|
|
Post by stugatze on Nov 14, 2024 2:44:08 GMT
Isn't Karma something?   Rats Flee Sinking DOJ Ship
By: Julie Kelly
November 13, 2024 The scales of justice have a chance to recalibrate following Donald Trump’s resounding victory and the departure of key figures at the Biden/Harris Department of Justice.
The New York Times today confirmed Special Counsel Jack Smith and his team of prosecutors plan to resign before Donald Trump takes office in January. In what must have been a painful article to write, Devlin Barrett and Glenn Thrush, two reliable mouthpieces for the Department of Justice, said Smith’s office is “drawing up its plan for how to end the cases” against the incoming president. It is also unclear whether Smith will file a confidential report summarizing the special counsels’ work, a requirement under the DOJ special counsel rules.
Smith further “finds himself on the defensive,” according to the Times, as House Republicans prepare to investigate the investigators. “Republican lawmakers told Justice Department officials who had worked on the Trump cases to preserve all of their communications for investigators,” Barrett and Thrush wrote. “That is a sure sign that a new balance of power in Washington will make Mr. Smith among those being hunted by congressional investigators and others.”
|
|
petep
Legend
Posts: 25,956
|
Post by petep on Nov 14, 2024 10:42:39 GMT
Isn't Karma something? Rats Flee Sinking DOJ Ship
By: Julie Kelly
November 13, 2024 The scales of justice have a chance to recalibrate following Donald Trump’s resounding victory and the departure of key figures at the Biden/Harris Department of Justice.
The New York Times today confirmed Special Counsel Jack Smith and his team of prosecutors plan to resign before Donald Trump takes office in January. In what must have been a painful article to write, Devlin Barrett and Glenn Thrush, two reliable mouthpieces for the Department of Justice, said Smith’s office is “drawing up its plan for how to end the cases” against the incoming president. It is also unclear whether Smith will file a confidential report summarizing the special counsels’ work, a requirement under the DOJ special counsel rules.
Smith further “finds himself on the defensive,” according to the Times, as House Republicans prepare to investigate the investigators. “Republican lawmakers told Justice Department officials who had worked on the Trump cases to preserve all of their communications for investigators,” Barrett and Thrush wrote. “That is a sure sign that a new balance of power in Washington will make Mr. Smith among those being hunted by congressional investigators and others.”
Nuremberg lite |
|
|
|
Post by stugatze on Nov 14, 2024 12:40:31 GMT
Isn't Karma something? Rats Flee Sinking DOJ Ship
By: Julie Kelly
November 13, 2024 The scales of justice have a chance to recalibrate following Donald Trump’s resounding victory and the departure of key figures at the Biden/Harris Department of Justice.
The New York Times today confirmed Special Counsel Jack Smith and his team of prosecutors plan to resign before Donald Trump takes office in January. In what must have been a painful article to write, Devlin Barrett and Glenn Thrush, two reliable mouthpieces for the Department of Justice, said Smith’s office is “drawing up its plan for how to end the cases” against the incoming president. It is also unclear whether Smith will file a confidential report summarizing the special counsels’ work, a requirement under the DOJ special counsel rules.
Smith further “finds himself on the defensive,” according to the Times, as House Republicans prepare to investigate the investigators. “Republican lawmakers told Justice Department officials who had worked on the Trump cases to preserve all of their communications for investigators,” Barrett and Thrush wrote. “That is a sure sign that a new balance of power in Washington will make Mr. Smith among those being hunted by congressional investigators and others.”
Nuremberg lite
______________________________________________________________________________
Indeed, .. and much needed when one considers the democrat party's use of the Justice Department to 'weaponize' it for the sole purpose of destroying it's political adversaries, inventing phony crimes, and jailing political enemies. 
All that filthy shit backfired on the democrat party, and the democrats have nobody to blame but themselves and their corrupt dishonest liberal socialist news media. 
|
|
|
|
Post by freonbale on Nov 14, 2024 18:32:18 GMT
Isn't Karma something? Rats Flee Sinking DOJ Ship
By: Julie Kelly
November 13, 2024 The scales of justice have a chance to recalibrate following Donald Trump’s resounding victory and the departure of key figures at the Biden/Harris Department of Justice.
The New York Times today confirmed Special Counsel Jack Smith and his team of prosecutors plan to resign before Donald Trump takes office in January. In what must have been a painful article to write, Devlin Barrett and Glenn Thrush, two reliable mouthpieces for the Department of Justice, said Smith’s office is “drawing up its plan for how to end the cases” against the incoming president. It is also unclear whether Smith will file a confidential report summarizing the special counsels’ work, a requirement under the DOJ special counsel rules.
Smith further “finds himself on the defensive,” according to the Times, as House Republicans prepare to investigate the investigators. “Republican lawmakers told Justice Department officials who had worked on the Trump cases to preserve all of their communications for investigators,” Barrett and Thrush wrote. “That is a sure sign that a new balance of power in Washington will make Mr. Smith among those being hunted by congressional investigators and others.”
No, Smith knows that when Donald is in power, he will revoke the case, even though there is plenty of evidence to show Donald's guilt. You put the most corrupt president in charge of the very department that should be prosecuting him, and those like him. And you somehow think that makes us MORE law abiding? More just? What you've really done is open the doors to even more corruption, and that is exactly what I expect to see. Since Smith knows no case will be allowed, he has switched tactics, submitting all the evidence he would have used in the case to Garland, who (hopefully) will release it to the public. And that means history will record what Donald actually is, what he was able to do, and who supported him. I accept that Harris lost, but I am 100% still convinced I'm on the right side of history and you are not. Freon |
|
|
|
Post by stugatze on Nov 15, 2024 15:31:24 GMT
Isn't Karma something? Rats Flee Sinking DOJ Ship
By: Julie Kelly
November 13, 2024 The scales of justice have a chance to recalibrate following Donald Trump’s resounding victory and the departure of key figures at the Biden/Harris Department of Justice.
The New York Times today confirmed Special Counsel Jack Smith and his team of prosecutors plan to resign before Donald Trump takes office in January. In what must have been a painful article to write, Devlin Barrett and Glenn Thrush, two reliable mouthpieces for the Department of Justice, said Smith’s office is “drawing up its plan for how to end the cases” against the incoming president. It is also unclear whether Smith will file a confidential report summarizing the special counsels’ work, a requirement under the DOJ special counsel rules.
Smith further “finds himself on the defensive,” according to the Times, as House Republicans prepare to investigate the investigators. “Republican lawmakers told Justice Department officials who had worked on the Trump cases to preserve all of their communications for investigators,” Barrett and Thrush wrote. “That is a sure sign that a new balance of power in Washington will make Mr. Smith among those being hunted by congressional investigators and others.”
No, Smith knows that when Donald is in power, he will revoke the case, even though there is plenty of evidence to show Donald's guilt. You put the most corrupt president in charge of the very department that should be prosecuting him, and those like him. And you somehow think that makes us MORE law abiding? More just? What you've really done is open the doors to even more corruption, and that is exactly what I expect to see. Since Smith knows no case will be allowed, he has switched tactics, submitting all the evidence he would have used in the case to Garland, who (hopefully) will release it to the public. And that means history will record what Donald actually is, what he was able to do, and who supported him. I accept that Harris lost, but I am 100% still convinced I'm on the right side of history and you are not. Freon
_______________________________________________________________________________
Dear Leftist Freebie, .. There is LOTS of evidence that Trump's charges were FRIVOLOUS and BULLSHIT and STRETCHED the f-ing LAW just to even TRY to indict him on, .. and that his Civil Rights were NOT always in play for him!
Trump's charges WOULD have been TOTALLY expunged by the SCOTUS, .. because, they even SAW what the filthy democrat party LAWFARE was doing to him, .. to DESTROY his Potus Candidacy for 2024, but, it all BACKFIRED on them!
They HAD democrat party prosecutors running for office PROMISING to 'GET TRUMP'.. if they were elected, and that is BEFORE he was even investigated by them. So much for HONESTY, INTEGRITY and the RULE OF LAW!
|
|
|
|
Post by freonbale on Nov 15, 2024 16:40:45 GMT
No, Smith knows that when Donald is in power, he will revoke the case, even though there is plenty of evidence to show Donald's guilt. You put the most corrupt president in charge of the very department that should be prosecuting him, and those like him. And you somehow think that makes us MORE law abiding? More just? What you've really done is open the doors to even more corruption, and that is exactly what I expect to see. Since Smith knows no case will be allowed, he has switched tactics, submitting all the evidence he would have used in the case to Garland, who (hopefully) will release it to the public. And that means history will record what Donald actually is, what he was able to do, and who supported him. I accept that Harris lost, but I am 100% still convinced I'm on the right side of history and you are not. Freon
_______________________________________________________________________________
Dear Leftist Freebie, .. There is LOTS of evidence that Trump's charges were FRIVOLOUS and BULLSHIT and STRETCHED the f-ing LAW just to even TRY to indict him on, .. and that his Civil Rights were NOT always in play for him!
Trump's charges WOULD have been TOTALLY expunged by the SCOTUS, .. because, they even SAW what the filthy democrat party LAWFARE was doing to him, .. to DESTROY his Potus Candidacy for 2024, but, it all BACKFIRED on them!
They HAD democrat party prosecutors running for office PROMISING to 'GET TRUMP'.. if they were elected, and that is BEFORE he was even investigated by them. So much for HONESTY, INTEGRITY and the RULE OF LAW!
There is nothing wrong with politicians running on a platform of holding criminals accountable, Donald being one of them. You seem to keep ignoring the evidence. HUGE amounts of it, directly incriminating Donald. That's not 'lawfare'. It's simply holding someone with a reasonable likelihood of guilt, accountable. If there was no evidence, or if the evidence was meager, I could see your points, but that is the opposite of what exists. And we're going to see it tall, when Smith presents his (mandatory) report to Garland, who will (hopefully) release it to the public. And then history will vindicate what I am saying. Freon |
|
|
|
Post by Lomelis on Nov 15, 2024 16:49:34 GMT
_______________________________________________________________________________
Dear Leftist Freebie, .. There is LOTS of evidence that Trump's charges were FRIVOLOUS and BULLSHIT and STRETCHED the f-ing LAW just to even TRY to indict him on, .. and that his Civil Rights were NOT always in play for him!
Trump's charges WOULD have been TOTALLY expunged by the SCOTUS, .. because, they even SAW what the filthy democrat party LAWFARE was doing to him, .. to DESTROY his Potus Candidacy for 2024, but, it all BACKFIRED on them!
They HAD democrat party prosecutors running for office PROMISING to 'GET TRUMP'.. if they were elected, and that is BEFORE he was even investigated by them. So much for HONESTY, INTEGRITY and the RULE OF LAW!
There is nothing wrong with politicians running on a platform of holding criminals accountable, Donald being one of them. You seem to keep ignoring the evidence. HUGE amounts of it, directly incriminating Donald. That's not 'lawfare'. It's simply holding someone with a reasonable likelihood of guilt, accountable. If there was no evidence, or if the evidence was meager, I could see your points, but that is the opposite of what exists. And we're going to see it tall, when Smith presents his (mandatory) report to Garland, who will (hopefully) release it to the public. And then history will vindicate what I am saying. Freon How can you know there is just so much evidence incriminating him if it hasn't been released to the public? |
|
thor
Legend
Posts: 20,403
|
Post by thor on Nov 15, 2024 19:31:30 GMT
There is nothing wrong with politicians running on a platform of holding criminals accountable, Donald being one of them. You seem to keep ignoring the evidence. HUGE amounts of it, directly incriminating Donald. That's not 'lawfare'. It's simply holding someone with a reasonable likelihood of guilt, accountable. If there was no evidence, or if the evidence was meager, I could see your points, but that is the opposite of what exists. And we're going to see it tall, when Smith presents his (mandatory) report to Garland, who will (hopefully) release it to the public. And then history will vindicate what I am saying. Freon How can you know there is just so much evidence incriminating him if it hasn't been released to the public? Shitbag tells us he doesn't understand how criminal investigations work. Shitbag also ignores reams of evidence already released to the public. How many Marines went without due to your incompetence, Shitbag? |
|
|
|
Post by Lomelis on Nov 15, 2024 19:44:36 GMT
There is nothing wrong with politicians running on a platform of holding criminals accountable, Donald being one of them. You seem to keep ignoring the evidence. HUGE amounts of it, directly incriminating Donald. That's not 'lawfare'. It's simply holding someone with a reasonable likelihood of guilt, accountable. If there was no evidence, or if the evidence was meager, I could see your points, but that is the opposite of what exists. And we're going to see it tall, when Smith presents his (mandatory) report to Garland, who will (hopefully) release it to the public. And then history will vindicate what I am saying. Freon How can you know there is just so much evidence incriminating him if it hasn't been released to the public? Pay attention NeanderTard. I know that logic and reason just isn't your thing. Igor is saying that there is tons of evidence proving Trump's guilt but at the same time is saying he will be vindicated once it is released to the public. Get it yet? Of course you don't. |
|
|
|
Post by freonbale on Nov 15, 2024 21:07:19 GMT
There is nothing wrong with politicians running on a platform of holding criminals accountable, Donald being one of them. You seem to keep ignoring the evidence. HUGE amounts of it, directly incriminating Donald. That's not 'lawfare'. It's simply holding someone with a reasonable likelihood of guilt, accountable. If there was no evidence, or if the evidence was meager, I could see your points, but that is the opposite of what exists. And we're going to see it tall, when Smith presents his (mandatory) report to Garland, who will (hopefully) release it to the public. And then history will vindicate what I am saying. Freon How can you know there is just so much evidence incriminating him if it hasn't been released to the public? I have thoroughly tracked his cases for years. Freon |
|
|
|
Post by atreyu on Nov 15, 2024 21:35:37 GMT
There is nothing wrong with politicians running on a platform of holding criminals accountable, Donald being one of them. You seem to keep ignoring the evidence. HUGE amounts of it, directly incriminating Donald. That's not 'lawfare'. It's simply holding someone with a reasonable likelihood of guilt, accountable. If there was no evidence, or if the evidence was meager, I could see your points, but that is the opposite of what exists. And we're going to see it tall, when Smith presents his (mandatory) report to Garland, who will (hopefully) release it to the public. And then history will vindicate what I am saying. Freon How can you know there is just so much evidence incriminating him if it hasn't been released to the public?
Wow, you have eyes, but there's nothing behind them. Oh yeah "don't believe your eyes and ears". You took that to heart.
|
|
|
|
Post by Lomelis on Nov 16, 2024 23:46:48 GMT
How can you know there is just so much evidence incriminating him if it hasn't been released to the public? I have thoroughly tracked his cases for years. Freon Where are you getting information about this case if the information hasn't been released to the public? |
|
|
|
Post by Lomelis on Nov 16, 2024 23:53:06 GMT
How can you know there is just so much evidence incriminating him if it hasn't been released to the public?
Wow, you have eyes, but there's nothing behind them. Oh yeah "don't believe your eyes and ears". You took that to heart.
Here's your chance to lay it out there. Ready, go! |
|
