|
|
Post by slefty on Jul 20, 2024 6:47:05 GMT
No Obama cannot be VP... but Michelle as president??? That would beat trump.
|
|
|
|
Post by MojoJojo on Jul 20, 2024 11:59:22 GMT
No Obama cannot be VP... but Michelle as president??? That would beat trump. Ugh! Fuck dynasties. JFC, 340+ million people and we want royal families to represent us? This isn't GOT. |
|
thor
Legend
Posts: 20,410
|
Post by thor on Jul 20, 2024 13:26:08 GMT
No Obama cannot be VP... but Michelle as president??? That would beat trump. Ugh! Fuck dynasties. JFC, 340+ million people and we want royal families to represent us? This isn't GOT. Reminds me of the dumbass memes I would see on my social media feed showing Don Jr, Eric, Ivanka, Tiffany and Barron in consecutive administrations to 'Own the Libs'. I would say stuff like 'Didn't we fight a war against that kind of thing a couple hundred years ago?', or 'Thanks for letting us know what color your coat would have been at Lexington and Concord.'. Great fun! |
|
|
|
Post by queshank on Jul 20, 2024 14:34:49 GMT
Ugh! Fuck dynasties. JFC, 340+ million people and we want royal families to represent us? This isn't GOT. Reminds me of the dumbass memes I would see on my social media feed showing Don Jr, Eric, Ivanka, Tiffany and Barron in consecutive administrations to 'Own the Libs'. I would say stuff like 'Didn't we fight a war against that kind of thing a couple hundred years ago?', or 'Thanks for letting us know what color your coat would have been at Lexington and Concord.'. Great fun!
And arguments against Bush the Younger.
And arguments against Clinton the Female.
Hell for a long time there protesting the idea of political dynasties was mainstream.
You're still struggling with understanding the difference between "owning the libs" and "trolling the libs" aren't you?
Queshank
|
|
thor
Legend
Posts: 20,410
|
Post by thor on Jul 20, 2024 20:03:34 GMT
Reminds me of the dumbass memes I would see on my social media feed showing Don Jr, Eric, Ivanka, Tiffany and Barron in consecutive administrations to 'Own the Libs'. I would say stuff like 'Didn't we fight a war against that kind of thing a couple hundred years ago?', or 'Thanks for letting us know what color your coat would have been at Lexington and Concord.'. Great fun!
And arguments against Bush the Younger.
And arguments against Clinton the Female.
Hell for a long time there protesting the idea of political dynasties was mainstream.
You're still struggling with understanding the difference between "owning the libs" and "trolling the libs" aren't you?
Queshank
You fucked up your 'analysis'...... Again. |
|
|
|
Post by HolyMoly on Jul 20, 2024 21:12:28 GMT
The question of whether Obama could run as VP is ambiguous. I just brought it
up as a weird possibility, not as something that will happen.
|
|
|
|
Post by queshank on Jul 20, 2024 21:19:00 GMT
And arguments against Bush the Younger.
And arguments against Clinton the Female.
Hell for a long time there protesting the idea of political dynasties was mainstream.
You're still struggling with understanding the difference between "owning the libs" and "trolling the libs" aren't you?
Queshank
You fucked up your 'analysis'...... Again. Sure bro. Sure.
Queshank
|
|
|
|
Post by queshank on Jul 21, 2024 19:50:41 GMT
It'll be interesting seeing which of the potential candidates steps up and which run for cover.
Queshank
|
|
|
|
Post by VYPR on Sept 15, 2024 5:04:17 GMT
Democrats are making a Trump win inevitable by turning on the only guy who can carry them through. They have only Kamala Harris. A candidate that ran an abysmal primary campaign and dropped out quickly with very little support. She might just be the least charismatic presidential candidate in modern history. They gonna replace her with a white man the way the other board leftists want done? And win?? If Democrats stop eating their own and focus on the 2024 campaign they can do the same thing they did in 2020. Weekend at Bernies that shit and win the election .. THEN Biden steps down and Kamala replaces him.
Queshank
This thread hasn't aged well. LOL. |
|
thor
Legend
Posts: 20,410
|
Post by thor on Sept 15, 2024 11:53:19 GMT
Democrats are making a Trump win inevitable by turning on the only guy who can carry them through. They have only Kamala Harris. A candidate that ran an abysmal primary campaign and dropped out quickly with very little support. She might just be the least charismatic presidential candidate in modern history. They gonna replace her with a white man the way the other board leftists want done? And win?? If Democrats stop eating their own and focus on the 2024 campaign they can do the same thing they did in 2020. Weekend at Bernies that shit and win the election .. THEN Biden steps down and Kamala replaces him.
Queshank
This thread hasn't aged well. LOL. Wait.......Que-Anon fucked up his 'analysis'? Again? |
|
|
|
Post by queshank on Sept 15, 2024 23:02:13 GMT
Democrats are making a Trump win inevitable by turning on the only guy who can carry them through. They have only Kamala Harris. A candidate that ran an abysmal primary campaign and dropped out quickly with very little support. She might just be the least charismatic presidential candidate in modern history. They gonna replace her with a white man the way the other board leftists want done? And win?? If Democrats stop eating their own and focus on the 2024 campaign they can do the same thing they did in 2020. Weekend at Bernies that shit and win the election .. THEN Biden steps down and Kamala replaces him.
Queshank
This thread hasn't aged well. LOL.
Why?
They made a mistake rolling Kamala out so early. I argued in multiple threads they should keep Biden around until just before and ride that bump thru the election.
Now Kamala has no post debate bump (I hear from Greg that's bad news) and no post debate bump. Because all the energy was expended out the gate.
Read more than just the Anderson Cooper takes on how close this election is Vypr. Enlighten yourself.
Or stick to the cesspool that is reddit and arstechnica. Stay deluded my friend.
Queshank
|
|
|
|
Post by queshank on Sept 15, 2024 23:03:07 GMT
This thread hasn't aged well. LOL. Wait.......Que-Anon fucked up his 'analysis'? Again?
Oh hell no.
I said
If Democrats stop eating their own and focus on the 2024 campaign they can do the same thing they did in 2020.
That was a big if.
But they couldn't.
Queshank
|
|
|
|
Post by queshank on Sept 16, 2024 15:13:03 GMT
I've been listening to NBC News playing in the background while in the house taking a break from playing with puppies in the back yard. (Exhausting work I tells ya!)
They keep talking about those ambitious governors lining up to step into Biden's shoes.
If there's a politician eager for Biden to drop out so they can slip into that seat ... they're morons. Legitimately. Especially the younger ones that can wait til 2028.
First, you can convince me any of the politicians in the running aren't aware the ThReAt To DeMoCrAcY is anything but a campaign slogan. Second ... why the fuck would anybody want to go up against Trump in this environment? The only "politician" that polls well against Trump and beats him is Michelle Obama ffs. She's not even a politician and has gone on record repeatedly as having no interest. I don't think she even had interest in her husband being president. Why tf would she want the 4 years of angst the presidency would bring?
Let Biden take the L. Spend 4 more years fundraising and riling up the base fearmongering about racism. Profit in 2028.
Because a candidate starting up now ... is so far behind the curve they're not gonna be in any better position than Biden. Who hasn't really experienced any polling fallout from the debates.
I still don't see Biden stepping down. When the hubbub dies down it'll be celebrated as "Biden always pulls it out when it matters!" The news is saying they "don't see how" Biden turns this around. lol. Really? Really? Don't see how? My ass.
Queshank
Truthfully tho Vypr has a point.
Even I underestimated just how far the oligarchy would go to subvert democracy.
Queshank
|
|
|
|
Post by queshank on Nov 10, 2024 18:00:26 GMT
If there's a politician eager for Biden to drop out so they can slip into that seat ... they're morons. Legitimately. Especially the younger ones that can wait til 2028. Second ... why the fuck would anybody want to go up against Trump in this environment? The only "politician" that polls well against Trump and beats him is Michelle Obama ffs. She's not even a politician and has gone on record repeatedly as having no interest. I don't think she even had interest in her husband being president. Why tf would she want the 4 years of angst the presidency would bring? Let Biden take the L. Spend 4 more years fundraising and riling up the base fearmongering about racism. Profit in 2028. Because a candidate starting up now ... is so far behind the curve they're not gonna be in any better position than Biden. Who hasn't really experienced any polling fallout from the debates.
Queshank
This thread aged remarkably well.
Queshank
|
|
petep
Legend
Posts: 25,957
|
Post by petep on Nov 11, 2024 14:18:02 GMT
Democrats are making a Trump win inevitable by turning on the only guy who can carry them through. They have only Kamala Harris. A candidate that ran an abysmal primary campaign and dropped out quickly with very little support. She might just be the least charismatic presidential candidate in modern history. They gonna replace her with a white man the way the other board leftists want done? And win?? If Democrats stop eating their own and focus on the 2024 campaign they can do the same thing they did in 2020. Weekend at Bernies that shit and win the election .. THEN Biden steps down and Kamala replaces him.
Queshank
This thread hasn't aged well. LOL. For you it has not. |
|
