Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 27, 2020 17:30:44 GMT
Yes. In fact, most hunter safety courses are filled with kids between 12 and 18 and they do fire guns after the course has been completed. I must have missed where a safety course (Which would be in a controlled area and usually requires documents to be signed prior to the course) is equatable to obtaining and firing a weapon in public that you don’t own. Probably because they are completely unrelatable scenarios. Well, hunter's safety courses typically have guns that students can use at the end of the class. They are then supervised by adults that are volunteers and/or instructors. It is also legal for people under 18 to use a firearm in public, not associated with a class, for other legal purposes...like hunting. But they must be supervised by an adult. I am not aware of any law that say a relative over 18, they just specify an adult that is at least 18 years of age. Y'all clearly have no clue what the laws are. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 27, 2020 17:32:07 GMT
Yes. In fact, most hunter safety courses are filled with kids between 12 and 18 and they do fire guns after the course has been completed.
He wasn't in Wisconsin hunting. He clearly said what he was there for. It wasn't hunting.
Greg
That's not the point. The claim was that he can't have a fire arm, period. I provided one obvious example where he can have a firearm. Your article even said that he can have the firearm. You even posted the part that said he can have the firearm. Why is this even a debate? |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 27, 2020 17:33:02 GMT
Nothing like that exists as of yet. I am going off videos, photos and first hand accounts I am seeing on social media. I would note you haven't asked any of the folks who incorrectly claimed a molotov was thrown to back up their claims. I wonder why that is? Probably because I have no earthly clue what you are talking about. All we know is that he was being chased when he fell and it wasn't until he fell (in the videos) that he chose to fire his weapon. That is not murder. Nor has any outlet reported that there was a shot fired before the video. Until information comes out that supports these claims, I'm hesitant to believe them. Remember the lie that was "hands up, don't shoot"? The reality was that it was a fist fight that Brown was winning and the shooting was justified. Don't be an Obama, and scapegoat a kid who may be justified in his actions. Here is a timeline pieced together from the videos and eye witness accounts. |
|
|
|
Post by Fiddler on Aug 27, 2020 17:33:58 GMT
I went looking for a report that backs your claim. Do you have one? I would note you haven't asked any of the folks who incorrectly claimed a molotov was thrown to back up their claims. I wonder why that is?
That's because he has no problem posting bullshit and then defending the lie when it suits his narrative .. Link
|
|
|
|
Post by phillip on Aug 27, 2020 17:34:33 GMT
I must have missed where a safety course (Which would be in a controlled area and usually requires documents to be signed prior to the course) is equatable to obtaining and firing a weapon in public that you don’t own. Probably because they are completely unrelatable scenarios. Well, hunter's safety courses typically have guns that students can use at the end of the class. They are then supervised by adults that are volunteers and/or instructors. It is also legal for people under 18 to use a firearm in public, not associated with a class, for other legal purposes...like hunting. But they must be supervised by an adult. I am not aware of any law that say a relative over 18, they just specify an adult that is at least 18 years of age. Y'all clearly have no clue what the laws are. You have to be 21 to own a semi-automatic rifle. No hunter course will change that for a 17 year old. Try again. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 27, 2020 17:35:13 GMT
Probably because I have no earthly clue what you are talking about. All we know is that he was being chased when he fell and it wasn't until he fell (in the videos) that he chose to fire his weapon. That is not murder. Nor has any outlet reported that there was a shot fired before the video. Until information comes out that supports these claims, I'm hesitant to believe them. Remember the lie that was "hands up, don't shoot"? The reality was that it was a fist fight that Brown was winning and the shooting was justified. Don't be an Obama, and scapegoat a kid who may be justified in his actions. Here is a timeline pieced together from the videos and eye witness accounts. Ok, by your own accounts he was attacked first. It's self defence. End of story. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 27, 2020 17:36:39 GMT
Well, hunter's safety courses typically have guns that students can use at the end of the class. They are then supervised by adults that are volunteers and/or instructors. It is also legal for people under 18 to use a firearm in public, not associated with a class, for other legal purposes...like hunting. But they must be supervised by an adult. I am not aware of any law that say a relative over 18, they just specify an adult that is at least 18 years of age. Y'all clearly have no clue what the laws are. You have to be 21 to own a semi-automatic rifle. No hunter course will change that for a 17 year old. Try again. Or for crying out loud, you don't have to own it to use it. What do you think you are doing here? |
|
|
|
Post by Greg55_99 on Aug 27, 2020 17:37:23 GMT
He wasn't in Wisconsin hunting. He clearly said what he was there for. It wasn't hunting.
Greg
That's not the point. The claim was that he can't have a fire arm, period. I provided one obvious example where he can have a firearm. Your article even said that he can have the firearm. You even posted the part that said he can have the firearm. Why is this even a debate?
Not in the State of Wisconsin. He is an Illinois resident. He was NOT in Wisconsin hunting. He said so. Wanna see?
No hunting.
Greg
|
|
|
|
Post by archie on Aug 27, 2020 17:37:47 GMT
So it is your assertion that he was there alone? Apparently, he was there WITHOUT parental supervision. Are you implying his hanging with a vigilante group qualifies as adult supervision?
Greg
Greg, the kid was under attack. If I was a kid being attacked like that, I would have shot them too if I had a gun. No gun, and I would have did my best to kill them with the dagger I used to carry before I was old enough to have a gun permit. I still have that dagger, made in Germany. I can put a nickel on a board, and plunge the dagger through it without causing damage to the knife. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 27, 2020 17:38:16 GMT
Here is a timeline pieced together from the videos and eye witness accounts. Ok, by your own accounts he was attacked first. It's self defence. End of story. Jesus Christ. He points a rifle at people and then someone throws a bag at him and you say he was attacked first? You think someone tossing trash at you is a justifiable reason to kill them? Sorry. No. Politics has completely warped your sensibilities. |
|
|
|
Post by phillip on Aug 27, 2020 17:41:38 GMT
You have to be 21 to own a semi-automatic rifle. No hunter course will change that for a 17 year old. Try again. Or for crying out loud, you don't have to own it to use it. What do you think you are doing here? He didn’t randomly pick it off the ground. He illegally brought and possessed a fire arm he was not licensed to own. Stop embarrassing yourself, it’s pathetic. |
|
|
|
Post by Greg55_99 on Aug 27, 2020 17:44:59 GMT
Probably because I have no earthly clue what you are talking about. All we know is that he was being chased when he fell and it wasn't until he fell (in the videos) that he chose to fire his weapon. That is not murder. Nor has any outlet reported that there was a shot fired before the video. Until information comes out that supports these claims, I'm hesitant to believe them. Remember the lie that was "hands up, don't shoot"? The reality was that it was a fist fight that Brown was winning and the shooting was justified. Don't be an Obama, and scapegoat a kid who may be justified in his actions. Here is a timeline pieced together from the videos and eye witness accounts.
Actually TL, between step 9 and 10,
9A - Rittenhouse raises his arms above his head and approaches police car 9B - Members of crowd yell at police, point at Rittenhouse and yell he has shot several people. 9C - Police take no action, wave Rittenhouse on by. 9D - Rittenhouse returns home to Illinois
Greg
|
|
|
|
Post by archie on Aug 27, 2020 17:58:09 GMT
Well, hunter's safety courses typically have guns that students can use at the end of the class. They are then supervised by adults that are volunteers and/or instructors. It is also legal for people under 18 to use a firearm in public, not associated with a class, for other legal purposes...like hunting. But they must be supervised by an adult. I am not aware of any law that say a relative over 18, they just specify an adult that is at least 18 years of age. Y'all clearly have no clue what the laws are. You have to be 21 to own a semi-automatic rifle. No hunter course will change that for a 17 year old. Try again. Unless the law has changed, my brother and I were teenagers with semi auto rifles. One that is still produced and of great quality like we had years ago is the Ruger semi auto 22. Ruger 10/22 22LR Illinois 200 Year Anniversary Rimfire Rifle • $349.99 In Stock • Brand: Ruger • Item Number: 31108 |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 27, 2020 17:59:39 GMT
1) what does a state border have to do with anything? 2) Back, front, side...what difference does that make when he's being attacked by a growing mob? This isn't a game of tag! There are no bases. The threat continued even after the first shot. 3) If the Dimwhitacrat Gov. of Wisconsin hadn't hesitated, there wouldn't have been any violence. The narrative about him being attacked without provocation is BS. He wasn't attacked until he killed that first man. And it appears all of this started because he was pointing his muzzle at protestors. No, it all "started" when the protesters reacted to the muzzle being pointed. They could have moved on like normal people do when facing such a threat.
The footage shows an armed man walking down the street with protesters in pursuit — reportedly after he’d shot a demonstrator in the head.
The gunman, holding a rifle, stumbles to the ground and is battered with a skateboard and hit with a flying kick — and responds by opening fire, striking two of the demonstrators, with one seen clutching his chest as he walks away.
Being "battered by a skateboard and hit with a flying kick" is attempted murder. The protesters had no authority or right to attempt to beat the guy to death, did they?
And the first protester sex offender was chasing Rittenhouse as fast as he can go, throwing something at him. Not very peaceful and not very smart when the guy he was chasing was armed.
But liberals are too stupid to wait for the entire story to come out. Riot first and ask questions later.
|
|
|
|
Post by phillip on Aug 27, 2020 18:03:50 GMT
You have to be 21 to own a semi-automatic rifle. No hunter course will change that for a 17 year old. Try again. Unless the law has changed, my brother and I were teenagers with semi auto rifles. One that is still produced and of great quality like we had years ago is the Ruger semi auto 22. Ruger 10/22 22LR Illinois 200 Year Anniversary Rimfire Rifle • $349.99 In Stock • Brand: Ruger • Item Number: 31108 21 in Illinois. Regardless of age, there is no evidence he lawfully purchased and licensed it anyways so far. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 27, 2020 18:11:46 GMT
Ok, by your own accounts he was attacked first. It's self defence. End of story. Jesus Christ. He points a rifle at people and then someone throws a bag at him and you say he was attacked first? You think someone tossing trash at you is a justifiable reason to kill them? Sorry. No. Politics has completely warped your sensibilities. What? The guy didn't just "throw a bag" at Rittenhouse. That protester was chasing Rittenhouse through the streets and threw the bag during this balls to the wall chase. What kind of moron starts chasing someone who is armed with an AR-15?
This first victim has been identified as Joseph “Jojo” Rosenbaum, who is a registered sex offender from Kenosha
Try less propaganda and more facts next time.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 27, 2020 18:20:31 GMT
All these people arguing about things they don't know.
Fascinating.
Or just politics as usual. Same same.
Queshank
|
|
|
|
Post by Greg55_99 on Aug 27, 2020 18:22:46 GMT
All these people arguing about things they don't know. Fascinating. Or just politics as usual. Same same. Queshank
So Q... You DO know you're on the LNF. Right?
Greg
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 27, 2020 18:25:26 GMT
All these people arguing about things they don't know. Fascinating. Or just politics as usual. Same same. Queshank
So Q... You DO know you're on the LNF. Right?
Greg
 Yes, but even here I don't get involved in conversations where literally nobody in the world knows wtf they're talking about. I'm surprised you guys have filled 8 pages with speculation, innuendo and conspiracy theories. Queshank |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 27, 2020 18:32:51 GMT
You gotta admit tho Greg ... your response fits well within this framework too:
"You DO know you're watching American news media. Right?"
I mean, you guys are just acting as avatars of our nightly punditry based on your preferred pundit narrative. Sock puppets of a sort.
Queshank
|
|
