RWB
Legend
Posts: 11,809
|
Post by RWB on Sept 1, 2021 17:59:50 GMT
|
|
petep
Legend
Posts: 23,447
|
Post by petep on Sept 1, 2021 18:38:56 GMT
Exactly as predicted last summer by many here and many experts.
|
|
Fiddler
Legend
Wasted again ..
Posts: 13,845
|
Post by Fiddler on Sept 1, 2021 19:16:51 GMT
Exactly as predicted last summer by many here and many experts.
You could at least try to hide your delight ..
Still.. I don't recall anyone even suggesting that there wouldn't be more variants.. In fact, such was the warning given the huge numbers of unvaccinated.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 1, 2021 19:27:12 GMT
Exactly as predicted last summer by many here and many experts.
You could at least try to hide your delight ..
Still.. I don't recall anyone even suggesting that there wouldn't be more variants.. In fact, such was the warning given the huge numbers of unvaccinated.
The unvaccinated have no immune response which is needed to create resistant variants. Vaccinated folks (and likely those of us who had the virus) are the variant factories.
|
|
Fiddler
Legend
Wasted again ..
Posts: 13,845
|
Post by Fiddler on Sept 1, 2021 19:45:21 GMT
You could at least try to hide your delight ..
Still.. I don't recall anyone even suggesting that there wouldn't be more variants.. In fact, such was the warning given the huge numbers of unvaccinated.
The unvaccinated have no immune response which is needed to create resistant variants. Vaccinated folks (and likely those of us who had the virus) are the variant factories.
Are you even capable of learning.. ?..
"Unvaccinated people are potential variant factories," Dr. William Schaffner, a professor in the Division of Infectious Diseases at Vanderbilt University Medical Center, told CNN.
"The more unvaccinated people there are, the more opportunities for the virus to multiply," he added.
Variants evolve in the body of a person who is infected with the coronavirus.
"When it does, it mutates, and it could throw off a variant mutation that is even more serious down the road," Schaffner said.
Viruses, including the coronavirus that causes COVID-19, endure mutations, and while some mutations may harm the virus, others could help it. For example, a mutation could help a virus be more transmissible.
When the virus spreads to another person, the mutation will replicate and also spread, and if it's successful and continues to spread, it becomes a variant.
Unvaccinated people provide the opportunity for the mutation to continue to replicate, CNN reported.
"As mutations come up in viruses, the ones that persist are the ones that make it easier for the virus to spread in the population," Andrew Pekosz, a microbiologist and immunologist at the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, told CNN."Every time the viruses changes, that gives the virus a different platform to add more mutations. Now we have viruses that spread more efficiently."
Essentially if a virus can't spread, it can't mutate.
I believe the only question left is .. can you resist doubling down on stupid .. ?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 1, 2021 20:00:10 GMT
The unvaccinated have no immune response which is needed to create resistant variants. Vaccinated folks (and likely those of us who had the virus) are the variant factories.
Are you even capable of learning.. ?..
"Unvaccinated people are potential variant factories," Dr. William Schaffner, a professor in the Division of Infectious Diseases at Vanderbilt University Medical Center, told CNN.
"The more unvaccinated people there are, the more opportunities for the virus to multiply," he added.
Variants evolve in the body of a person who is infected with the coronavirus.
"When it does, it mutates, and it could throw off a variant mutation that is even more serious down the road," Schaffner said.
Viruses, including the coronavirus that causes COVID-19, endure mutations, and while some mutations may harm the virus, others could help it. For example, a mutation could help a virus be more transmissible.
When the virus spreads to another person, the mutation will replicate and also spread, and if it's successful and continues to spread, it becomes a variant.
Unvaccinated people provide the opportunity for the mutation to continue to replicate, CNN reported.
"As mutations come up in viruses, the ones that persist are the ones that make it easier for the virus to spread in the population," Andrew Pekosz, a microbiologist and immunologist at the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, told CNN."Every time the viruses changes, that gives the virus a different platform to add more mutations. Now we have viruses that spread more efficiently."
Essentially if a virus can't spread, it can't mutate.
I believe the only question left is .. can you resist doubling down on stupid .. ?
Why would I double down on you, stupid?
There is zero proof to suggest that non-injected people are the ones now functioning as “viral factories” as the government claims. To the contrary, the injected have been marked with toxic chemicals that are mutating into new forms of illness that are sending people to the hospital with “covid.”
An article recently published in Quanta Magazine warns that just like how taking antibiotics breeds antibiotic-resistant “superbugs,” taking these so-called vaccines contributes to the breeding of new variants that send some people to the hospital – or worse.
The piece discusses the history of the anti-Marek’s disease vaccine for chickens, which was first introduced back in 1970. It has had to be reinvented some three different times now because the virus continues to mutate to evade the vaccine.
The reason for this, of course, is that vaccines produce fake immunity, at best – fake meaning the type of immunity that wanes over time. Real immunity, which is produced by the immune system, lasts a lifetime.
A 2015 study published in the journal PLoS Biology also looked at the anti-Marek’s disease vaccine for chickens, revealing that unvaccinated chickens are the least likely to shed more virulent strains of the virus into the wild. Vaccinated chickens, on the other hand, are basically walking disease carriers.
“The findings suggest that the Marek’s vaccine encourages more dangerous viruses to proliferate,” the Quanta Magazine article explains. “This increased virulence might then give the viruses the means to overcome birds’ vaccine-primed immune responses and sicken vaccinated flocks.”
|
|
|
Post by atreyu on Sept 1, 2021 22:13:44 GMT
Are you even capable of learning.. ?..
"Unvaccinated people are potential variant factories," Dr. William Schaffner, a professor in the Division of Infectious Diseases at Vanderbilt University Medical Center, told CNN.
"The more unvaccinated people there are, the more opportunities for the virus to multiply," he added.
Variants evolve in the body of a person who is infected with the coronavirus.
"When it does, it mutates, and it could throw off a variant mutation that is even more serious down the road," Schaffner said.
Viruses, including the coronavirus that causes COVID-19, endure mutations, and while some mutations may harm the virus, others could help it. For example, a mutation could help a virus be more transmissible.
When the virus spreads to another person, the mutation will replicate and also spread, and if it's successful and continues to spread, it becomes a variant.
Unvaccinated people provide the opportunity for the mutation to continue to replicate, CNN reported.
"As mutations come up in viruses, the ones that persist are the ones that make it easier for the virus to spread in the population," Andrew Pekosz, a microbiologist and immunologist at the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, told CNN."Every time the viruses changes, that gives the virus a different platform to add more mutations. Now we have viruses that spread more efficiently."
Essentially if a virus can't spread, it can't mutate.
I believe the only question left is .. can you resist doubling down on stupid .. ?
Why would I double down on you, stupid?
There is zero proof to suggest that non-injected people are the ones now functioning as “viral factories” as the government claims. To the contrary, the injected have been marked with toxic chemicals that are mutating into new forms of illness that are sending people to the hospital with “covid.”
An article recently published in Quanta Magazine warns that just like how taking antibiotics breeds antibiotic-resistant “superbugs,” taking these so-called vaccines contributes to the breeding of new variants that send some people to the hospital – or worse.
The piece discusses the history of the anti-Marek’s disease vaccine for chickens, which was first introduced back in 1970. It has had to be reinvented some three different times now because the virus continues to mutate to evade the vaccine.
The reason for this, of course, is that vaccines produce fake immunity, at best – fake meaning the type of immunity that wanes over time. Real immunity, which is produced by the immune system, lasts a lifetime.
A 2015 study published in the journal PLoS Biology also looked at the anti-Marek’s disease vaccine for chickens, revealing that unvaccinated chickens are the least likely to shed more virulent strains of the virus into the wild. Vaccinated chickens, on the other hand, are basically walking disease carriers.
“The findings suggest that the Marek’s vaccine encourages more dangerous viruses to proliferate,” the Quanta Magazine article explains. “This increased virulence might then give the viruses the means to overcome birds’ vaccine-primed immune responses and sicken vaccinated flocks.”
Yes, you totally convinced me when your source is a crackpot conspiracy website.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 2, 2021 19:33:41 GMT
Why would I double down on you, stupid?
There is zero proof to suggest that non-injected people are the ones now functioning as “viral factories” as the government claims. To the contrary, the injected have been marked with toxic chemicals that are mutating into new forms of illness that are sending people to the hospital with “covid.”
An article recently published in Quanta Magazine warns that just like how taking antibiotics breeds antibiotic-resistant “superbugs,” taking these so-called vaccines contributes to the breeding of new variants that send some people to the hospital – or worse.
The piece discusses the history of the anti-Marek’s disease vaccine for chickens, which was first introduced back in 1970. It has had to be reinvented some three different times now because the virus continues to mutate to evade the vaccine.
The reason for this, of course, is that vaccines produce fake immunity, at best – fake meaning the type of immunity that wanes over time. Real immunity, which is produced by the immune system, lasts a lifetime.
A 2015 study published in the journal PLoS Biology also looked at the anti-Marek’s disease vaccine for chickens, revealing that unvaccinated chickens are the least likely to shed more virulent strains of the virus into the wild. Vaccinated chickens, on the other hand, are basically walking disease carriers.
“The findings suggest that the Marek’s vaccine encourages more dangerous viruses to proliferate,” the Quanta Magazine article explains. “This increased virulence might then give the viruses the means to overcome birds’ vaccine-primed immune responses and sicken vaccinated flocks.”
Yes, you totally convinced me when your source is a crackpot conspiracy website.
Attacking the source is a common logical fallacy used by those who are too stupid to challenge the message.
Why are you too stupid to address the details rather than lamely trying to impeach the source?
|
|
Fiddler
Legend
Wasted again ..
Posts: 13,845
|
Post by Fiddler on Sept 2, 2021 20:26:59 GMT
Are you even capable of learning.. ?..
"Unvaccinated people are potential variant factories," Dr. William Schaffner, a professor in the Division of Infectious Diseases at Vanderbilt University Medical Center, told CNN.
"The more unvaccinated people there are, the more opportunities for the virus to multiply," he added.
Variants evolve in the body of a person who is infected with the coronavirus.
"When it does, it mutates, and it could throw off a variant mutation that is even more serious down the road," Schaffner said.
Viruses, including the coronavirus that causes COVID-19, endure mutations, and while some mutations may harm the virus, others could help it. For example, a mutation could help a virus be more transmissible.
When the virus spreads to another person, the mutation will replicate and also spread, and if it's successful and continues to spread, it becomes a variant.
Unvaccinated people provide the opportunity for the mutation to continue to replicate, CNN reported.
"As mutations come up in viruses, the ones that persist are the ones that make it easier for the virus to spread in the population," Andrew Pekosz, a microbiologist and immunologist at the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, told CNN."Every time the viruses changes, that gives the virus a different platform to add more mutations. Now we have viruses that spread more efficiently."
Essentially if a virus can't spread, it can't mutate.
I believe the only question left is .. can you resist doubling down on stupid .. ?
Why would I double down on you, stupid?
There is zero proof to suggest that non-injected people are the ones now functioning as “viral factories” as the government claims. To the contrary, the injected have been marked with toxic chemicals that are mutating into new forms of illness that are sending people to the hospital with “covid.”
An article recently published in Quanta Magazine warns that just like how taking antibiotics breeds antibiotic-resistant “superbugs,” taking these so-called vaccines contributes to the breeding of new variants that send some people to the hospital – or worse.
The piece discusses the history of the anti-Marek’s disease vaccine for chickens, which was first introduced back in 1970. It has had to be reinvented some three different times now because the virus continues to mutate to evade the vaccine.
The reason for this, of course, is that vaccines produce fake immunity, at best – fake meaning the type of immunity that wanes over time. Real immunity, which is produced by the immune system, lasts a lifetime.
A 2015 study published in the journal PLoS Biology also looked at the anti-Marek’s disease vaccine for chickens, revealing that unvaccinated chickens are the least likely to shed more virulent strains of the virus into the wild. Vaccinated chickens, on the other hand, are basically walking disease carriers.
“The findings suggest that the Marek’s vaccine encourages more dangerous viruses to proliferate,” the Quanta Magazine article explains. “This increased virulence might then give the viruses the means to overcome birds’ vaccine-primed immune responses and sicken vaccinated flocks.”
Oh my Gawd.. This is fucking HILARIOUS ...
I give you actual science and you insult everyone with moronic tripe from an anti-vaxx freelance conspiracy crackpot, real estate salesman and part time pseudoscience propagandist that only the most science illiterate douchenozzles .. this is where you come in.. would believe. .. And then you have the u.n.b.e.l.i.e.v.a.b.l.e. arrogance to try and foist that bullshit on ME.. your intellectual superior..
You did promise me something more idiotic than your Confederate Memorial hallucinations and damn if you didn't make good on that promise.. You are indeed the consummate fool..
|
|
Fiddler
Legend
Wasted again ..
Posts: 13,845
|
Post by Fiddler on Sept 2, 2021 20:28:58 GMT
Yes, you totally convinced me when your source is a crackpot conspiracy website.
Attacking the source is a common logical fallacy used by those who are too stupid to challenge the message.
Why are you too stupid to address the details rather than lamely trying to impeach the source?
What message ?.. That you're an idiot.. That is at least believable..
By the looks of it, Ethan A Huff is a very busy reporter. Or, rather, a very busy poster. Content under his byline appears across various conspiracy, climate denial and anti-vaxx blogs like the Epoch Times, Natural News, NewsTarget, Climate.News, Science Clowns, Propaganda.News and elsewhere.
In just the past week Huff published stories about how climate alarmists are working with the LGBT community to depopulate the planet, how vaccines are causing polio and YouTube and other online giants are covering up this vaccine-caused polio outbreak, how 600,000 Mexicans were protesting abortion and “LGBT indoctrination,” as well as stories on Greta Thunberg, white people not being allowed to speak anymore, Hillary Clinton threatening Ronan Farrow, a Chinese bitcoin farm catching fire, Blizzard appeasing China, Johnson and Johnson facing lawsuits, vaping, Trump claiming Big Pharma is behind the impeachment hoax, climate scientists lying, and real scientists declaring there’s no climate emergency.
Aside from his prolific posting, there doesn’t seem to be any indication that he actually exists. Unlike most reporters, including others at some of his outlets, we couldn’t find a Twitter account associated with his name. There’s also no LinkedIn accounts or Facebook profiles that fit the bill.
Link
|
|
RWB
Legend
Posts: 11,809
|
Post by RWB on Sept 2, 2021 20:29:07 GMT
Yes, you totally convinced me when your source is a crackpot conspiracy website.
Attacking the source is a common logical fallacy used by those who are too stupid to challenge the message.
Why are you too stupid to address the details rather than lamely trying to impeach the source?
You answered your own question She’s Stupid 🙄
|
|
Fiddler
Legend
Wasted again ..
Posts: 13,845
|
Post by Fiddler on Sept 2, 2021 20:32:36 GMT
Attacking the source is a common logical fallacy used by those who are too stupid to challenge the message.
Why are you too stupid to address the details rather than lamely trying to impeach the source?
You answered your own question She’s Stupid 🙄
Are you one of the right-wing wunderkinds that Queshank fawns over ..?
|
|
|
Post by atreyu on Sept 2, 2021 21:15:58 GMT
Yes, you totally convinced me when your source is a crackpot conspiracy website.
Attacking the source is a common logical fallacy used by those who are too stupid to challenge the message.
Why are you too stupid to address the details rather than lamely trying to impeach the source?
Ah yes, every article on the national enquirer needs debunking individually. How about The Onion?
How about we believe the scientists and doctors rather than some quack?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 2, 2021 21:45:59 GMT
Why would I double down on you, stupid?
There is zero proof to suggest that non-injected people are the ones now functioning as “viral factories” as the government claims. To the contrary, the injected have been marked with toxic chemicals that are mutating into new forms of illness that are sending people to the hospital with “covid.”
An article recently published in Quanta Magazine warns that just like how taking antibiotics breeds antibiotic-resistant “superbugs,” taking these so-called vaccines contributes to the breeding of new variants that send some people to the hospital – or worse.
The piece discusses the history of the anti-Marek’s disease vaccine for chickens, which was first introduced back in 1970. It has had to be reinvented some three different times now because the virus continues to mutate to evade the vaccine.
The reason for this, of course, is that vaccines produce fake immunity, at best – fake meaning the type of immunity that wanes over time. Real immunity, which is produced by the immune system, lasts a lifetime.
A 2015 study published in the journal PLoS Biology also looked at the anti-Marek’s disease vaccine for chickens, revealing that unvaccinated chickens are the least likely to shed more virulent strains of the virus into the wild. Vaccinated chickens, on the other hand, are basically walking disease carriers.
“The findings suggest that the Marek’s vaccine encourages more dangerous viruses to proliferate,” the Quanta Magazine article explains. “This increased virulence might then give the viruses the means to overcome birds’ vaccine-primed immune responses and sicken vaccinated flocks.”
Oh my Gawd.. This is fucking HILARIOUS ...
I give you actual science and you insult everyone with moronic tripe from an anti-vaxx freelance conspiracy crackpot, real estate salesman and part time pseudoscience propagandist that only the most science illiterate douchenozzles .. this is where you come in.. would believe. .. And then you have the u.n.b.e.l.i.e.v.a.b.l.e. arrogance to try and foist that bullshit on ME.. your intellectual superior..
You did promise me something more idiotic than your Confederate Memorial hallucinations and damn if you didn't make good on that promise.. You are indeed the consummate fool..
Listen, BUTT-PLUG, you've made it clear that you are too stupid to attack the content of what I posted and that you are too much of a lemming to question or doubt the veracity of the counter intuitive idea that those who are unvaccinated offer any resistance that would create a mutation.
You look just like the last moron who went after the messenger, who is doing nothing but referencing a legitimate scientific magazine to make his case.
Here's the actual article:
Immunization is also making once-rare or nonexistent genetic variants of pathogens more prevalent, presumably because vaccine-primed antibodies can’t as easily recognize and attack shape-shifters that look different from vaccine strains. And vaccines being developed against some of the world’s wilier pathogens — malaria, HIV, anthrax — are based on strategies that could, according to evolutionary models and lab experiments, encourage pathogens to become even more dangerous.
By the way, here's fair warning if you respond "I'm not black" to the moniker "BUTT-PLUG"; I'm told that most BUTT-PLUGS ARE black, so be careful.
Anything else, BUTT-PLUG?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 2, 2021 21:52:27 GMT
Attacking the source is a common logical fallacy used by those who are too stupid to challenge the message.
Why are you too stupid to address the details rather than lamely trying to impeach the source?
Ah yes, every article on the national enquirer needs debunking individually. How about The Onion?
How about we believe the scientists and doctors rather than some quack? Quanta Magazine is an editorially independent online publication of the Simons Foundation covering developments in physics, mathematics, biology and computer science.
Undark Magazine described Quanta Magazine as "highly regarded for its masterful coverage of complex topics in science and math." The science news aggregator RealClearScience ranked Quanta Magazine No. 1 on its list of "The Top 10 Websites for Science in 2018." In 2020, Quanta Magazine received a National Magazine Award for General Excellence from the American Society of Magazine Editors for its "willingness to tackle some of the toughest and most difficult topics in science and math in a language that is accessible to the lay reader without condescension or oversimplification."
The articles in the magazine are freely available to read online. Several publications like Scientific American, Wired, The Atlantic, and The Washington Post, as well as international science publications like Spektrum der Wissenschaft, have reprinted articles from Quanta Magazine.
Immunization is also making once-rare or nonexistent genetic variants of pathogens more prevalent, presumably because vaccine-primed antibodies can’t as easily recognize and attack shape-shifters that look different from vaccine strains. And vaccines being developed against some of the world’s wilier pathogens — malaria, HIV, anthrax — are based on strategies that could, according to evolutionary models and lab experiments, encourage pathogens to become even more dangerous.
THAT'S the actual source of what the article writer was talking about, and it sure as hell ain't the National Enquirer.
See how stupid you look when you attack the messenger rather than dissecting the message?
|
|
petep
Legend
Posts: 23,447
|
Post by petep on Sept 3, 2021 11:32:47 GMT
Yet another leaky vaccine with unintended consequences.
|
|
|
Post by atreyu on Sept 3, 2021 12:31:36 GMT
Ah yes, every article on the national enquirer needs debunking individually. How about The Onion?
How about we believe the scientists and doctors rather than some quack? Quanta Magazine is an editorially independent online publication of the Simons Foundation covering developments in physics, mathematics, biology and computer science.
Undark Magazine described Quanta Magazine as "highly regarded for its masterful coverage of complex topics in science and math." The science news aggregator RealClearScience ranked Quanta Magazine No. 1 on its list of "The Top 10 Websites for Science in 2018." In 2020, Quanta Magazine received a National Magazine Award for General Excellence from the American Society of Magazine Editors for its "willingness to tackle some of the toughest and most difficult topics in science and math in a language that is accessible to the lay reader without condescension or oversimplification."
The articles in the magazine are freely available to read online. Several publications like Scientific American, Wired, The Atlantic, and The Washington Post, as well as international science publications like Spektrum der Wissenschaft, have reprinted articles from Quanta Magazine.
Immunization is also making once-rare or nonexistent genetic variants of pathogens more prevalent, presumably because vaccine-primed antibodies can’t as easily recognize and attack shape-shifters that look different from vaccine strains. And vaccines being developed against some of the world’s wilier pathogens — malaria, HIV, anthrax — are based on strategies that could, according to evolutionary models and lab experiments, encourage pathogens to become even more dangerous.
THAT'S the actual source of what the article writer was talking about, and it sure as hell ain't the National Enquirer.
See how stupid you look when you attack the messenger rather than dissecting the message?
Evolutionary biologists aren’t surprised that this is happening. A vaccine is a novel selection pressure placed on a pathogen, and if the vaccine does not eradicate its target completely, then the remaining pathogens with the greatest fitness — those able to survive, somehow, in an immunized world — will become more common. “If you don’t have these pathogens evolving in response to vaccines,” said Paul Ewald, an evolutionary biologist at the University of Louisville, “then we really don’t understand natural selection.”
Yet don’t mistake these findings as evidence that vaccines are dangerous or that they are bound to fail — because undesirable outcomes can be thwarted by using our knowledge of natural selection, too. Evolution might be inevitable, but it can be coaxed in the right direction.
I see why you posted a quack pot, the actual article disagrees with all your best practices. (Also notice how covid is not mentioned in the real article).
Thank you for proving that your original link was full of shit.... like I said....
|
|
RWB
Legend
Posts: 11,809
|
Post by RWB on Sept 3, 2021 13:10:55 GMT
Quanta Magazine is an editorially independent online publication of the Simons Foundation covering developments in physics, mathematics, biology and computer science.
Undark Magazine described Quanta Magazine as "highly regarded for its masterful coverage of complex topics in science and math." The science news aggregator RealClearScience ranked Quanta Magazine No. 1 on its list of "The Top 10 Websites for Science in 2018." In 2020, Quanta Magazine received a National Magazine Award for General Excellence from the American Society of Magazine Editors for its "willingness to tackle some of the toughest and most difficult topics in science and math in a language that is accessible to the lay reader without condescension or oversimplification."
The articles in the magazine are freely available to read online. Several publications like Scientific American, Wired, The Atlantic, and The Washington Post, as well as international science publications like Spektrum der Wissenschaft, have reprinted articles from Quanta Magazine.
Immunization is also making once-rare or nonexistent genetic variants of pathogens more prevalent, presumably because vaccine-primed antibodies can’t as easily recognize and attack shape-shifters that look different from vaccine strains. And vaccines being developed against some of the world’s wilier pathogens — malaria, HIV, anthrax — are based on strategies that could, according to evolutionary models and lab experiments, encourage pathogens to become even more dangerous.
THAT'S the actual source of what the article writer was talking about, and it sure as hell ain't the National Enquirer.
See how stupid you look when you attack the messenger rather than dissecting the message?
Evolutionary biologists aren’t surprised that this is happening. A vaccine is a novel selection pressure placed on a pathogen, and if the vaccine does not eradicate its target completely, then the remaining pathogens with the greatest fitness — those able to survive, somehow, in an immunized world — will become more common. “If you don’t have these pathogens evolving in response to vaccines,” said Paul Ewald, an evolutionary biologist at the University of Louisville, “then we really don’t understand natural selection.”
Yet don’t mistake these findings as evidence that vaccines are dangerous or that they are bound to fail — because undesirable outcomes can be thwarted by using our knowledge of natural selection, too. Evolution might be inevitable, but it can be coaxed in the right direction.
I see why you posted a quack pot, the actual article disagrees with all your best practices. (Also notice how covid is not mentioned in the real article).
Thank you for proving that your original link was full of shit.... like I said....
Another Atreyu post that shouts out HEY LOOK AT ME I'M STUPID
|
|
|
Post by atreyu on Sept 3, 2021 13:19:58 GMT
Evolutionary biologists aren’t surprised that this is happening. A vaccine is a novel selection pressure placed on a pathogen, and if the vaccine does not eradicate its target completely, then the remaining pathogens with the greatest fitness — those able to survive, somehow, in an immunized world — will become more common. “If you don’t have these pathogens evolving in response to vaccines,” said Paul Ewald, an evolutionary biologist at the University of Louisville, “then we really don’t understand natural selection.”
Yet don’t mistake these findings as evidence that vaccines are dangerous or that they are bound to fail — because undesirable outcomes can be thwarted by using our knowledge of natural selection, too. Evolution might be inevitable, but it can be coaxed in the right direction.
I see why you posted a quack pot, the actual article disagrees with all your best practices. (Also notice how covid is not mentioned in the real article).
Thank you for proving that your original link was full of shit.... like I said....
Another Atreyu post that shouts out HEY LOOK AT ME I'M STUPID
"If this all sounds terribly scary, keep a few things in mind. Many pathogens, including measles, do not seem to be evolving as a population in response to their vaccines. Second, experimental data from a lab, such as the malaria study described above, don’t necessarily predict what will happen in the much more complex landscape of the real world. And third, researchers concerned with vaccine-driven evolution stress that the phenomenon is not in any way an argument against vaccination or its value; it’s just a consequence that needs to be considered, and one that can potentially be avoided. By thinking through how a pathogen population might respond to a vaccine, scientists can potentially make tweaks before it happens. They might even be able to design vaccines that encourage pathogens to become less dangerous over time."
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 3, 2021 13:22:56 GMT
Evolutionary biologists aren’t surprised that this is happening. A vaccine is a novel selection pressure placed on a pathogen, and if the vaccine does not eradicate its target completely, then the remaining pathogens with the greatest fitness — those able to survive, somehow, in an immunized world — will become more common. “If you don’t have these pathogens evolving in response to vaccines,” said Paul Ewald, an evolutionary biologist at the University of Louisville, “then we really don’t understand natural selection.”
Yet don’t mistake these findings as evidence that vaccines are dangerous or that they are bound to fail — because undesirable outcomes can be thwarted by using our knowledge of natural selection, too. Evolution might be inevitable, but it can be coaxed in the right direction.
I see why you posted a quack pot, the actual article disagrees with all your best practices. (Also notice how covid is not mentioned in the real article).
Thank you for proving that your original link was full of shit.... like I said....
Another Atreyu post that shouts out HEY LOOK AT ME I'M STUPID That drone does seem to be proud of that fact, which is typical of most liberals. As we say...."they don't know no better. Bless their hearts"
“It isn't so much that liberals are ignorant. It's just that they know so many things that aren't so.” ― Ronald Reagan
|
|