thor
Legend
Posts: 20,530
|
Post by thor on Jul 30, 2020 7:40:23 GMT
Oh noes! Time to round people up and force them to take care of themselves in order to truly address this health issue. That means no more deep fried bacon wrapped twinkies for Cadescove, Oddball, Greg, Atreyu, and Freon. Fatties will now have to get in shape for the good of the land. Clearly servicemembers who have gotten the viruses are 'fatasses'. Because Lomelis sez so!!!!!!!11111elventyone |
|
Odysseus
Legend
Trump = Disaster
Posts: 41,115
|
Post by Odysseus on Jul 30, 2020 7:48:36 GMT
Oh noes! Time to round people up and force them to take care of themselves in order to truly address this health issue. That means no more deep fried bacon wrapped twinkies for Cadescove, Oddball, Greg, Atreyu, and Freon. Fatties will now have to get in shape for the good of the land. Clearly servicemembers who have gotten the viruses are 'fatasses'. Because Lomelis sez so!!!!!!!11111elventyone
Just block the troll.
|
|
|
|
Post by rabbitreborn on Jul 30, 2020 8:29:08 GMT
It’s stunning that the fattest country in earth has a lot of deaths per capita from a respiratory illness that causes severe symptoms in fat people.
Are the Japanese handling the virus well? Or does their population manage their weight better?
|
|
|
|
Post by archie on Jul 30, 2020 13:45:35 GMT
Or, is it Plagiarchiarized?
Do the math dummy. The population of the country, how many sick, how many die, and you will see that the countries with smaller populations have a larger percent of deaths than we do. We have many more people living here than some countries, so their higher percent still shows fewer deaths. Our president is backing all he can to get that vaccine ready. And I am sure he will save the world. Do you get it yet? A country with 100 population has a 10% death rate, so 10 people die. The country with 300 people has a 5% death rate so 15 people die. Who is worse? |
|
|
|
Post by archie on Jul 30, 2020 14:15:23 GMT
So few dead in most Chinese provinces. Taiwan, too: 7 dead out of 23 million. Is Taiwan lying? Or is Taiwan protected by the same magic that protected China (outside of Hubei)?  Ha ha ha ha, looks like they are not allergic to it. |
|
|
|
Post by Lomelis on Jul 31, 2020 2:23:01 GMT
Oh noes! Time to round people up and force them to take care of themselves in order to truly address this health issue. That means no more deep fried bacon wrapped twinkies for Cadescove, Oddball, Greg, Atreyu, and Freon. Fatties will now have to get in shape for the good of the land. Clearly servicemembers who have gotten the viruses are 'fatasses'. Because Lomelis sez so!!!!!!!11111elventyone 🤦♂️ It's like you responded again without actually reading. Assuming you can read that is. |
|
|
|
Post by archie on Jul 31, 2020 2:32:31 GMT
Ha ha ha ha, looks like they are not allergic to it. This is from April in Chicago. Most of the other graphs that come up in search either give raw cases or race cases/total cases (which is not helpful in determining race susceptibility unless we know the race proportions for the locations) rather than race cases/race population. These data, though, make it look like Asians are no less allergic than whites.  You are talking a way over some people’s heads here. They only believe their propaganda stations that never get to technical. |
|
|
|
Post by phillip on Jul 31, 2020 3:32:18 GMT
2.5 times more than the 60k estimation. 1.5 times more than the “good job” 100k estimation. Trump showing his leadership prowess in these trying times by threatening to ban Tik-Tok.
|
|
|
|
Post by Lomelis on Jul 31, 2020 3:49:45 GMT
2.5 times more than the 60k estimation. 1.5 times more than the “good job” 100k estimation. Trump showing his leadership prowess in these trying times by threatening to ban Tik-Tok. Hmm...it's almost like policies shouldn't have been based on these models. Who woulda thunk it? |
|
|
|
Post by phillip on Jul 31, 2020 4:19:37 GMT
2.5 times more than the 60k estimation. 1.5 times more than the “good job” 100k estimation. Trump showing his leadership prowess in these trying times by threatening to ban Tik-Tok. Hmm...it's almost like policies shouldn't have been based on these models. Who woulda thunk it? Sure, we would have been better off with a model based on something closer to what the death toll will be along with a better president. But, you gotta go with what you got and we’ve got a reality tv actor as the Supposed leader of the free world. Oh well. |
|
|
|
Post by Lomelis on Jul 31, 2020 6:14:11 GMT
Hmm...it's almost like policies shouldn't have been based on these models. Who woulda thunk it? Sure, we would have been better off with a model based on something closer to what the death toll will be along with a better president. But, you gotta go with what you got and we’ve got a reality tv actor as the Supposed leader of the free world. Oh well. Or maybe the models were based on a lot of unknown factors that made them worthless? |
|
|
|
Post by phillip on Jul 31, 2020 7:50:57 GMT
Sure, we would have been better off with a model based on something closer to what the death toll will be along with a better president. But, you gotta go with what you got and we’ve got a reality tv actor as the Supposed leader of the free world. Oh well. Or maybe the models were based on a lot of unknown factors that made them worthless?
True, I'm sure the researchers didn't account for the idea that the leader of the country would discourage mask wearing for several months and have such an innate drive to immediately open everything back up while encouraging the ignoring of his own administration's recommendations in doing so. Or insist on attempting indoor pep rallies and conventions filled to max capacity.
I can imagine adding those x-factors have to be made after you are done being flabbergasted at the fact they ever occurred.
|
|
|
|
Post by MojoJojo on Jul 31, 2020 21:25:02 GMT
Some of you may appreciate this...
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 31, 2020 21:38:12 GMT
Some of you may appreciate this... Appreciated and accurate. |
|
|
|
Post by Lomelis on Aug 1, 2020 2:01:00 GMT
Or maybe the models were based on a lot of unknown factors that made them worthless?
True, I'm sure the researchers didn't account for the idea that the leader of the country would discourage mask wearing for several months and have such an innate drive to immediately open everything back up while encouraging the ignoring of his own administration's recommendations in doing so. Or insist on attempting indoor pep rallies and conventions filled to max capacity.
I can imagine adding those x-factors have to be made after you are done being flabbergasted at the fact they ever occurred.
That and other things they didn't actually know about like how dangerous it really is, who would be effected, asymptomatic spread, rate of infection...you know important things. |
|
|
|
Post by MojoJojo on Aug 1, 2020 14:21:42 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by crepe05 on Aug 1, 2020 14:37:36 GMT
Nov 4th no matter who wins, the virus fades into history. That is just not true.
The earliest we will see this go away is likely Spring, 2021.
THIS IS NOT A POLITICAL SITUATION, IT'S A PANDEMIC.
Freon
Of course it's a political situation, whether we are yelling it or just typing it normally. People are in a panic. IMO, take a step back, take a deep breath (with mask on), and everyone calm down just a bit. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 1, 2020 15:19:38 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by freonbale on Aug 1, 2020 16:05:51 GMT
2.5 times more than the 60k estimation. 1.5 times more than the “good job” 100k estimation. Trump showing his leadership prowess in these trying times by threatening to ban Tik-Tok. Hmm...it's almost like policies shouldn't have been based on these models. Who woulda thunk it? Lomelis, you know I do not think highly of your intelligence, so I will understand if you don't respond, but I am curious what your expectation of science actually is.
If we only make decisions on absolute known fact, instead of our best estimate at the time, then no recommendations would ever be made.
What if we took that strategy in war? Only going to battle when we had 100% knowledge of the situation. Or medicine. Only doing surgery when we had 100% knowledge of what we will find when we cut open a human.
It just doesn't work that way. You NEVER know everything. So you compensate by being flexible, by preparing for the worst, and hoping for the best.
I consider this common sense, which is why your statements regarding these models are baffling.
Freon
|
|
|
|
Post by Lomelis on Aug 1, 2020 18:57:22 GMT
Hmm...it's almost like policies shouldn't have been based on these models. Who woulda thunk it? Lomelis, you know I do not think highly of your intelligence, so I will understand if you don't respond, but I am curious what your expectation of science actually is.
If we only make decisions on absolute known fact, instead of our best estimate at the time, then no recommendations would ever be made.
What if we took that strategy in war? Only going to battle when we had 100% knowledge of the situation. Or medicine. Only doing surgery when we had 100% knowledge of what we will find when we cut open a human.
It just doesn't work that way. You NEVER know everything. So you compensate by being flexible, by preparing for the worst, and hoping for the best.
I consider this common sense, which is why your statements regarding these models are baffling.
Freon
Freon. You're a moron. No where did I suggest that we should only make decisions based on absolute certainty. I'm curious. When did you arrive in the US, at what age, and from what country? |
|
