Greg55_99
Legend
Posts: 23,117 
Member is Online
|
Post by Greg55_99 on Jul 6, 2020 19:58:09 GMT
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 6, 2020 19:59:25 GMT
Yeah. Women alone in Central Park shouldn't be afraid of men approaching them and even overtly threatening them. Women are so crazy. Don't they know this is America, 2020? Queshank |
|
Greg55_99
Legend
Posts: 23,117
Member is Online
|
Post by Greg55_99 on Jul 6, 2020 20:00:44 GMT
Yeah. Women alone in Central Park shouldn't be afraid of men approaching them and even overtly threatening them. Women are so crazy. Don't they know this is America, 2020? Queshank
You think she would have called the police on a White man Q?
Greg
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 6, 2020 20:06:39 GMT
Yeah. Women alone in Central Park shouldn't be afraid of men approaching them and even overtly threatening them. Women are so crazy. Don't they know this is America, 2020? Queshank
You think she would have called the police on a White man Q?
Greg
If said white man had approached her, and threatened her as this black man did ... Yes. Do you think women are so safe when they're alone in Central Park that that's unreasonable? Queshank |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 6, 2020 20:18:06 GMT
You think she would have called the police on a White man Q?
Greg
If said white man had approached her, and threatened her as this black man did ... Yes. Do you think women are so safe when they're alone in Central Park that that's unreasonable? Queshank How did he threaten her? What did he do that was wrong? |
|
|
|
Post by william on Jul 6, 2020 20:24:55 GMT
If said white man had approached her, and threatened her as this black man did ... Yes. Do you think women are so safe when they're alone in Central Park that that's unreasonable? Queshank How did he threaten her? What did he do that was wrong? I suppose Q means that the man was black. That can be threatening to some. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 6, 2020 21:01:43 GMT
How did he threaten her? What did he do that was wrong? I suppose Q means that the man was black. That can be threatening to some. In Central Park that's an immediate guilty. Just ask the Central Park Five and donald trump. |
|
|
|
Post by MojoJojo on Jul 6, 2020 21:06:21 GMT
Yeah, he was intimidating the shit out of her, lucky he didn't get maced and shot!
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 6, 2020 21:09:33 GMT
If said white man had approached her, and threatened her as this black man did ... Yes. Do you think women are so safe when they're alone in Central Park that that's unreasonable? Queshank How did he threaten her? What did he do that was wrong? By his own admission, by saying "I'll take care of your dog if you won't" and starting to call the dog over. Why wouldn't you think that is threatening behavior towards a woman alone in Central Park in *this* specific case? Queshank |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 6, 2020 21:11:43 GMT
Yeah, he was intimidating the shit out of her, lucky he didn't get maced and shot!
Why do these videos always start AFTER confrontations have already occurred? And why ..with that obvious and egregious lack ... are they so readily accepted as evidence of one party's guilt? Queshank |
|
|
|
Post by MojoJojo on Jul 6, 2020 21:16:18 GMT
Yeah, he was intimidating the shit out of her, lucky he didn't get maced and shot!
Why do these videos always start AFTER confrontations have already occurred? And why ..with that obvious and egregious lack ... are they so readily accepted as evidence of one party's guilt? Queshank If you have video of what happened before this part, please share. Or audio. A transcript from the case would be a good indicator of what she claimed, but audio/video would be better. Until then, most of us are judging her based on the limited context of the above. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 6, 2020 21:22:04 GMT
Why do these videos always start AFTER confrontations have already occurred? And why ..with that obvious and egregious lack ... are they so readily accepted as evidence of one party's guilt? Queshank If you have video of what happened before this part, please share. Or audio. A transcript from the case would be a good indicator of what she claimed, but audio/video would be better. Until then, most of us are judging her based on the limited context of the above. I know. You're judging her based on limited context, based on a video that starts AFTER the altercation. And I'm asking why? There is no video before it. The fact that it's absence leads you to think this video is incriminating or revealing in any way is ... well ... disturbing. The only thing I have to go on is the words of the guy himself ... stated on facebook as he shared his outraged story of the day and later clarified in an interview on NPR as "I carry dog treats with me just for situations like this." But she didn't know he had treats he carries with him for dogs, did she? She only knew there was a guy mansplaining things to her in Central Park when she was alone. And we also know she's a leftist. Which means she probably consumes roughly 30 to 50 articles per year about how she's in danger when she's out alone in public. Queshank |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 6, 2020 21:22:57 GMT
You guys don't dig past the surface do you?
And that is his side of the story. You know he put it in the most favorable light. Even in the most favorable light he's threatening her dog. Then the video begins. So what you saw was her reaction to him threatening her dog. Was she right to be there with her dog off leash? No. But threatening the dog was highly inappropriate and Karen like thing to do.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 6, 2020 21:25:17 GMT
"ME: Look, if you're going to do what you want, I'm going to do what I want, but you're not going to like it."
And there's the line any decent attorney uses to get his client a not guilty verdict.
Queshank
|
|
|
|
Post by MojoJojo on Jul 6, 2020 21:27:39 GMT
When you find yourself defending Karens with the weakest of arguments.
So incredibly threatening! He should have been arrested and charged with...something!
|
|
RWB
Legend
Posts: 12,762
|
Post by RWB on Jul 6, 2020 21:29:53 GMT
the bird brain threatend her dog case will be dismissed. |
|
|
|
Post by jasmine on Jul 6, 2020 21:32:03 GMT
If you honestly felt threatened, how can you be charged with falsely reporting an incident?
This is just another overreaction to this BLM silliness. It’s stupid.
|
|
|
|
Post by MojoJojo on Jul 6, 2020 21:36:27 GMT
If you honestly felt threatened, how can you be charged with falsely reporting an incident? This is just another overreaction to this BLM silliness. It’s stupid.
Because there was no incident.
Her "feelings" were hurt by being chastised and she countered in classic Karen fashion, which meant cops had to go investigate a non-crime.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 6, 2020 21:36:44 GMT
And yes... I heard this whole story on NPR. And thought "Jesus. That guy just admitted he threatened her on national radio."
And yet I still find leftists sharing this after the fact video in a histrionic frenzy.
Queshank
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 6, 2020 21:37:50 GMT
When you find yourself defending Karens with the weakest of arguments. So incredibly threatening! He should have been arrested and charged with...something! She's a leftist Mojo. Which means she consumes literature that tells her she's a victim and in danger from men at least 30 to 50 times a year. So yeah. She felt threatened when he said "If you're not going to do something about it, I'm going to, and you're not going to like it." Why wouldn't she like him giving her dog treats? Queshank |
|
