|
|
Post by rabbitreborn on Sept 3, 2024 21:47:38 GMT
Yep .. He does it to me too..
It's his go-to move when cornered.. and he practically lives in the corner ..
Buried under it, more likely. *dogs sniffing each other gif* OMG I DID IT AGAIN. THOR IS REKT AND PWNED. HAHAHAHAHHA DID YOU ALL SEE THAT? HE RESPONDED TO SOMEBODY IN AGREEMENT AND THEN I DID A DOGS SNIFFING EACH OTHER GIF FOR THE SIX THOUSANDTH TIME AND IT WAS PERFECT. I AM THE KING OF SLAMS. HAHAHAHAHAHAHHA THESE ARE SOFTBALLS. |
|
|
|
Post by atreyu on Sept 3, 2024 22:20:56 GMT
"Death tax" rightly identified WHY the tax was levied and makes clear how disgusting and unfair such a regressive tax is. Death triggers the tax, despite the fact that the dead person has already been taxed to death on the property and assets already. "Death tax" accurately reveals the vile greed and immorality of the federal government and its minions.
Get your head out of your fat greasy scalwag ass once in a while and you might learn something.
And partial birth abortion does happen, so stop lying to cover your abortion loving ass.
And finally, dumbass, it wasn't in the scientific journals where the shift from "global warming" to "climate change" occurred, it was the MSM that was busy gaslighting the public until GW took a 17 year break from increasing. They didn't dare let folks notice that their lies about global warming weren't aligning with the models.
Your ass is sent into orbit so often that it has a better track record than the Boeing Starliner.
Anything else, boy?
So may lies..^ So little time..
"partial-birth" is a political term used by authoritarian asshats.. There is no procedure called a partial birth abortion except in the imagination of you misogynistic douchebags and Faux News hosts.. The sometime emergency medically necessary procedure .. D&X .. accounts for 0.2% of all abortions. It has never been an elective procedure.. Never. Though you scum claim is it.
On to your next lie.. MSM Climate Change v Global Warming
Of course.. I should have remembered that all you science illiterates get your "climate science" (wink, wink) from the likes of Hannity and Jeanine Pirro .. It shows.
There was no 'break' from warming.. but idiots do still claim there was ..
Then in 2015, a team led by researchers at the U.S. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration published a jaw-dropping conclusion in the journal Science. The rise in global temperatures had not plateaued; rather, incomplete data had obscured ongoing global warming. When more Arctic temperature records were included and biases in ocean temperature data were corrected, the NOAA dataset showed the heat-up continuing. With the newly corrected data, the apparent pause in global warming vanished. A 2017 study led by Hausfather confirmed and extended these findings, as did other reports.
If stupidity could sequester CO2.. you'd solve the warming problem by yourself..
Your next lie .. the Death Tax ..
It's simply a fact.. probably why you don't know it . .. that you can't tax Death but I'm sure if there was a way to do so you right-wing fucks would give your rich overlords a huge deduction . Oh wait.. you did.
There you have it.. I kicked your ignorant ass so hard you've reached escape velocity .. Say 'Hi" to the moon.
BTW.. I'm not Black ..
Damn, that's twice in recent memory Paleocon has had his ass handed to him just about abortion.
What's it feel like Paleo?? Want some more? LOL
|
|
|
|
Post by freonbale on Sept 3, 2024 22:29:02 GMT
Ummm...manifestum? per se notum? Freon Let's put this another way. What do you interpret as "boundaryless hate speech"? Give an example.
A Nazi march in Skokie?
Ahh, ok, misunderstood your question. What was done to those Georgia election workers, exposing them to Donald's hate-driven base, destroying their lives. That's free speech gone too far. Freon |
|
|
|
Post by freonbale on Sept 3, 2024 22:30:43 GMT
It really appears that YOU are trying to play a game. I merely accused you of inaccurately interpreting my comment, so you tried to turn this around on me, but I'm not letting you. Feel free to continue playing single-player, I'll wait until you're done. Freon Nah. You deliberately (or through sheer incompetency) omitted the word “only” from my argument twice in a row, even after being reminded. Remember? I can show you how either (a) dishonest or (  incapable you were with your quotes, if you’d like. I actually don't even know what you're talking about. 'Only' what? I really have no idea what you are even accusing me of. Freon |
|
|
|
Post by HolyMoly on Sept 3, 2024 22:31:46 GMT
Death tax was a clever phrase used by right wingers for the estate tax to
make dumb goobers believe that everyone would be taxed on their death.
In reality only about 1% of estates pay that tax.
|
|
|
|
Post by rabbitreborn on Sept 4, 2024 0:45:56 GMT
Nah. You deliberately (or through sheer incompetency) omitted the word “only” from my argument twice in a row, even after being reminded. Remember? I can show you how either (a) dishonest or ( incapable you were with your quotes, if you’d like. I actually don't even know what you're talking about. 'Only' what? I really have no idea what you are even accusing me of. Freon Oh sure. Your memory is terrible. That’s right. Here’s me properly assessing your terrible argument. Ahh, the standard left-wing progressive decoder ring where everything somebody on the right says can be interpreted as racist and authoritarian. Terrible logic. Abysmal, really. Guided by partisanship and emotions only. Note the word “only”. Then you decided to omit the word “only”. Using “at all” instead. Oh, and you are not partisan at all? Hypocrite. Back to me, pointing out that I said “partisanship and emotions ONLY”, as opposed to you saying “partisan at all”. You decided to change it entirely. I admit that I am partisan, and everybody is, but I don’t let it rule my arguments. We all are. What you're omitting is the word "only". Because you're one of the most intellectually dishonest people on this forum. Then you continue to pretend I didn’t say only, because you’re incapable or dishonest or both. If we all are, then the point is moot. Freon See? This wasn’t that long ago. Shame that your reasoning is poor and your memory is terrible as well. |
|
|
|
Post by freonbale on Sept 4, 2024 0:53:14 GMT
I actually don't even know what you're talking about. 'Only' what? I really have no idea what you are even accusing me of. Freon Oh sure. Your memory is terrible. That’s right. Here’s me properly assessing your terrible argument. Ahh, the standard left-wing progressive decoder ring where everything somebody on the right says can be interpreted as racist and authoritarian. Terrible logic. Abysmal, really. Guided by partisanship and emotions only. Note the word “only”. Then you decided to omit the word “only”. Using “at all” instead. Oh, and you are not partisan at all? Hypocrite. Back to me, pointing out that I said “partisanship and emotions ONLY”, as opposed to you saying “partisan at all”. You decided to change it entirely. I admit that I am partisan, and everybody is, but I don’t let it rule my arguments. We all are. What you're omitting is the word "only". Because you're one of the most intellectually dishonest people on this forum. Then you continue to pretend I didn’t say only, because you’re incapable or dishonest or both. If we all are, then the point is moot. Freon See? This wasn’t that long ago. Shame that your reasoning is poor and your memory is terrible as well. Ok, I see the 'only' now, but I STILL don't understand why my response has you so riled up. I'm assuming in all this, that your accusation of me in particular, is that, in your opinion, I'm not ONLY partisan, but that partisanship, and I guess my emotions?, are what control my argumentation? Whereas you state you do NOT allow your partisanship to 'rule your argument's. SO much wrong with all that, I'm not sure how to dissect it cleanly. But let's start with my understanding what has your pants on fire. Did I get it, or would you like to modify. Freon |
|
|
|
Post by rabbitreborn on Sept 4, 2024 1:02:56 GMT
Oh sure. Your memory is terrible. That’s right. Here’s me properly assessing your terrible argument. Note the word “only”. Then you decided to omit the word “only”. Using “at all” instead. Back to me, pointing out that I said “partisanship and emotions ONLY”, as opposed to you saying “partisan at all”. You decided to change it entirely. I admit that I am partisan, and everybody is, but I don’t let it rule my arguments. Then you continue to pretend I didn’t say only, because you’re incapable or dishonest or both. See? This wasn’t that long ago. Shame that your reasoning is poor and your memory is terrible as well. Ok, I see the 'only' now, but I STILL don't understand why my response has you so riled up. Whoa whoa whoa. No need to get so emotional, snowflake. It’s going to be ok. |
|
|
|
Post by atreyu on Sept 4, 2024 1:07:03 GMT
I punted your ignorant ass into orbit last time and still you don't have the decency to thank me..
The notion of a "Death Tax" is idiotic .. you can't tax 'death'.. so we see why you're so attracted to the doublespeak ..
You're stuck on stupid with that partial birth bullshit.. it doesn't happen..
Despite you desperately clinging to your ignorance of science in general .. Climate Change is an older term than Global Warming..
Non-Idiots.. (people who are not you) understand that the two terms describe two different things.. "Climate Change" and "Global Warming" refer to separate aspects of climate science. It's the warming.. globally.. that's forcing climate change..
GW and CC may have been used interchangeably by the talking heads that kept you confused but were never used in that manner by anyone even remotely familiar with climate science.
The argument "they changed the name" suggests that the term 'global warming' was previously the norm, and the widespread use of the term 'climate change' is now.
However, this is simply untrue. For example, a seminal climate science work is Gilbert Plass' 1956 study 'The Carbon Dioxide Theory of Climatic Change' (which coincidentally estimated the climate sensitivity to a doubling of atmospheric carbon dioxide at 3.6°C, not far off from today's widely accepted most likely value of 3°C).
Barrett and Gast published a letter in Science in 1971 entitled simply 'Climate Change'.
The journal 'Climatic Change' was created in 1977 (and is still published today).
The IPCC was formed in 1988, and of course the 'CC' is 'climate change', not 'global warming'. There are many, many other examples of the use of the term 'climate change' many decades ago. There is nothing new whatsoever about the usage of the term.
In fact, according to Google Books, the usage of both terms in books published in the United States has increased at similar rates over the past 40 years:
And a Google Scholar search reveals that the term 'climate change' was in use before the term 'global warming', and has always been the more commonly-used term in scientific literature: So to sum up, although the terms are used interchangeably because they are causally related, 'global warming' and 'climate change' refer to different physical phenomena. The term 'climate change' has been used frequently in the scientific literature for many decades, and the usage of both terms has increased over the past 40 years. Moreover, since the planet continues to warm, there is no reason to change the terminology.
There ya'go .. And if you had any ass left.. I'd kick it too ...
To be fair, it is possible that Paleo is the result of a partial-birth abortion.  |
|
|
|
Post by atreyu on Sept 4, 2024 1:11:01 GMT
Your upcoming vote for Trump and support of GOP policies aew all the proof that is needed, Fobbit. Your claims of being a 'libertarian' are excrement, and we both know it. Oh cool. So it doesn’t really matter what I say. If somebody is voting for Trump than they are authoritarian. And if Biden, what? Freedom loving patriots? Man. What a nuanced worldview. Kudos, brother.
If they're not voting for Trump then they aren't voting for someone who self proclaims he wants to be a dictator and has policies that back up authoritarian positions.
It's really that simple.
Now if you'd rather vote for someone like that over the alternative then get to explaining how the alternative is worse. Justify your position. All the MAGA talks about is authoritarians are the worst thing ever while voting for `em. Cuba, Venezuala, blah blah blah
|
|
thor
Legend
Posts: 20,539
|
Post by thor on Sept 4, 2024 1:15:09 GMT
Oh cool. So it doesn’t really matter what I say. If somebody is voting for Trump than they are authoritarian. And if Biden, what? Freedom loving patriots? Man. What a nuanced worldview. Kudos, brother.
If they're not voting for Trump then they aren't voting for someone who self proclaims he wants to be a dictator and has policies that back up authoritarian positions.
It's really that simple.
Now if you'd rather vote for someone like that over the alternative then get to explaining how the alternative is worse. Justify you position. All the MAGA talks about is authoritarians are the worst thing ever while voting for `em. Cuba, Venezuala, blah blah blah
The Cognitive Dissonance they suffer rom must be crippling. |
|
|
|
Post by Fiddler on Sept 4, 2024 1:26:14 GMT
So may lies..^ So little time..
"partial-birth" is a political term used by authoritarian asshats.. There is no procedure called a partial birth abortion except in the imagination of you misogynistic douchebags and Faux News hosts.. The sometime emergency medically necessary procedure .. D&X .. accounts for 0.2% of all abortions. It has never been an elective procedure.. Never. Though you scum claim is it.
On to your next lie.. MSM Climate Change v Global Warming
Of course.. I should have remembered that all you science illiterates get your "climate science" (wink, wink) from the likes of Hannity and Jeanine Pirro .. It shows.
There was no 'break' from warming.. but idiots do still claim there was ..
Then in 2015, a team led by researchers at the U.S. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration published a jaw-dropping conclusion in the journal Science. The rise in global temperatures had not plateaued; rather, incomplete data had obscured ongoing global warming. When more Arctic temperature records were included and biases in ocean temperature data were corrected, the NOAA dataset showed the heat-up continuing. With the newly corrected data, the apparent pause in global warming vanished. A 2017 study led by Hausfather confirmed and extended these findings, as did other reports.
If stupidity could sequester CO2.. you'd solve the warming problem by yourself..
Your next lie .. the Death Tax ..
It's simply a fact.. probably why you don't know it . .. that you can't tax Death but I'm sure if there was a way to do so you right-wing fucks would give your rich overlords a huge deduction . Oh wait.. you did.
There you have it.. I kicked your ignorant ass so hard you've reached escape velocity .. Say 'Hi" to the moon.
BTW.. I'm not Black ..
Damn, that's twice in recent memory Paleocon has had his ass handed to him just about abortion.
I had to start handing his ass back to him .. You can only put so many on the mantle and they were starting to pile up ..
|
|
|
|
Post by atreyu on Sept 4, 2024 1:30:25 GMT
Damn, that's twice in recent memory Paleocon has had his ass handed to him just about abortion.
I had to start handing his ass back to him .. You can only put so many on the mantle and they were starting to pile up ..
Hope you had a good taxidermist.... good lord, the cost.....
|
|
|
|
Post by freonbale on Sept 4, 2024 1:38:57 GMT
Ok, I see the 'only' now, but I STILL don't understand why my response has you so riled up. Whoa whoa whoa. No need to get so emotional, snowflake. It’s going to be ok. I'm an emotional creature, rabbit. You may be pure logic, but I cannot divorce myself from feelings as completely as you have. So bear with me, while I try to understand your total logic/zero emotion perspective. Freon |
|
|
|
Post by CadesCove on Sept 4, 2024 1:41:07 GMT
I had to start handing his ass back to him .. You can only put so many on the mantle and they were starting to pile up ..
Hope you had a good taxidermist.... good lord, the cost.....
  |
|
|
|
Post by Fiddler on Sept 4, 2024 1:49:18 GMT
I had to start handing his ass back to him .. You can only put so many on the mantle and they were starting to pile up ..
Hope you had a good taxidermist.... good lord, the cost.....
Not a problem.. They come thoroughly kicked and shriveled .. By the time I get'um I've already stomped all the bullshit out of'um..
|
|
|
|
Post by Monster Man on Sept 4, 2024 1:58:27 GMT
If only your argument was one about similarities... but it wasn't. You got nothing.
Run off coward. As per your usual MO
You are the one running from your original assertion. You were the one that had to block me on here for some time because you love having the little kids at drag shows with dudes dancing like strippers for them so much... you couldn't stand my criticism. |
|
|
|
Post by atreyu on Sept 4, 2024 3:56:28 GMT
Run off coward. As per your usual MO
You are the one running from your original assertion. You were the one that had to block me on here for some time because you love having the little kids at drag shows with dudes dancing like strippers for them so much... you couldn't stand my criticism.
Man up or shut up.
|
|
|
|
Post by Monster Man on Sept 4, 2024 4:32:45 GMT
You are the one running from your original assertion. You were the one that had to block me on here for some time because you love having the little kids at drag shows with dudes dancing like strippers for them so much... you couldn't stand my criticism.
Man up or shut up.
You are the one running from your original assertion. |
|
|
|
Post by DaveJavu on Sept 4, 2024 10:23:07 GMT
So your logic is that if everyone is something, but some are not, then we are what we are? No. If you need me to dumb it down further, I can try. But you need to ask instead of making terribly foolish assumptions. Looks who's talking! Making foolish dishonest assumptions to further your agenda is all you ever do, asshole! Did you think it went unnoticed? |
|
incapable you were with your quotes, if you’d like.
