freonbale
Legend
Stop telling me I'm awesome. I already know.
Posts: 19,780
|
Post by freonbale on Apr 30, 2024 1:46:30 GMT
Aww, you're trying to participate in the adult conversation. So cute. Freon Hahaha I'm not participating in anything. Just watching your google translate fail all over the place again. Seriously Igor, you really really should get that taken care of. You remind me of a puppy, always trying to get attention and love. Freon
|
|
|
Post by Mercy for All on Apr 30, 2024 1:47:00 GMT
I would encourage you to offer an example of when I “overstepped my bounds” on scientific knowledge. Please be specific. To what end, Mercy? Even your comments regarding purple and yellow light in this very thread, demonstrate the most basic understanding of physics. And that's barely high school level. As an experiment, I just asked my 15 year old the same question. I asked, 'where could yellow light be construed as purple, or vice versa', and his response was, 'on another planet, with a different color sun?'. Yeah, nailed it. Why didn't you? You think a high school training in science puts you anywhere even close to what a fully trained scientists knows, Mr. Dunning–Kruger? Freon Then it would be “purple,” which is not defined be wavelength but by the brain’s perception of the wavelength. Give it up. It’s all games with you. Especially because I wasn’t talking in a scientific context but an artistic context. But you, exerting your authority by insisting on your context, only see one perspective. Games.
|
|
|
Post by Mercy for All on Apr 30, 2024 1:47:24 GMT
Adults don’t accuse others of their own behaviour. Unless they’re playing games. Ahh, so now you are authoritative on what defines an adult. Do you ever stop being you? Freon More games.
|
|
freonbale
Legend
Stop telling me I'm awesome. I already know.
Posts: 19,780
|
Post by freonbale on Apr 30, 2024 1:48:41 GMT
Ahh, so now you are authoritative on what defines an adult. Do you ever stop being you? Freon More games. You just don't like having your modus operandi laid out for all to see, ESPECIALLY for you to see. This is you, Mercy. Mercy. Meet Mercy. Now play nice with each other, you two. Freon
|
|
|
Post by Mercy for All on Apr 30, 2024 1:49:25 GMT
You just don't like having your modus operandi laid out for all to see, ESPECIALLY for you to see. This is you, Mercy. Mercy. Meet Mercy. Now play nice with each other, you two. Freon You’re talking to yourself. You do understand that DESCRIBING THE BEHAVIOUR of something is not DEFINING something. “Cat’s use litter boxes when they’re house trained.” “THAT’S the definition of a CAT?!” Games. Or do you perceive that as me being authoritative about the definition of “definition”? I suspect that’s the next game. Problem is…you haven’t asked the right question.
|
|
freonbale
Legend
Stop telling me I'm awesome. I already know.
Posts: 19,780
|
Post by freonbale on Apr 30, 2024 1:52:50 GMT
To what end, Mercy? Even your comments regarding purple and yellow light in this very thread, demonstrate the most basic understanding of physics. And that's barely high school level. As an experiment, I just asked my 15 year old the same question. I asked, 'where could yellow light be construed as purple, or vice versa', and his response was, 'on another planet, with a different color sun?'. Yeah, nailed it. Why didn't you? You think a high school training in science puts you anywhere even close to what a fully trained scientists knows, Mr. Dunning–Kruger? Freon Then it would be “purple,” which is not defined be wavelength but by the brain’s perception of the wavelength. Give it up. It’s all games with you. Especially because I wasn’t talking in a scientific context but an artistic context. But you, exerting your authority by insisting on your context, only see one perspective. Games. lol. There you go again. Trying to sound 'sciency', and just letting those of us who ACTUALLY know science, see you as trying to play with the big boys. You think art is not science and vice versa? How do you know so incredibly little, Mercy? Is this the product of Canadian education? Because it is terrible. Shameful, even. I had no idea your population is let loose without basic knowledge. It's no wonder your country doesn't lead the world in science, as ours does. But I DO give you credit for the progenitor of the hovercraft. The Avro Car. Freon
|
|
|
Post by Mercy for All on Apr 30, 2024 1:53:38 GMT
Then it would be “purple,” which is not defined be wavelength but by the brain’s perception of the wavelength. Give it up. It’s all games with you. Especially because I wasn’t talking in a scientific context but an artistic context. But you, exerting your authority by insisting on your context, only see one perspective. Games. lol. There you go again. Trying to sound 'sciency', and just letting those of us who ACTUALLY know science, see you as trying to play with the big boys. You think art is not science and vice versa? How do you know so incredibly little, Mercy? Is this the product of Canadian education? Because it is terrible. Shameful, even. I had no idea your population is let loose without basic knowledge. It's no wonder your country doesn't lead the world in science, as our does. But I DO give you credit for the progenitor of the hovercraft. The Avro Car. Freon Are you doubling down on wavelength as the definer of colour? Tell me you’re doubling down on that.
|
|
freonbale
Legend
Stop telling me I'm awesome. I already know.
Posts: 19,780
|
Post by freonbale on Apr 30, 2024 1:53:59 GMT
You just don't like having your modus operandi laid out for all to see, ESPECIALLY for you to see. This is you, Mercy. Mercy. Meet Mercy. Now play nice with each other, you two. Freon You’re talking to yourself. You do understand that DESCRIBING THE BEHAVIOUR of something is not DEFINING something. “Cat’s use litter boxes when they’re house trained.” “THAT’S the definition of a CAT?!” Games. Or do you perceive that as me being authoritative about the definition of “definition”? I suspect that’s the next game. Problem is…you haven’t asked the right question. Ahh, I see you are frustrated now. It's cool. We can continue, if you wish, when you calm down a bit. Freon
|
|
freonbale
Legend
Stop telling me I'm awesome. I already know.
Posts: 19,780
|
Post by freonbale on Apr 30, 2024 1:55:22 GMT
lol. There you go again. Trying to sound 'sciency', and just letting those of us who ACTUALLY know science, see you as trying to play with the big boys. You think art is not science and vice versa? How do you know so incredibly little, Mercy? Is this the product of Canadian education? Because it is terrible. Shameful, even. I had no idea your population is let loose without basic knowledge. It's no wonder your country doesn't lead the world in science, as our does. But I DO give you credit for the progenitor of the hovercraft. The Avro Car. Freon Are you doubling down on wavelength as the definer of colour? Tell me you’re doubling down on that. It's interesting how your frustration translates directly into irrationality. As I said before, best if you calm down a bit. Don't worry, I'll still be here when you do. Freon
|
|
|
Post by Mercy for All on Apr 30, 2024 1:57:05 GMT
You’re talking to yourself. You do understand that DESCRIBING THE BEHAVIOUR of something is not DEFINING something. “Cat’s use litter boxes when they’re house trained.” “THAT’S the definition of a CAT?!” Games. Or do you perceive that as me being authoritative about the definition of “definition”? I suspect that’s the next game. Problem is…you haven’t asked the right question. Ahh, I see you are frustrated now. It's cool. We can continue, if you wish, when you calm down a bit. Freon Nah, I’m just on my phone so caps are easier than italics. But you do see the difference, don’t you, between a description of behaviour and ontology?
|
|
|
Post by Mercy for All on Apr 30, 2024 1:58:13 GMT
Are you doubling down on wavelength as the definer of colour? Tell me you’re doubling down on that. It's interesting how your frustration translates directly into irrationality. As I said before, best if you calm down a bit. Don't worry, I'll still be here when you do. Freon Are you? Doubling down on that? Is that your scientific conclusion? Is there colour without perception? Answer that. I dare you. You big ol’ scientist with a scientific 15-year-old son, you…
|
|
|
Post by Mercy for All on Apr 30, 2024 2:01:31 GMT
It's interesting how your frustration translates directly into irrationality. As I said before, best if you calm down a bit. Don't worry, I'll still be here when you do. Freon Are you? Doubling down on that? Is that your scientific conclusion? Is there colour without perception? Answer that. I dare you. You big ol’ scientist with a scientific 15-year-old son, you… Oh…on the run, I guess. I understand. You could have appealed to a qualia argument, I suppose. That would have been your best bet. Doubling down on wavelength determining color…that’s not your best bet.
|
|
|
Post by greebnurt on Apr 30, 2024 2:13:32 GMT
You just don't like having your modus operandi laid out for all to see, ESPECIALLY for you to see. This is you, Mercy. Mercy. Meet Mercy. Now play nice with each other, you two. Freon No, you play word games. You're just now being called out on it by everybody.
|
|
|
Post by greebnurt on Apr 30, 2024 2:14:47 GMT
You’re talking to yourself. You do understand that DESCRIBING THE BEHAVIOUR of something is not DEFINING something. “Cat’s use litter boxes when they’re house trained.” “THAT’S the definition of a CAT?!” Games. Or do you perceive that as me being authoritative about the definition of “definition”? I suspect that’s the next game. Problem is…you haven’t asked the right question. Ahh, I see you are frustrated now. It's cool. We can continue, if you wish, when you calm down a bit. Freon Fucking douche. Try acting like a normal person.
|
|
freonbale
Legend
Stop telling me I'm awesome. I already know.
Posts: 19,780
|
Post by freonbale on Apr 30, 2024 4:34:18 GMT
Ahh, I see you are frustrated now. It's cool. We can continue, if you wish, when you calm down a bit. Freon Fucking douche. Try acting like a normal person. Serious yawn. Do you have any insults that a grown-up might find offensive? I cannot take that one seriously. Freon
|
|
freonbale
Legend
Stop telling me I'm awesome. I already know.
Posts: 19,780
|
Post by freonbale on Apr 30, 2024 4:35:14 GMT
You just don't like having your modus operandi laid out for all to see, ESPECIALLY for you to see. This is you, Mercy. Mercy. Meet Mercy. Now play nice with each other, you two. Freon No, you play word games. You're just now being called out on it by everybody. Only to someone not very bright, would my words be construed as a game. Is that what you are acknowledging? That you're not too bright? Do you really think you should be telling us all that so clearly? Freon
|
|
freonbale
Legend
Stop telling me I'm awesome. I already know.
Posts: 19,780
|
Post by freonbale on Apr 30, 2024 4:36:36 GMT
Are you? Doubling down on that? Is that your scientific conclusion? Is there colour without perception? Answer that. I dare you. You big ol’ scientist with a scientific 15-year-old son, you… Oh…on the run, I guess. I understand. You could have appealed to a qualia argument, I suppose. That would have been your best bet. Doubling down on wavelength determining color…that’s not your best bet. I'm still waiting for you two to calm down. Freon
|
|
Odysseus
Legend
Trump=Chump
Posts: 39,224
|
Post by Odysseus on Apr 30, 2024 4:39:58 GMT
Fucking douche. Try acting like a normal person. Serious yawn. Do you have any insults that a grown-up might find offensive? I cannot take that one seriously. Freon
I also find Greebnurt to be very immature.
Glad I'm not the only one.
|
|
freonbale
Legend
Stop telling me I'm awesome. I already know.
Posts: 19,780
|
Post by freonbale on Apr 30, 2024 13:37:02 GMT
Serious yawn. Do you have any insults that a grown-up might find offensive? I cannot take that one seriously. Freon
I also find Greebnurt to be very immature.
Glad I'm not the only one.
Agree. When he first came here, I couldn't tell his political bent, purely because the maturity level was similar to the emotional far righties. Freon
|
|
|
Post by Mercy for All on Apr 30, 2024 13:42:32 GMT
Oh…on the run, I guess. I understand. You could have appealed to a qualia argument, I suppose. That would have been your best bet. Doubling down on wavelength determining color…that’s not your best bet. I'm still waiting for you two to calm down. Freon Let's keep score here: 1) You claim to have only played the "asking the right question" game with me. Proven wrong. It wasn't too hard to find examples of you doing that to a few others. 2) You keep accusing me of responding according to "dogma." When pressed, the "dogma" equates to something like "believing that there is only one perspective on anything." Which is obviously and demonstrably not true. 3) You keep accusing me of weighing in on science while being completely unqualified. When pressed, you could offer no examples. 4) Now you're stuck with a deficient "scientific" justification for claiming that something could be its own opposite—and then refuse to acknowledge that you are running away from the question. What's your next play here?
|
|