sokpupet
Legend
Go Dark Brandon!
Posts: 5,222
|
Post by sokpupet on Apr 30, 2024 0:47:19 GMT
Yes and when the fetus is viable, it is removed from the womb and that is when it is born. No one aborts viable babies. Why do you keep saying the same stupid shit Yes they do. www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9321603/Are they bad for doing so? Is it wrong to terminate a developing human fetus after 24 months? Should it be illegal? Then don’t you get anyone pregnant. Unless you are an OB/GYN you have no business with it.
|
|
|
Post by rabbitreborn on Apr 30, 2024 0:52:19 GMT
Then don’t you get anyone pregnant. Unless you are an OB/GYN you have no business with it. Hahahahaha. It’s a deal. The only time I’ve gotten somebody pregnant is when we both wanted her to get pregnant. What are you talking about?
|
|
Odysseus
Legend
Trump=Chump
Posts: 39,224
|
Post by Odysseus on Apr 30, 2024 1:25:38 GMT
Then don’t you get anyone pregnant. Unless you are an OB/GYN you have no business with it.
More importantly, most human fetuses only last 9 months. 24 months? That would be about 2.67 years... not gonna work... the baby would probaby have expired after about 10 months, if not sooner. Along with the mother.
|
|
|
Post by thecitizen on Apr 30, 2024 1:44:32 GMT
Yes and when the fetus is viable, it is removed from the womb and that is when it is born. No one aborts viable babies. Why do you keep saying the same stupid shit Yes they do. www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9321603/Are they bad for doing so? Is it wrong to terminate a developing human fetus after 24 months? Should it be illegal? Do you believe that all third trimester pregnancies are viable? See this is exactly why idiots like you should not be making laws about abortion
|
|
|
Post by slefty on Apr 30, 2024 3:36:51 GMT
So still pro-abortion. Let me know when you figure out you don't get to decide for another. Not true, but your kind has never been interested in the truth, have you? This is like you pointing out my pimple when you're covered in pus oozing boils. Every abortion, including those where a mother's life is in danger, kills a human being. Keeping that to the tiniest minimum is not pro-abortion.
Aren't you deciding for another when that voiceless child is slaughtered while you're celebrating and cheerleading for the woman who just killed her own child?
Liberals really don't have any integrity at all, do they?
No, you're still a pro-abortionist, kill a baby to save the mother. Why? I have 2 kids and the thought that we could've aborted them sickens me. I do not celebrate and cheer lead abortions. I will not tell a 10 year old she must have the baby or woman with 5 kids whose birth control failed she must have another. The pill plus a condom is ONLY 99 percent effective. AGAIN, you are FOR abortion, you just have different position on WHEN it is OK. If you ever get a female pregnant then you and her can decide what is best. No one else should make the decision for you.
|
|
|
Post by HolyMoly on Apr 30, 2024 4:16:12 GMT
I wouldn't even vote for her for local dog killer.
|
|
|
Post by thecitizen on Apr 30, 2024 11:30:35 GMT
Then don’t you get anyone pregnant. Unless you are an OB/GYN you have no business with it. Hahahahaha. It’s a deal. The only time I’ve gotten somebody pregnant is when we both wanted her to get pregnant. What are you talking about? Sometimes it happens when you don’t want her to get pregnant. Shit happens
|
|
|
Post by rabbitreborn on Apr 30, 2024 12:48:05 GMT
Do you believe that all third trimester pregnancies are viable? See this is exactly why idiots like you should not be making laws about abortion I don’t believe that. When you ask a question, wait for the person to respond. But I linked to an article that clearly stated that not every late term abortion is due to the baby not being viable. Are you going to pretend it’s not in there again? Pretend that you see every other paragraph except for those? Like you did before?
|
|
Paleocon
Legend
We spent 50 Years fighting the USSR just to become a gay, retarded version of It.
Posts: 6,286
|
Post by Paleocon on Apr 30, 2024 13:24:40 GMT
Not true, but your kind has never been interested in the truth, have you? This is like you pointing out my pimple when you're covered in pus oozing boils. Every abortion, including those where a mother's life is in danger, kills a human being. Keeping that to the tiniest minimum is not pro-abortion.
Aren't you deciding for another when that voiceless child is slaughtered while you're celebrating and cheerleading for the woman who just killed her own child?
Liberals really don't have any integrity at all, do they?
No, you're still a pro-abortionist, kill a baby to save the mother. Why? I have 2 kids and the thought that we could've aborted them sickens me. I do not celebrate and cheer lead abortions. I will not tell a 10 year old she must have the baby or woman with 5 kids whose birth control failed she must have another. The pill plus a condom is ONLY 99 percent effective. AGAIN, you are FOR abortion, you just have different position on WHEN it is OK. If you ever get a female pregnant then you and her can decide what is best. No one else should make the decision for you. Nope, still not a pro-abortionist like you are no matter how many times you spew that falsehood. I don't want there to ever be another abortion, but in the situation where we have to throw away one life to preserve another, a choice must be made. That's reality, not being FOR abortion.
If you support ANY abortion other than one saving a life, you are celebrating and cheer leading abortions. You look ridiculous being so absolute in my case while denying your absolute support of all abortions.
"No one else should make the decision for you" - says slefty. Today, we tell parents not to murder their children after birth. I guess, under slefty's "logic", we should just let the parents decide if it's best to kill their children, right?
|
|
sokpupet
Legend
Go Dark Brandon!
Posts: 5,222
|
Post by sokpupet on Apr 30, 2024 13:32:19 GMT
Not true, but your kind has never been interested in the truth, have you? This is like you pointing out my pimple when you're covered in pus oozing boils. Every abortion, including those where a mother's life is in danger, kills a human being. Keeping that to the tiniest minimum is not pro-abortion.
Aren't you deciding for another when that voiceless child is slaughtered while you're celebrating and cheerleading for the woman who just killed her own child?
Liberals really don't have any integrity at all, do they?
No, you're still a pro-abortionist, kill a baby to save the mother. Why? I have 2 kids and the thought that we could've aborted them sickens me. I do not celebrate and cheer lead abortions. I will not tell a 10 year old she must have the baby or woman with 5 kids whose birth control failed she must have another. The pill plus a condom is ONLY 99 percent effective. AGAIN, you are FOR abortion, you just have different position on WHEN it is OK. If you ever get a female pregnant then you and her can decide what is best. No one else should make the decision for you. What an excellent post to share this. (This is not directed at you; but meant to dovetail your post): joycearthur.com/abortion/the-only-moral-abortion-is-my-abortion/
|
|
sokpupet
Legend
Go Dark Brandon!
Posts: 5,222
|
Post by sokpupet on Apr 30, 2024 13:33:48 GMT
Posted in it’s own space for emphasis: joycearthur.com/abortion/the-only-moral-abortion-is-my-abortion/Snipped; “… “I have done several abortions on women who have regularly picketed my clinics, including a 16 year old schoolgirl who came back to picket the day after her abortion, about three years ago. During her whole stay at the clinic, we felt that she was not quite right, but there were no real warning bells. She insisted that the abortion was her idea and assured us that all was OK. She went through the procedure very smoothly and was discharged with no problems. A quite routine operation. Next morning she was with her mother and several school mates in front of the clinic with the usual anti posters and chants. It appears that she got the abortion she needed and still displayed the appropriate anti views expected of her by her parents, teachers, and peers.” (Physician, Australia) …”
|
|
petep
Legend
Posts: 23,419
|
Post by petep on Apr 30, 2024 17:39:57 GMT
I’d be willing to bet that most every woman who is happy to be pregnant sees her growing baby inside her.
And almost every person seeking an abortion sees a clump of cells that mean nothing besides a nuisance. Not all. But most.
Funny how perspective changes the definition of what is the exact same thing.
|
|
Paleocon
Legend
We spent 50 Years fighting the USSR just to become a gay, retarded version of It.
Posts: 6,286
|
Post by Paleocon on Apr 30, 2024 17:45:20 GMT
I’d be willing to bet that most every woman who is happy to be pregnant sees her growing baby inside her. And almost every person seeking an abortion sees a clump of cells that mean nothing besides a nuisance. Not all. But most. Funny how perspective changes the definition of what is the exact same thing. Animals eat their young and instinctively engage in coitus when the mood strikes them. Seems that those recessive traits that humans evolved beyond have re-emerged in abortion supporters.
Savages.
|
|
petep
Legend
Posts: 23,419
|
Post by petep on Apr 30, 2024 17:48:24 GMT
I’d be willing to bet that most every woman who is happy to be pregnant sees her growing baby inside her. And almost every person seeking an abortion sees a clump of cells that mean nothing besides a nuisance. Not all. But most. Funny how perspective changes the definition of what is the exact same thing. Animals eat their young and instinctively engage in coitus when the mood strikes them. Seems that those recessive traits that humans evolved beyond have re-emerged in abortion supporters.
Savages.
I’d also bet that most all people including abortion supporters support the federal law that murdering a pregnant woman is a double homicide. So it’s a not a person when it’s convenient.
|
|
|
Post by thecitizen on Apr 30, 2024 19:28:17 GMT
Do you believe that all third trimester pregnancies are viable? See this is exactly why idiots like you should not be making laws about abortion I don’t believe that. When you ask a question, wait for the person to respond. But I linked to an article that clearly stated that not every late term abortion is due to the baby not being viable. Are you going to pretend it’s not in there again? Pretend that you see every other paragraph except for those? Like you did before? What the fuck are you talking about? I responded to your stupid post. What was I supposed to wait for. Your link said nothing about viablity, you fucking idiot.
|
|
petep
Legend
Posts: 23,419
|
Post by petep on Apr 30, 2024 19:36:06 GMT
I don’t believe that. When you ask a question, wait for the person to respond. But I linked to an article that clearly stated that not every late term abortion is due to the baby not being viable. Are you going to pretend it’s not in there again? Pretend that you see every other paragraph except for those? Like you did before? What the fuck are you talking about? I responded to your stupid post. What was I supposed to wait for. Your link said nothing about viablity, you fucking idiot. Let’s make this easy wads. Assume the mother and baby are perfectly healthy. No abnormalities. Is there a month out of 9 after which you’d say no more abortions. Or is a late term abortion - baby is about to crown - all still ok. Or do you want to keep arguing theories but never take a stand.
|
|
|
Post by thecitizen on Apr 30, 2024 19:45:10 GMT
What the fuck are you talking about? I responded to your stupid post. What was I supposed to wait for. Your link said nothing about viablity, you fucking idiot. Let’s make this easy wads. Assume the mother and baby are perfectly healthy. No abnormalities. Is there a month out of 9 after which you’d say no more abortions. Or is a late term abortion - baby is about to crown - all still ok. Or do you want to keep arguing theories but never take a stand. That just does not happen. As I said many, many times on this forum. less than 1% of abortions are after 24 weeks. Why do you people dwell on that. Why? Because you know that your argument on the 98% of abortions in the 1st trimester is a fail.
|
|
sokpupet
Legend
Go Dark Brandon!
Posts: 5,222
|
Post by sokpupet on Apr 30, 2024 20:03:10 GMT
Do you believe that all third trimester pregnancies are viable? See this is exactly why idiots like you should not be making laws about abortion I don’t believe that. When you ask a question, wait for the person to respond. But I linked to an article that clearly stated that not every late term abortion is due to the baby not being viable. Are you going to pretend it’s not in there again? Pretend that you see every other paragraph except for those? Like you did before? “… The analysis shows that abortions at or after 21 weeks are uncommon and represent 1% of all abortions in the U.S. Ninety-six percent occurred at or before 15 weeks gestation, while 3% occurred from 16 to 20 weeks gestation. Notably, discussions about abortions occurring later in pregnancy are often fraught with misinformation; in fact, abortions occurring “moments before birth” or even “after birth” are illegal in the U.S. and do not occur. KFF also looks at the other issues with abortions later in pregnancy, including the expense of the procedures, which often require travel and lost wages, and the lack of availability given that they are only performed by a fraction of abortion providers. Additionally, KFF explores why people seek abortions later in pregnancy, including medical concerns such as fetal anomalies, maternal health, or life endangerment, as well as barriers to care that cause delays in obtaining an abortion. …” www.kff.org/womens-health-policy/issue-brief/abortions-later-in-pregnancy-in-a-post-dobbs-era/
|
|
Odysseus
Legend
Trump=Chump
Posts: 39,224
|
Post by Odysseus on Apr 30, 2024 20:03:36 GMT
Let’s make this easy wads. Assume the mother and baby are perfectly healthy. No abnormalities. Is there a month out of 9 after which you’d say no more abortions. Or is a late term abortion - baby is about to crown - all still ok. Or do you want to keep arguing theories but never take a stand. That just does not happen. As I said many, many times on this forum. less than 1% of abortions are after 24 weeks. Why do you people dwell on that. Why? Because you know that your argument on the 98% of abortions in the 1st trimester is a fail.
1st Trimester = 12 weeks 2nd Trimester = 24 weeks 3rd Trimester = 36 weeks
(Above are approximate)
|
|
|
Post by thecitizen on Apr 30, 2024 20:06:16 GMT
That just does not happen. As I said many, many times on this forum. less than 1% of abortions are after 24 weeks. Why do you people dwell on that. Why? Because you know that your argument on the 98% of abortions in the 1st trimester is a fail.
1st Trimester = 12 weeks 2nd Trimester = 24 weeks 3rd Trimester = 36 weeks
(Above are approximate)
OK....and.......
|
|