freonbale
Legend
Stop telling me I'm awesome. I already know.
Posts: 21,849
|
Post by freonbale on Jul 5, 2024 19:48:00 GMT
You really didn't understand what I said. As usual. And you definitely don't understand me. As usual. Clearly, religious studies expertise does not prepare one for critical thinking. Freon Well, except that you started your response with, "Even if you are making a valid point..." The point of the article is legit, or it's not. If you don't challenge the point of the article, you are making a mere ad hominem argument, which is weak. You claim it's "cherry picked." Refute it. Offer an alternative perspective on the issue of nitrous oxide as a "pollutant." Wrong. It's an article. It may have accurate information in it, it may not. Who wrote it? What expertise do they have? How did they verify the accuracy? Who funded them? Why did the article get written? It's that you don't ask any of these types of questions that shows me you don't critically think. To you, it's an article, and it says stuff, and that's good enough for you. Have you not learned by now that you can find any position on any topic if you use a search engine? That's not, 'research'. That's not, seeking the truth. It's lazy information gathering, and that you don't understand that, is why religious studies is a good field for you. Freon
|
|
|
Post by Mercy for All on Jul 5, 2024 19:51:09 GMT
Well, except that you started your response with, "Even if you are making a valid point..." The point of the article is legit, or it's not. If you don't challenge the point of the article, you are making a mere ad hominem argument, which is weak. You claim it's "cherry picked." Refute it. Offer an alternative perspective on the issue of nitrous oxide as a "pollutant." Wrong. It's an article. It may have accurate information in it, it may not. Who wrote it? What expertise do they have? How did they verify the accuracy? Who funded them? Why did the article get written? It's that you don't ask any of these types of questions that shows me you don't critically think. To you, it's an article, and it says stuff, and that's good enough for you. Have you not learned by now that you can find any position on any topic if you use a search engine? That's not, 'research'. That's not, seeking the truth. It's lazy information gathering, and that you don't understand that, is why religious studies is a good field for you. Freon No...not the point at all. You dismissed the article. Did you read it? Did you check the content? Did you investigate the expertise of the authors? Or did you dismiss it because petep posted it? Shame on you. I notice, however, that you didn't subject thor's article to that kind of critique. Shame on you again.
|
|
freonbale
Legend
Stop telling me I'm awesome. I already know.
Posts: 21,849
|
Post by freonbale on Jul 5, 2024 19:57:39 GMT
Wrong. It's an article. It may have accurate information in it, it may not. Who wrote it? What expertise do they have? How did they verify the accuracy? Who funded them? Why did the article get written? It's that you don't ask any of these types of questions that shows me you don't critically think. To you, it's an article, and it says stuff, and that's good enough for you. Have you not learned by now that you can find any position on any topic if you use a search engine? That's not, 'research'. That's not, seeking the truth. It's lazy information gathering, and that you don't understand that, is why religious studies is a good field for you. Freon No...not the point at all. You dismissed the article. Did you read it? Did you check the content? Did you investigate the expertise of the authors? Or did you dismiss it because petep posted it? Shame on you. I notice, however, that you didn't subject thor's article to that kind of critique. Shame on you again. Wow, how can you be this oblivious. I was not talking about the article at all. It's contents are irrelevant to my point, which was that petep was accusing Odysseus of not admitting he didn't know something, when PETEP did a web search, found this article, and was acting like he knew that information the whole time. You don't see the hypocrisy, lol. Religious studies skills. Freon
|
|
thor
Legend
Posts: 19,375
|
Post by thor on Jul 5, 2024 20:14:24 GMT
Nobody's expecting to trust people with law degrees. They're expected to trust The People.
Or is that not a thing anymore? Democracy?
Queshank
Put Que-Anon down as a guy who thinks a law degree qualifies someone to make scientific analysis. Poor, stupid Que-Anon.
|
|
|
Post by queshank on Jul 5, 2024 20:15:47 GMT
Nobody's expecting to trust people with law degrees. They're expected to trust The People.
Or is that not a thing anymore? Democracy?
Queshank
Put Que-Anon down as a guy who thinks a law degree qualifies someone to make scientific analysis. Poor, stupid Que-Anon. What is it that makes you think a government is "qualified" to make scientific analyses in the first place? Is it because a messianic politician proclaimed "the science is settled" that you got your streams so irrevocably crossed? Queshank
|
|
thor
Legend
Posts: 19,375
|
Post by thor on Jul 5, 2024 20:24:29 GMT
Leave it to the forum idiot. We just completed a multi month analysis comparing greenhouse gas pollutant effects from open field agriculture vs high tech greenhouses. In this case a 25 acre greenhouse A significant pollutant from fertilizers is nitrous oxide. 300 x the effect of co2 The environmental pollutant gas nitrous oxide is laughing gas Stay out of the adult lane
LMAO .. Like you've ever been in the adult lane..
My GOD you're a science illiterate .. We see you crash and burn EVERY TIME your ignorance overrides the instinct to keep your mouth shut ..
Whoever told you that N2O was 300 times more potent than CO2 was right.. What you're too uneducated.. too untrained to understand is that N2O only makes up 0.33 ppm of the atmosphere compared to CO2 at historic levels of 420 ppm. 1,270 times greater..
Plus.. N2O only stays the atmosphere ~120 years compared to CO2 staying in the atmosphere up to 1000 years. ..
Nice try but even with this you won't outdo your "aerosol regulations stopped global cooling" shotgun is a long range weapon fuck up ..
Even more dangerous than PP's stupidity is that FIVE other justices signed on to that 'opinion'. They are either stupid, science illiterate, or didn't read the shit they put their names on, which means they didn't actually write that 'opinion' (or read it). Wait until PP finds out that pure Oxygen is harmful in the right concentration.
|
|
thor
Legend
Posts: 19,375
|
Post by thor on Jul 5, 2024 20:27:57 GMT
Put Que-Anon down as a guy who thinks a law degree qualifies someone to make scientific analysis. Poor, stupid Que-Anon. What is it that makes you think a government is "qualified" to make scientific analyses in the first place? Is it because a messianic politician proclaimed "the science is settled" that you got your streams so irrevocably crossed? Queshank One minute, 23 seconds. You are such my bitch. You also don't know how the government hires people, you dumb shit. Poor Que-Anon, thinks being white and Trumpy will save him from his mediocrity....
|
|
thor
Legend
Posts: 19,375
|
Post by thor on Jul 5, 2024 20:30:18 GMT
NO FREE RADICALS. Science joke, you wouldn't understand. Freon No. You don’t understand. Read for once. Stop embarrassing yourself. Wait until PP finds out that Oxygen in the right concentration is harmful....
|
|
|
Post by queshank on Jul 5, 2024 20:30:40 GMT
What is it that makes you think a government is "qualified" to make scientific analyses in the first place? Is it because a messianic politician proclaimed "the science is settled" that you got your streams so irrevocably crossed? Queshank One minute, 23 seconds. You are such my bitch. You also don't know how the government hires people, you dumb shit. Poor Que-Anon, thinks being white and Trumpy will save him from his mediocrity....
This may be your dumbest post. But it's truly a tough call.
Stupid comment about responses. Stupid comment about irrelevant issues. Stupid ad hominen. Checks a lot of the boxes you normally aspire to.
Queshank
|
|
thor
Legend
Posts: 19,375
|
Post by thor on Jul 5, 2024 20:31:58 GMT
Well, except that you started your response with, "Even if you are making a valid point..." The point of the article is legit, or it's not. If you don't challenge the point of the article, you are making a mere ad hominem argument, which is weak. You claim it's "cherry picked." Refute it. Offer an alternative perspective on the issue of nitrous oxide as a "pollutant." Wrong. It's an article. It may have accurate information in it, it may not. Who wrote it? What expertise do they have? How did they verify the accuracy? Who funded them? Why did the article get written? It's that you don't ask any of these types of questions that shows me you don't critically think. To you, it's an article, and it says stuff, and that's good enough for you. Have you not learned by now that you can find any position on any topic if you use a search engine? That's not, 'research'. That's not, seeking the truth. It's lazy information gathering, and that you don't understand that, is why religious studies is a good field for you. Freon You can also find this phenomena in the Bible quite often, which explains a great deal about how MFA thinks and argues.
|
|
freonbale
Legend
Stop telling me I'm awesome. I already know.
Posts: 21,849
|
Post by freonbale on Jul 5, 2024 20:58:31 GMT
Wrong. It's an article. It may have accurate information in it, it may not. Who wrote it? What expertise do they have? How did they verify the accuracy? Who funded them? Why did the article get written? It's that you don't ask any of these types of questions that shows me you don't critically think. To you, it's an article, and it says stuff, and that's good enough for you. Have you not learned by now that you can find any position on any topic if you use a search engine? That's not, 'research'. That's not, seeking the truth. It's lazy information gathering, and that you don't understand that, is why religious studies is a good field for you. Freon You can also find this phenomena in the Bible quite often, which explains a great deal about how MFA thinks and argues. I think their worst sin is in assuming that without training in research, that they magically have the ability to perform it at the same level as those who are trained to do it. They think their 'common sense' equips them to critically think. In my experience, common sense is near useless when it comes to understanding complex systems. Freon
|
|
|
Post by Mercy for All on Jul 5, 2024 21:35:27 GMT
No...not the point at all. You dismissed the article. Did you read it? Did you check the content? Did you investigate the expertise of the authors? Or did you dismiss it because petep posted it? Shame on you. I notice, however, that you didn't subject thor's article to that kind of critique. Shame on you again. Wow, how can you be this oblivious. I was not talking about the article at all. It's contents are irrelevant to my point, which was that petep was accusing Odysseus of not admitting he didn't know something, when PETEP did a web search, found this article, and was acting like he knew that information the whole time. You don't see the hypocrisy, lol. Religious studies skills. Freon Oh...you...uh..."weren't talking about the article"? When you said this: "Wrong. It's an article. It may have accurate information in it, it may not. Who wrote it? What expertise do they have? How did they verify the accuracy? Who funded them? Why did the article get written?" ...you weren't talking about the article? When you said this: "...this is clearly a cherry-picked article." ...you weren't talking about the article? Your point was to...defend Odysseus? Are you tacitly suggesting that thor "knows enough about science" that the article he posted was well-researched and "not cherry picked"? What colour are your eyes?
|
|
|
Post by Mercy for All on Jul 5, 2024 21:36:28 GMT
LMAO .. Like you've ever been in the adult lane..
My GOD you're a science illiterate .. We see you crash and burn EVERY TIME your ignorance overrides the instinct to keep your mouth shut ..
Whoever told you that N2O was 300 times more potent than CO2 was right.. What you're too uneducated.. too untrained to understand is that N2O only makes up 0.33 ppm of the atmosphere compared to CO2 at historic levels of 420 ppm. 1,270 times greater..
Plus.. N2O only stays the atmosphere ~120 years compared to CO2 staying in the atmosphere up to 1000 years. ..
Nice try but even with this you won't outdo your "aerosol regulations stopped global cooling" shotgun is a long range weapon fuck up ..
Even more dangerous than PP's stupidity is that FIVE other justices signed on to that 'opinion'. They are either stupid, science illiterate, or didn't read the shit they put their names on, which means they didn't actually write that 'opinion' (or read it). Wait until PP finds out that pure Oxygen is harmful in the right concentration. Was "concentration" the issue in the OP?
|
|
|
Post by Mercy for All on Jul 5, 2024 21:36:45 GMT
Wrong. It's an article. It may have accurate information in it, it may not. Who wrote it? What expertise do they have? How did they verify the accuracy? Who funded them? Why did the article get written? It's that you don't ask any of these types of questions that shows me you don't critically think. To you, it's an article, and it says stuff, and that's good enough for you. Have you not learned by now that you can find any position on any topic if you use a search engine? That's not, 'research'. That's not, seeking the truth. It's lazy information gathering, and that you don't understand that, is why religious studies is a good field for you. Freon You can also find this phenomena in the Bible quite often, which explains a great deal about how MFA thinks and argues. Please don't fall into freon's trap.
|
|
|
Post by Mercy for All on Jul 5, 2024 21:38:16 GMT
You can also find this phenomena in the Bible quite often, which explains a great deal about how MFA thinks and argues. I think their worst sin is in assuming that without training in research, that they magically have the ability to perform it at the same level as those who are trained to do it. They think their 'common sense' equips them to critically think. In my experience, common sense is near useless when it comes to understanding complex systems. Freon Unfortunately, with your long and consistent history of misdirection, misrepresentation, and straight up lying, you are hardly a paragon of "critical thinking." Why did you even get involved in this thread? What does it have to do with your monitoring of the people you claim to be terrified of?
|
|
thor
Legend
Posts: 19,375
|
Post by thor on Jul 5, 2024 22:10:52 GMT
One minute, 23 seconds. You are such my bitch. You also don't know how the government hires people, you dumb shit. Poor Que-Anon, thinks being white and Trumpy will save him from his mediocrity....
This may be your dumbest post. But it's truly a tough call.
Stupid comment about responses. Stupid comment about irrelevant issues. Stupid ad hominen. Checks a lot of the boxes you normally aspire to.
Queshank
Forty-three seconds. You are such my bitch.
|
|
thor
Legend
Posts: 19,375
|
Post by thor on Jul 5, 2024 22:12:49 GMT
Even more dangerous than PP's stupidity is that FIVE other justices signed on to that 'opinion'. They are either stupid, science illiterate, or didn't read the shit they put their names on, which means they didn't actually write that 'opinion' (or read it). Wait until PP finds out that pure Oxygen is harmful in the right concentration. Was "concentration" the issue in the OP? You do realize that pure Oxygen is 100% concentration...right? In your religious zeal to defend your fellow traveler, you blew it. Science better please. 3...2...1... Parse, parse, parse......wuddabout, wuddabout, wuddabout....
|
|
freonbale
Legend
Stop telling me I'm awesome. I already know.
Posts: 21,849
|
Post by freonbale on Jul 5, 2024 22:25:40 GMT
Wow, how can you be this oblivious. I was not talking about the article at all. It's contents are irrelevant to my point, which was that petep was accusing Odysseus of not admitting he didn't know something, when PETEP did a web search, found this article, and was acting like he knew that information the whole time. You don't see the hypocrisy, lol. Religious studies skills. Freon Oh...you...uh..."weren't talking about the article"? When you said this: "Wrong. It's an article. It may have accurate information in it, it may not. Who wrote it? What expertise do they have? How did they verify the accuracy? Who funded them? Why did the article get written?" ...you weren't talking about the article? When you said this: "...this is clearly a cherry-picked article." ...you weren't talking about the article? Your point was to...defend Odysseus? Are you tacitly suggesting that thor "knows enough about science" that the article he posted was well-researched and "not cherry picked"? What colour are your eyes? Wow, now you are taking my response to YOU, and construing as my original response that you were asking about? You are CRAZY, Mercy. There's zero logic going on in that head of yours, lol. Freon
|
|
freonbale
Legend
Stop telling me I'm awesome. I already know.
Posts: 21,849
|
Post by freonbale on Jul 5, 2024 22:28:03 GMT
I think their worst sin is in assuming that without training in research, that they magically have the ability to perform it at the same level as those who are trained to do it. They think their 'common sense' equips them to critically think. In my experience, common sense is near useless when it comes to understanding complex systems. Freon Unfortunately, with your long and consistent history of misdirection, misrepresentation, and straight up lying, you are hardly a paragon of "critical thinking." Why did you even get involved in this thread? What does it have to do with your monitoring of the people you claim to be terrified of? So even after I told you explicitly, you still do not get it? I'm not sure how to communicate with minds like yours, Mercy. I only know how to speak logically and rationally. Communicating with someone who is neither, baffles me. But I'll keep trying, maybe I'll be able to dumb myself down enough to accommodate you. Freon
|
|
|
Post by Mercy for All on Jul 5, 2024 22:33:09 GMT
Oh...you...uh..."weren't talking about the article"? When you said this: "Wrong. It's an article. It may have accurate information in it, it may not. Who wrote it? What expertise do they have? How did they verify the accuracy? Who funded them? Why did the article get written?" ...you weren't talking about the article? When you said this: "...this is clearly a cherry-picked article." ...you weren't talking about the article? Your point was to...defend Odysseus? Are you tacitly suggesting that thor "knows enough about science" that the article he posted was well-researched and "not cherry picked"? What colour are your eyes? Wow, now you are taking my response to YOU, and construing as my original response that you were asking about? You are CRAZY, Mercy. There's zero logic going on in that head of yours, lol. Freon You might need to be clearer about what you're talking about. Because I was talking about your response to petep. Now you say that you're not talking about that to me. But that's what I'm talking about to you.
|
|