|
|
Post by MojoJojo on Oct 25, 2024 20:03:18 GMT
Hes making fun of you, retard. Clarification, I'm making fun of Magical POTUS syndrome. Far too much gets attributed to the office that is clearly outside its direct control or influence. Gas is $4.00/gal?! Stupid President!! :great anger emoji: |
|
|
|
Post by HolyMoly on Oct 25, 2024 21:04:21 GMT
It's always fun to see billionaires punking the goobers.
More fun to watch the goobers falling for it.
|
|
|
|
Post by RinsePrius on Oct 26, 2024 4:03:32 GMT
In 1938, Benito Mussolini closed off a wheat field & did a photo shoot showing him harvesting hay in order to portray himself as a common working man. The event was part of his “Battle of the Grain” initiative, aimed at making Italy self-sufficient in wheat production.  That was probably a smart move. Seemed authentic for him, as the son of a socialist blacksmith from a small village. Trump's is also likely a smart marketing move. He didn't go in with the same intention as Mussolini, as Trump did not portray himself as a working class individual. He went in with a suit, and looked and acted like an elite that just enjoys being around working class people. It also seemed natural and comfortable for him. He was also trolling Harris, but doing so in a fun way. Even wishing Harris a happy birthday. Harris, on the other hand, always seems inauthentic. As the daughter of two college professors at prestigious schools, and growing up in places like Berkeley and Montreal, she doesn't seem comfortable amongst the people. And her recent discussions about the difficulty of "raising children" also seems completely inauthentic. But she doesn't know what else to do because her life experience doesn't relate to people in middle America at all, but she's trying to pretend that she's one of them. There might be something to the how authentic they come across but I think much of it is a product of how we feel about the candidates. Mussolini's striving for national self-sufficiency in agricultural production, to the point of autarky, was misguided but I have no doubt the marketing stunt was smart as far as it goes. Much like Trump at Mcdonald's. But as for me, I'll take the inauthentic, relatively sane alternative to both of these gesticulating bozos. |
|
|
|
Post by RinsePrius on Oct 26, 2024 4:20:44 GMT
I do not understand why anyone would want the democrat party in charge. Forget the food prices. We are invaded and paying for that too. We are in danger, from within the country and from outside the country. I know the democrat party does not know what to do to turn things around. Especially who they have running for president and vice president. The people did not pick them to run. I am sure there are a lot of democrats leaning people that are smart and see what is going on and they don't like it either. Sorry to say, not many of them post here. It's not that we think the Democratic party is great, or good, or something pure and ideal. Hell no. It's far too conservative economically The problem you have is MAGA is viewed as much worse. Taxes, tariffs, inflation, interest rates, these things are all fine to debate and disagree about. But the peaceful transfer of power and the constitution are not up for debate. These are essential. And MAGA is seen by liberals, independents, moderates & many in the GOP, as a threat to those essential elements. |
|
|
|
Post by rabbitreborn on Oct 26, 2024 14:46:08 GMT
That was probably a smart move. Seemed authentic for him, as the son of a socialist blacksmith from a small village. Trump's is also likely a smart marketing move. He didn't go in with the same intention as Mussolini, as Trump did not portray himself as a working class individual. He went in with a suit, and looked and acted like an elite that just enjoys being around working class people. It also seemed natural and comfortable for him. He was also trolling Harris, but doing so in a fun way. Even wishing Harris a happy birthday. Harris, on the other hand, always seems inauthentic. As the daughter of two college professors at prestigious schools, and growing up in places like Berkeley and Montreal, she doesn't seem comfortable amongst the people. And her recent discussions about the difficulty of "raising children" also seems completely inauthentic. But she doesn't know what else to do because her life experience doesn't relate to people in middle America at all, but she's trying to pretend that she's one of them. There might be something to the how authentic they come across but I think much of it is a product of how we feel about the candidates. Mussolini's striving for national self-sufficiency in agricultural production, to the point of autarky, was misguided but I have no doubt the marketing stunt was smart as far as it goes. Much like Trump at Mcdonald's. But as for me, I'll take the inauthentic, relatively sane alternative to both of these gesticulating bozos. Nah. Trump seemed at ease and authentic. Harris, laughing hysterically about the difficulties of “raising children” comes across as inauthentic and awkward. An imposter. That’s not a prediction of who is going to win. But we all know how unlikeable Kamala was prior to be suddenly anointed with an explosive marketing blitz. It’s a matter of public record. She could easily win, but let’s not pretend she’s likeable. |
|
|
|
Post by RinsePrius on Oct 26, 2024 14:51:18 GMT
There might be something to the how authentic they come across but I think much of it is a product of how we feel about the candidates. Mussolini's striving for national self-sufficiency in agricultural production, to the point of autarky, was misguided but I have no doubt the marketing stunt was smart as far as it goes. Much like Trump at Mcdonald's. But as for me, I'll take the inauthentic, relatively sane alternative to both of these gesticulating bozos. Nah. Trump seemed at ease and authentic. Harris, laughing hysterically about the difficulties of “raising children” comes across as inauthentic and awkward. An imposter. That’s not a prediction of who is going to win. But we all know how unlikeable Kamala was prior to be suddenly anointed with an explosive marketing blitz. It’s a matter of public record. She could easily win, but let’s not pretend she’s likeable. Perhaps he did but he comes across very inauthentic when he speaks about tariffs, election integrity, how horrible immigrants are, the horrible Biden economy. None of that talk seems authentic to me. But I'll grant that Trump does seem authentic to his supporters, so I'll go with the inauthentic, unlikable sane candidate. |
|
|
|
Post by rabbitreborn on Oct 26, 2024 15:03:58 GMT
Nah. Trump seemed at ease and authentic. Harris, laughing hysterically about the difficulties of “raising children” comes across as inauthentic and awkward. An imposter. That’s not a prediction of who is going to win. But we all know how unlikeable Kamala was prior to be suddenly anointed with an explosive marketing blitz. It’s a matter of public record. She could easily win, but let’s not pretend she’s likeable. Perhaps he did but he comes across very inauthentic when he speaks about tariffs, election integrity, how horrible immigrants are, the horrible Biden economy. None of that talk seems authentic to me. But I'll grant that Trump does seem authentic to his supporters, so I'll go with the inauthentic, unlikable sane candidate. There is a sanity there, as she knows the deal. She knows that she won’t be expected to make decisions. She’ll be a puppet, if elected. Like Biden. Something to be said for that. Trump? More like Nixon or JFK. He’s crazy enough to believe that he would actually be the president if he wins. |
|
|
|
Post by Lomelis on Oct 26, 2024 19:11:42 GMT
Hes making fun of you, retard. Clarification, I'm making fun of Magical POTUS syndrome. Far too much gets attributed to the office that is clearly outside its direct control or influence. Gas is $4.00/gal?! Stupid President!! :great anger emoji: The President is going to be seen as the chief representative of a political ideology across all levels of government. Many will believe that the President will directly control numerous issues that affect our day to day lives when he really doesn't. But his policies and statements can influence or nudge things in certain directions and many of the lower level and local politicians that do have more of a direct effect on us support their ideological representative and vise versa. Take for instance the whole trans thing with female sports and bathrooms. The President doesn't really have any direct authority over any of that except for maybe title 9 but ultimately these are cultural and mostly local issues. All he would need to do is come out and say, "Women are adult human females, biological males should not be playing women's sports or using women's bathrooms. And an individual cannot be a "they/them" as you cannot be more than one person you dumb tools." He doesn't need to make any executive orders, no new laws need to be passed, just the power of the statement alone. He would get pushback from the freaks but ultimately this would go a long way in returning sanity to the left as the moderates and those afraid to speak out would now feel emboldened to put their loons in check. |
|
|
|
Post by Fiddler on Oct 26, 2024 19:39:27 GMT
Perhaps he did but he comes across very inauthentic when he speaks about tariffs, election integrity, how horrible immigrants are, the horrible Biden economy. None of that talk seems authentic to me. But I'll grant that Trump does seem authentic to his supporters, so I'll go with the inauthentic, unlikable sane candidate. There is a sanity there, as she knows the deal. She knows that she won’t be expected to make decisions. She’ll be a puppet, if elected. Like Biden. Something to be said for that. OMG.. You actually think Trump was the one making decisions .,. LMAO.. I knew you guys were gullible but DAMN .. |
|
|
|
Post by rabbitreborn on Oct 26, 2024 19:44:48 GMT
There is a sanity there, as she knows the deal. She knows that she won’t be expected to make decisions. She’ll be a puppet, if elected. Like Biden. Something to be said for that. OMG.. You actually think Trump was the one making decisions .,. LMAO.. I knew you guys were gullible but DAMN .. No. He wasn’t. But he thought he deserved to. Fucking lunatic, right? |
|
|
|
Post by Fiddler on Oct 26, 2024 19:53:59 GMT
OMG.. You actually think Trump was the one making decisions .,. LMAO.. I knew you guys were gullible but DAMN .. No. He wasn’t. But he thought he deserved to. Fucking lunatic, right? Fortunately there were people there that stopped him from nuking the hurricanes ..
You know you may be right .. maybe he doesn't deserve to make decisions ..
|
|
|
|
Post by rabbitreborn on Oct 26, 2024 21:18:12 GMT
No. He wasn’t. But he thought he deserved to. Fucking lunatic, right? Fortunately there were people there that stopped him from nuking the hurricanes ..
You know you may be right .. maybe he doesn't deserve to make decisions ..
He was just about to do it, but heroic bureaucrats saved us at the last minute. Believe it all. Nobody else does except for Democrat party loyalists at this point. 30% have any faith in the corporate media. That’s you. |
|
