
thor
Legend
Posts: 20,391
Member is Online
|
Post by thor on Nov 16, 2024 23:36:13 GMT
What, exactly, was so bad about Biden's approach to Russia's invasion of Ukraie? It was predictable and weak. It was a riding the fence approach providing enough weaponry and intelligence to keep them from being completely overrun but not providing enough to effectively push Russia out early in the war. There hasn't been enough pressure on either side to come to the table to negotiate and there has been an unwillingness to negotiate directly with Russia about Ukrainian entry into NATO. I'm not sure if people are really paying attention to what's going on over there right now but Ukrainian is losing along the eastern lines. Russia is steadily taking eastern Ukraine a mile at a time and Ukraine has a massive manpower shortage. It can't get enough people to fight. www.reuters.com/world/europe/russia-took-196-square-km-ukraine-last-week-agentstvo-media-says-2024-10-29/deepstatemap.live/en#8/49.2552575/35.5847168The map can be used to watch how Russia has been picking Ukraine apart. Looks like you couldn't read a map, either, Shitbag. No wonder you failed so bad in the Corps. |
|
|
|
Post by Lomelis on Nov 17, 2024 0:02:51 GMT
It was predictable and weak. It was a riding the fence approach providing enough weaponry and intelligence to keep them from being completely overrun but not providing enough to effectively push Russia out early in the war. There hasn't been enough pressure on either side to come to the table to negotiate and there has been an unwillingness to negotiate directly with Russia about Ukrainian entry into NATO. I'm not sure if people are really paying attention to what's going on over there right now but Ukrainian is losing along the eastern lines. Russia is steadily taking eastern Ukraine a mile at a time and Ukraine has a massive manpower shortage. It can't get enough people to fight. www.reuters.com/world/europe/russia-took-196-square-km-ukraine-last-week-agentstvo-media-says-2024-10-29/deepstatemap.live/en#8/49.2552575/35.5847168The map can be used to watch how Russia has been picking Ukraine apart. Looks like you couldn't read a map, either, Shitbag. No wonder you failed so bad in the Corps. Lol you obviously haven't taken a good look at it. Try again. |
|
|
|
Post by rabbitreborn on Nov 17, 2024 0:10:24 GMT
the biden/harris administration should of been trying to get both sides together instead of escalating the war by giving Ukraine weapons to use against Russia. For some reason democrats get a boner over death. LOLZ! Russia attacked Kyiv directly. Because they wanted the whole enchilada, you dumb fuck. You are Exhibit 'A' of the Cuckification of the American Right. Is Ukraine attacking Russian territory because they want to take Russian land for Ukraine? |
|
thor
Legend
Posts: 20,391
Member is Online
|
Post by thor on Nov 17, 2024 0:14:03 GMT
LOLZ! Russia attacked Kyiv directly. Because they wanted the whole enchilada, you dumb fuck. You are Exhibit 'A' of the Cuckification of the American Right. Is Ukraine attacking Russian territory because they want to take Russian land for Ukraine? Your asking the wrong guy, dummy. I'm not privy to their decisions. But it's nice watching you Simp for Vlad.  |
|
thor
Legend
Posts: 20,391
Member is Online
|
Post by thor on Nov 17, 2024 0:15:01 GMT
Looks like you couldn't read a map, either, Shitbag. No wonder you failed so bad in the Corps. Lol you obviously haven't taken a good look at it. Try again. What is the square of 14, Shitbag? |
|
|
|
Post by rabbitreborn on Nov 17, 2024 0:28:36 GMT
Is Ukraine attacking Russian territory because they want to take Russian land for Ukraine? Your asking the wrong guy, dummy. I'm not privy to their decisions. But it's nice watching you Simp for Vlad. thor, it’s your argument that if one warring nation attacks a certain part of their opponent’s territory, that means they must want to take full control and ownership of that land. That’s your argument, buddy. If you can’t think of any other reason why Russia would attack Kyiv, then you must also assume that Ukraine is only attacking mainland Russia because they wish to seize it for themselves. I’m merely showing you a different application of your thought process. |
|
