|
Post by Greg55_99 on Oct 19, 2024 17:09:18 GMT
|
|
|
Post by Fiddler on Oct 19, 2024 17:43:16 GMT
Maybe he'll have the Air Force bomb them ..
|
|
|
Post by johnnybgood on Oct 19, 2024 19:06:18 GMT
Then he needs to stop talking. Thats the worst ads.
|
|
|
Post by rabbitreborn on Oct 19, 2024 22:29:11 GMT
Weak? But he’s going to perform so many atrocities.
|
|
|
Post by rabbitreborn on Oct 19, 2024 22:29:48 GMT
Maybe he'll have the Air Force bomb them .. I’ll bet you he uses the military to murder fewer American civilians than Obama. $10,000. Want to make that bet?
|
|
|
Post by DaveJavu on Oct 20, 2024 4:09:10 GMT
Maybe he'll have the Air Force bomb them .. I’ll bet you he uses the military to murder fewer American civilians than Obama. $10,000. Want to make that bet? How the fuck will you settle a bet like that, not to mention collect on it?
|
|
|
Post by rabbitreborn on Oct 20, 2024 10:44:26 GMT
I’ll bet you he uses the military to murder fewer American civilians than Obama. $10,000. Want to make that bet? How the fuck will you settle a bet like that, not to mention collect on it? I go in to the bet genuinely. There are ways to accomplish this. Alter the bet if you’d like, I’ll likely accept whatever stakes you propose. Including permanent banning from the forum for the loser.
|
|
|
Post by DaveJavu on Oct 20, 2024 11:22:48 GMT
How the fuck will you settle a bet like that, not to mention collect on it? I go in to the bet genuinely. There are ways to accomplish this. Alter the bet if you’d like, I’ll likely accept whatever stakes you propose. Including permanent banning from the forum for the loser. "$10,000" is a little high to go with the honor system, don't you think? I am not betting, definitely not for that kind of money and least of all under these conditions. I am just exposing your scheme for what it is.
|
|
|
Post by rabbitreborn on Oct 20, 2024 11:41:53 GMT
I go in to the bet genuinely. There are ways to accomplish this. Alter the bet if you’d like, I’ll likely accept whatever stakes you propose. Including permanent banning from the forum for the loser. "$10,000" is a little high to go with the honor system, don't you think? I am not betting, definitely not for that kind of money and least of all under these conditions. I am just exposing your scheme for what it is. I seem oddly open to counters for somebody conducting a scheme.
|
|
|
Post by DaveJavu on Oct 20, 2024 12:42:15 GMT
"$10,000" is a little high to go with the honor system, don't you think? I am not betting, definitely not for that kind of money and least of all under these conditions. I am just exposing your scheme for what it is. I seem oddly open to counters for somebody conducting a scheme. The scheme, or the bluff if you will, is that you know very well that a bet like that can never be made and so you wish to appear surer of yourself than you actually are.
|
|
|
Post by rabbitreborn on Oct 20, 2024 13:38:02 GMT
I seem oddly open to counters for somebody conducting a scheme. The scheme, or the bluff if you will, is that you know very well that a bet like that can never be made and so you wish to appear surer of yourself than you actually are. Whatever you want to bet. At the least, if I renege, you’ll have that over me as well. I suppose all predictions made on this forum follow this line. If you want to have a little conniption about this one specifically, you’re welcome to do so. I actually believe it’s those (including Harris and Walz) that are suggesting that Trump is going to use the military to attack his political opposition are the ones playing games and running schemes. Or “marketing” as it is otherwise known to some.
|
|
thor
Legend
Posts: 20,480
|
Post by thor on Oct 20, 2024 14:56:30 GMT
Maybe he'll have the Air Force bomb them .. I’ll bet you he uses the military to murder fewer American civilians than Obama. $10,000. Want to make that bet? Fobbit is now on record as a supporter of terrorism.
|
|
|
Post by rabbitreborn on Oct 20, 2024 15:13:33 GMT
I’ll bet you he uses the military to murder fewer American civilians than Obama. $10,000. Want to make that bet? Fobbit is now on record as a supporter of terrorism. Lol.
|
|
|
Post by Fiddler on Oct 20, 2024 17:20:38 GMT
Maybe he'll have the Air Force bomb them .. I’ll bet you he uses the military to murder fewer American civilians than Obama. $10,000. Want to make that bet? What if they're "enemies within" ?
|
|
|
Post by RinsePrius on Oct 20, 2024 17:45:17 GMT
|
|
|
Post by rabbitreborn on Oct 20, 2024 19:09:50 GMT
We’re including non targets? “Collateral damage?” I love that. I think it’s a great idea. I was focused on directly targeting and murdering American citizens, but this is more like toward liberty, so I’m on board.
|
|
|
Post by RinsePrius on Oct 20, 2024 19:15:32 GMT
We’re including non targets? “Collateral damage?” I love that. I think it’s a great idea. I was focused on directly targeting and murdering American citizens, but this is more like toward liberty, so I’m on board. Obama killed 4 US citizens in air strikes, 3 were not intended targets. Whatever standard we choose, let's use it equally across the administrations.
|
|
|
Post by rabbitreborn on Oct 20, 2024 19:24:07 GMT
We’re including non targets? “Collateral damage?” I love that. I think it’s a great idea. I was focused on directly targeting and murdering American citizens, but this is more like toward liberty, so I’m on board. Obama killed 4 US citizens in air strikes, 3 were not intended targets. Whatever standard we choose, let's use it equally across the administrations. I know and stand by the bet, using targeted individuals. If you’re convinced, like Harris and Walz, that Trump is going to use the military against his domestic enemies, seems like a safe bet.
|
|
|
Post by RinsePrius on Oct 20, 2024 19:33:54 GMT
Obama killed 4 US citizens in air strikes, 3 were not intended targets. Whatever standard we choose, let's use it equally across the administrations. I know and stand by the bet, using targeted individuals. If you’re convinced, like Harris and Walz, that Trump is going to use the military against his domestic enemies, seems like a safe bet. I have little to no fear of it actually happening. I just find the statement dangerous. Illiberal even. We're back to the threat being a loss of faith rather than outright naked force.
|
|
|
Post by rabbitreborn on Oct 20, 2024 19:58:48 GMT
I know and stand by the bet, using targeted individuals. If you’re convinced, like Harris and Walz, that Trump is going to use the military against his domestic enemies, seems like a safe bet. I have little to no fear of it actually happening. I just find the statement dangerous. Illiberal even. We're back to the threat being a loss of faith rather than outright naked force. You’re seeing symptoms and identifying them as the cause. Loss of faith in these institutions has been degrading for decades. The institutions are failing people. Citing GDP statistics and S&P 500 numbers doesn’t fool people anymore. “Guys have more faith!” is a futile encouragement.
|
|