Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 4, 2020 19:00:34 GMT
BS. I was clear you just read it too fast, or wanted to find a contradiction. I suspect it was the latter. You don't like me and would love to make me look idiotic. You do that on your own. Always praised you until you attacked me for no reason. Recall your “I m talking about you “ comment when you weren’t even part of that discussion? I recall being very nice to you. Remember our private talk about David Jones. Sure you do. You took our relationship for lack of a better phrase... south. Not me. I also praised your debate prowess I don't care how much you like me or think highly of my debate prowess. I don't need fan mail from rude people who can't read or follow a conversation. Nice people who who can't read or follow a conversation, I'm fine with. Send all the fan mail you want. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 4, 2020 20:10:59 GMT
I don't care how much you like me or think highly of my debate prowess. I don't need fan mail from rude people who can't read or follow a conversation. Nice people who who can't read or follow a conversation, I'm fine with. Send all the fan mail you want. Now your list of those that hate me. I wouldn't put words in their mouths but I believe every single person you have name dropped in this thread is someone you routinely cross swords with for less than interesting reasons. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 4, 2020 20:12:58 GMT
All this. 5 pages all because you TL can’t conduct yourself like an adult. How is it my fault that you mis-read my post? How is my fault you became angry and insulting when I pointed out the error? |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 4, 2020 20:16:05 GMT
I wouldn't put words in their mouths but I believe every single person you have name dropped in this thread is someone you routinely cross swords with for less than interesting reasons. List the names I dropped. You started by bringing Maestro in. I mentioned no one. If I forgot and did...you should have no problem listing them Anyone who cares to look can read the thread. I'm not at your beck and call. |
|
|
|
Post by Fiddler on Aug 4, 2020 20:19:23 GMT
List those that hate me and those I listed as buddies Hate's not the right word. You're just boring. You contribute nothing. EVERY thread you take part in is reduced to you going on and on about what you think someone meant and infantile predictions of what you think their reason for saying it was.. Grow up. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 4, 2020 20:21:40 GMT
Anyone who cares to look can read the thread. I'm not at your beck and call. That’s one way to save face. Lie and don’t back yourself. If I did no doubt it was to say they backed the thread from the other day "backed the thread from the other day." What does that mean? I can almost feel the goalposts sliding. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 4, 2020 20:24:22 GMT
List those that hate me and those I listed as buddies Hate's not the right word. You're just boring. You contribute nothing. EVERY thread you take part in is reduced to you going on and on about what you think someone meant and infantile predictions of what you think their reason for saying it was.. Its a pattern. And the best part is this petty and infantile conversation ends up revealing he is actually confused about just what is being said. |
|
|
|
Post by Fiddler on Aug 4, 2020 20:24:23 GMT
Hate's not the right word. You're just boring. You contribute nothing. EVERY thread you take part in is reduced to you going on and on about what you think someone meant and infantile predictions of what you think their reason for saying it was.. Grow up. Not what you said the other day. More like “at least you back up what you say”
Providing facts is 'backing up what you say' ... . Page after page of your "didn't say.. did say.. didn't say.. did say.." is just tiring. It's bullshit.
Do better.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 4, 2020 20:25:12 GMT
"backed the thread from the other day." What does that mean? I can almost feel the goalposts sliding. Nice try. At best I may have said to Greg or someone els a reference to a similar discussion on absentee vs mail in and that others agreed The burden of proof is on you. You made the accusation not me, unfounded as usual I don't care about any of this bs. I just know that your buddy list thinks you're a tiresome bore. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 4, 2020 20:35:35 GMT
"Yo dawg, I need some cred, back my thread from the other day."
You see why Abe sticks to infantile topics of discussion. Even in silly subjects dealing with petty he said, she said BS, he is still incapable of hiding his low-IQ. Imagine what would happen if we were discussing something thoughtful or complex.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 4, 2020 20:49:09 GMT
"Yo dawg, I need some cred, back my thread from the other day." You see why Abe sticks to infantile topics of discussion. Even in silly subjects dealing with petty he said, she said BS, he is still incapable of hiding his low-IQ. Imagine what would happen if we were discussing something thoughtful or complex. You spitting while typing angry little boy. The infantile one would be the Karen using the word, dawg You ruined the thread not me. You also have been flailing all day over a post that was contradictory... and here you still are. Mirror? You've yet to show a contradiction that wasn't the product of your own deceitful editing. Yet you continue to wave your hands insisting a contradiction is present but have no mind to get into the details of explaining it, and when I show very clearly that you have mis-read me, you are silent. So I am quite comfortable sitting back and having some fun at your expense. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 4, 2020 20:56:22 GMT
You've yet to show a contradiction that wasn't the product of your own deceitful editing. Yet you continue to wave your hands insisting a contradiction is present but have no mind to get into the details of explaining it, and when I show very clearly that you have mis-read me, you are silent. So I am quite comfortable sitting back and having some fun at your expense. Lying still? Bolding is not editing and saying so is deceptive. Not at my expense. Remember you said everyone hates me so the question in their minds will be why did you do this all day and still lie to the bitter end The deceitful editing was in bolding two separate sentences with the intent that they be read as a single contradictory thought. When in reality, without your bolding, it is clear that there are two separate thoughts involved (and no contradiction). You didn't change the wording, but you did change the framing and through this change tried to pass off a bullshit mis-read as something that is obvious. And you were called out on it. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 4, 2020 21:01:41 GMT
The deceitful editing was to bold two separate sentences with the intent that they be read as a single contradictory thought. When in reality, without your bolding, it is clear that there are two separate thoughts involved (and no contradiction). You didn't change the wording, but you did change the framing and through it tried to pass off a bullshit mis-read as something that is obvious. And you were called out on it. Wrong again. I highlighted the only two sentences that were relevant yet contradictory. No framing changed at all sine everyone had the ability to read your entire post and decide for themselves You highlighted two sentences and ignored everything in between as if those two sentences followed each other. That's dishonest. It completely alters my meaning and creates a contradiction. That kind of witless trolling is a waste of time and energy. No one wants to participate in this nonsense. You should be ashamed of yourself. Maybe think about picking up some Ginkgo before logging in, or microdosing psilocybin. Something to get the juices flowing in that noggin of yours. I hear nootropics are hot now. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 4, 2020 21:09:53 GMT
You highlighted two sentences and ignored everything in between as if those two sentences followed each other. That's dishonest. It completely alters my meaning and creates a contradiction. That kind of witless trolling is a waste of time and energy. No one wants to participate in this nonsense. You should be ashamed of yourself. Maybe think about picking up some Ginkgo before logging in, or microdosing psilocybin. Something to get the juices flowing in that noggin of yours. I hear nootropics are hot now. Frustrated? Nothing worth a pile of shit in between. A cheap shot at Fox. 2nd sentence of 1st paragraph is meaningless You can say its a cheap shot, you can say its not something you agree with, you can say its all meaningless, but that doesn't give you the right to deceptively edit something and give it a new meaning that suits your purposes. You read me in bad-faith and edited the format to reinforce your bad-faith read. And nothing you can say will alter that fact and I will continue to remind you of it until you admit you made an error. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 4, 2020 21:19:06 GMT
You can say its a cheap shot, you can say its not something you agree with, you can say its all meaningless, but that doesn't give you the right to deceptively edit something and give it a new meaning that suits your purposes. You read me in bad-faith and edited the format to reinforce your bad-faith read. And nothing you can say will alter that fact and I will continue to remind you of it until you admit you made an error. Still lying. Highlighting as you already agreed is not editing. If you can’t stop lying at least stop repeating Now I edited the format 🤣😂🤣. That’s from the king of parsing who does it in bad faith to make a person’s point look disjointed You edited the format to create a new meaning. A contradictory meaning. That's being dishonest. You can say it was justified because I do the same thing (I don't), but then that makes you no better than me. You're still guilty of trying to create the appearance of a contradiction. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 4, 2020 21:28:31 GMT
You edited the format to create a new meaning. A contradictory meaning. That's being dishonest. You can say it was justified because I do the same thing (I don't), but then that makes you no better than me. You're still guilty of trying to create the appearance of a contradiction. You can repeat it all night but no meaning was changed. Your entire post was intact as posted Are you saying people are too stupid to read it and decide for themselves.?Shame you think so little of everyone but your egotism self. I know people can read and decide for themselves. My concern is with you and your completely deceptive mis-read. You're quite right that the entire post was intact, but you absolutely intended to change the meaning with the reformatting. You wanted to tie two sentences together that had no business being together to create the appearance of a contradiction. You might not realize you did this, and I honestly don't think you do. You're outing yourself as being low-IQ. I already knew you were an asshole. But I didn't know you were a stupid asshole. Now I do. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 4, 2020 21:40:22 GMT
I know people can read and decide for themselves. My concern is with you and your completely deceptive mis-read. You're quite right that the entire post was intact, but you absolutely intended to change the meaning with the reformatting. You wanted to tie two sentences together that had no business being together to create the appearance of a contradiction. You might not realize you did this, and I honestly don't think you do. You're outing yourself as being low-IQ. I already knew you were an asshole. But I didn't know you were a stupid asshole. Now I do. Now it’s not editing but reformatting 🤣. It’s called highlighting what I felt was contradictory. Now had I removed any words that would be worth your lame arguing all day Editing or reformatting or how about both? I'm fine either way. Regardless of the semantics, without the emphasis you imposed on my words, the sentences do not contradict. They shouldn't be read the way you want to read them. Even with the emphasis you impose on my words, it is clear what I am talking about. The contradiction has to be read in. And it is a rather artless rendering. You're clearly a moron. This is Wadsworth level reading failure. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 4, 2020 21:46:41 GMT
Editing or reformatting or how about both? I'm fine either way. Regardless of the semantics, without the emphasis you imposed on my words, the sentences do not contradict. They shouldn't be read the way you want to read them. Even with the emphasis you impose on my words, it is clear what I am talking about. The contradiction has to be read in. And it is a rather artless rendering. You're clearly a moron. This is Wadsworth level reading failure. More of the same obtuseness and insults. 🥱 This is the space where you were to explain why your deceptive reformatting was actually accurate and that the contradiction is really there. But alas. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 4, 2020 22:00:16 GMT
This is the space where you were to explain why your deceptive reformatting was actually accurate and that the contradiction is really there. But alas. The space is in your head along with the explanation given a dozen times. I highlighted what I perceived as contradictory sentences leaving your post intact for all to see who may differ. So far all we have is you lying and whining all day. There was no reformatting. No editing. Now frankly here’s where I say fuck off and goodbye. You are boring, tedious and tiresome with your obtuseness and redundancy Now you’re the one behaving like Waddy. Harry also used to say give Waddy enough time and he will prove himself wrong. So welcome Wads. Your read strikes me as batty. It doesn't follow from a clean, honest, fair read of the post. It strikes me as a crude attempt at trolling. Or a Wadsworth style massive failure in reading comprehension. Like I said. I already knew you were an asshole. No surprises there. But the stupidity part. This reading comprehension thing. This is a revelation. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 4, 2020 22:13:13 GMT
Your read strikes me as batty. It doesn't follow from a clean, honest, fair read of the post. It strikes me as a crude attempt at trolling. Or a Wadsworth style massive failure in reading comprehension. Like I said. I already knew you were an asshole. No surprises there. But the stupidity part. This reading comprehension thing. This is a revelation. I feel likewise about you. A whining asshole to boot Feel better now? Obtuse too. In conclusion...you lose. Bye Okay, well that settles it. You're not trolling me. You truly are unable to read that passage properly. You truly feel your reformatting is a straight forward read of my words. You truly see a contradiction. No joking. No bs. I find that slightly remarkable. I similarly found Wadsworth remarkable. |
|
