thor
Legend
Posts: 19,285
|
Post by thor on Jul 5, 2024 14:57:23 GMT
|
|
petep
Legend
Posts: 24,984
|
Post by petep on Jul 5, 2024 15:23:08 GMT
Leave it to the forum idiot. We just completed a multi month analysis comparing greenhouse gas pollutant effects from open field agriculture vs high tech greenhouses. In this case a 25 acre greenhouse A significant pollutant from fertilizers is nitrous oxide. 300 x the effect of co2 The environmental pollutant gas nitrous oxide is laughing gas Stay out of the adult lane |
|
freonbale
Legend
Stop telling me I'm awesome. I already know.
Posts: 21,683
|
Post by freonbale on Jul 5, 2024 15:45:24 GMT
Leave it to the forum idiot. We just completed a multi month analysis comparing greenhouse gas pollutant effects from open field agriculture vs high tech greenhouses. In this case a 25 acre greenhouse A significant pollutant from fertilizers is nitrous oxide. 300 x the effect of co2 The environmental pollutant gas nitrous oxide is laughing gas Stay out of the adult lane NO FREE RADICALS. Science joke, you wouldn't understand. Freon |
|
petep
Legend
Posts: 24,984
|
Post by petep on Jul 5, 2024 15:46:50 GMT
|
|
petep
Legend
Posts: 24,984
|
Post by petep on Jul 5, 2024 15:47:39 GMT
Leave it to the forum idiot. We just completed a multi month analysis comparing greenhouse gas pollutant effects from open field agriculture vs high tech greenhouses. In this case a 25 acre greenhouse A significant pollutant from fertilizers is nitrous oxide. 300 x the effect of co2 The environmental pollutant gas nitrous oxide is laughing gas Stay out of the adult lane NO FREE RADICALS. Science joke, you wouldn't understand. Freon No. You don’t understand. Read for once. Stop embarrassing yourself. |
|
freonbale
Legend
Stop telling me I'm awesome. I already know.
Posts: 21,683
|
Post by freonbale on Jul 5, 2024 15:56:06 GMT
NO FREE RADICALS. Science joke, you wouldn't understand. Freon No. You don’t understand. Read for once. Stop embarrassing yourself. Ok, Hoss. Freon |
|
Odysseus
Legend
Trump=>Chump
Posts: 40,749
|
Post by Odysseus on Jul 5, 2024 16:32:55 GMT
Now, I have a science degree from a major university.
I don't see how Thor got anything wrong.
|
|
thor
Legend
Posts: 19,285
|
Post by thor on Jul 5, 2024 16:39:59 GMT
 Leave it to the guy who traded his country for a red hat to scour the Internet for something that makes him look even worse.  |
|
petep
Legend
Posts: 24,984
|
Post by petep on Jul 5, 2024 16:46:00 GMT
Now, I have a science degree from a major university.
I don't see how Thor got anything wrong.
This is exactly what he was mocking: “Confuses Laughing Gas With Air Pollutant” So I corrected him. Nitrous oxide is laughing gas. And is considered by the epa and dem to be a pollutant to be measured. Now the United States right to farm act allows the co2 and nitrous oxide emissions in agricultural use of fertilizers. But in order to be eligible for certain incentives and rebates when installing generators for large scale greenhouses one must show all calculations of greenhouse related gasses and pollutants such as co2 and nitrous oxide and the net reduction from the move to more clean sustainable forms of energy in agriculture use. Or take it up with climate scientists in just about every country naei.beis.gov.uk/overview/pollutants?pollutant_id=5#:~:text=Pollutant%20Information%3A%20Nitrous%20Oxide&text=Nitrous%20oxide%20(N2O,of%201%20for%20carbon%20dioxide. What is it about the left - whether this, covid vaccines, or shotguns - that they simply cannot say you know, I was not aware of that fact. Thanks for sharing. Instead they mock others on subjects they know nothing about. Then when corrected by people with real world experience who provide multiple sources they double down on stupid, or pivot to some new argument. |
|
Odysseus
Legend
Trump=>Chump
Posts: 40,749
|
Post by Odysseus on Jul 5, 2024 16:48:43 GMT
Again, PP makes no sense.
|
|
petep
Legend
Posts: 24,984
|
Post by petep on Jul 5, 2024 16:52:16 GMT
Again, PP makes no sense. It makes perfect sense. |
|
thor
Legend
Posts: 19,285
|
Post by thor on Jul 5, 2024 16:55:05 GMT
Again, PP makes no sense. It makes perfect sense. If you are an imbecile.... |
|
petep
Legend
Posts: 24,984
|
Post by petep on Jul 5, 2024 16:57:25 GMT
|
|
Fiddler
Legend
Wasted again ..
Posts: 14,527
|
Post by Fiddler on Jul 5, 2024 18:10:22 GMT
Leave it to the forum idiot. We just completed a multi month analysis comparing greenhouse gas pollutant effects from open field agriculture vs high tech greenhouses. In this case a 25 acre greenhouse A significant pollutant from fertilizers is nitrous oxide. 300 x the effect of co2 The environmental pollutant gas nitrous oxide is laughing gas Stay out of the adult lane
LMAO .. Like you've ever been in the adult lane..
My GOD you're a science illiterate .. We see you crash and burn EVERY TIME your ignorance overrides the instinct to keep your mouth shut ..
Whoever told you that N2O was 300 times more potent than CO2 was right.. What you're too uneducated.. too untrained to understand is that N2O only makes up 0.33 ppm of the atmosphere compared to CO2 at historic levels of 420 ppm. 1,270 times greater..
Plus.. N2O only stays the atmosphere ~120 years compared to CO2 staying in the atmosphere up to 1000 years. ..
Nice try but even with this you won't outdo your "aerosol regulations stopped global cooling" shotgun is a long range weapon fuck up ..
|
|
|
|
Post by queshank on Jul 5, 2024 18:18:52 GMT
Nobody's expecting to trust people with law degrees.
They're expected to trust The People.
Or is that not a thing anymore? Democracy?
Queshank
|
|
freonbale
Legend
Stop telling me I'm awesome. I already know.
Posts: 21,683
|
Post by freonbale on Jul 5, 2024 18:22:42 GMT
Now, I have a science degree from a major university.
I don't see how Thor got anything wrong.
This is exactly what he was mocking: “Confuses Laughing Gas With Air Pollutant” So I corrected him. Nitrous oxide is laughing gas. And is considered by the epa and dem to be a pollutant to be measured. Now the United States right to farm act allows the co2 and nitrous oxide emissions in agricultural use of fertilizers. But in order to be eligible for certain incentives and rebates when installing generators for large scale greenhouses one must show all calculations of greenhouse related gasses and pollutants such as co2 and nitrous oxide and the net reduction from the move to more clean sustainable forms of energy in agriculture use. Or take it up with climate scientists in just about every country naei.beis.gov.uk/overview/pollutants?pollutant_id=5#:~:text=Pollutant%20Information%3A%20Nitrous%20Oxide&text=Nitrous%20oxide%20(N2O,of%201%20for%20carbon%20dioxide. What is it about the left - whether this, covid vaccines, or shotguns - that they simply cannot say you know, I was not aware of that fact. Thanks for sharing. Instead they mock others on subjects they know nothing about. Then when corrected by people with real world experience who provide multiple sources they double down on stupid, or pivot to some new argument. Even if you are making a valid point, and I'm not saying you are, this is clearly a cherry-picked article. YOU didn't know this. And yet you complain the other side doesn't acknowledge that as well. You are not a scientist. You are nearly totally ignorant about how the physical world operates, yet you believe you can do a web search, find an article, and now you have a valid platform to defend your views, or contradict another's. Hypocrite. Freon |
|
|
|
Post by Mercy for All on Jul 5, 2024 19:11:24 GMT
Again, PP makes no sense. If something doesn't make sense to you, that doesn't make it wrong or illogical. |
|
|
|
Post by Mercy for All on Jul 5, 2024 19:12:55 GMT
This is exactly what he was mocking: “Confuses Laughing Gas With Air Pollutant” So I corrected him. Nitrous oxide is laughing gas. And is considered by the epa and dem to be a pollutant to be measured. Now the United States right to farm act allows the co2 and nitrous oxide emissions in agricultural use of fertilizers. But in order to be eligible for certain incentives and rebates when installing generators for large scale greenhouses one must show all calculations of greenhouse related gasses and pollutants such as co2 and nitrous oxide and the net reduction from the move to more clean sustainable forms of energy in agriculture use. Or take it up with climate scientists in just about every country naei.beis.gov.uk/overview/pollutants?pollutant_id=5#:~:text=Pollutant%20Information%3A%20Nitrous%20Oxide&text=Nitrous%20oxide%20(N2O,of%201%20for%20carbon%20dioxide. What is it about the left - whether this, covid vaccines, or shotguns - that they simply cannot say you know, I was not aware of that fact. Thanks for sharing. Instead they mock others on subjects they know nothing about. Then when corrected by people with real world experience who provide multiple sources they double down on stupid, or pivot to some new argument. Even if you are making a valid point, and I'm not saying you are, this is clearly a cherry-picked article. YOU didn't know this. And yet you complain the other side doesn't acknowledge that as well. You are not a scientist. You are nearly totally ignorant about how the physical world operates, yet you believe you can do a web search, find an article, and now you have a valid platform to defend your views, or contradict another's. Hypocrite. Freon Wait, what? Even if petep is making a valid point, it "doesn't count" because of how he found the information? Is that how science works, coolant? |
|
freonbale
Legend
Stop telling me I'm awesome. I already know.
Posts: 21,683
|
Post by freonbale on Jul 5, 2024 19:24:44 GMT
Even if you are making a valid point, and I'm not saying you are, this is clearly a cherry-picked article. YOU didn't know this. And yet you complain the other side doesn't acknowledge that as well. You are not a scientist. You are nearly totally ignorant about how the physical world operates, yet you believe you can do a web search, find an article, and now you have a valid platform to defend your views, or contradict another's. Hypocrite. Freon Wait, what? Even if petep is making a valid point, it "doesn't count" because of how he found the information? Is that how science works, coolant? You really didn't understand what I said. As usual. And you definitely don't understand me. As usual. Clearly, religious studies expertise does not prepare one for critical thinking. Freon |
|
|
|
Post by Mercy for All on Jul 5, 2024 19:27:36 GMT
Wait, what? Even if petep is making a valid point, it "doesn't count" because of how he found the information? Is that how science works, coolant? You really didn't understand what I said. As usual. And you definitely don't understand me. As usual. Clearly, religious studies expertise does not prepare one for critical thinking. Freon Well, except that you started your response with, "Even if you are making a valid point..." The point of the article is legit, or it's not. If you don't challenge the point of the article, you are making a mere ad hominem argument, which is weak. You claim it's "cherry picked." Refute it. Offer an alternative perspective on the issue of nitrous oxide as a "pollutant." |
|
