Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 27, 2020 16:19:14 GMT
Interestingly enough, there are some doctored photos going around showing the bag on fire. But that narrative is busted by even better photos of an unburnt plastic bag lying on the ground. A thrown plastic bag that’s on fire? Okie dokie lol... Well, in the doctored photo, it is made to look like a molotov. Looks like D-man got the talking points on that rather quickly. |
|
|
|
Post by Greg55_99 on Aug 27, 2020 16:24:46 GMT
A thrown plastic bag that’s on fire? Okie dokie lol... Well, in the doctored photo, it is made to look like a molotov. Looks like D-man got the talking points on that rather quickly.
Who? Oh... Turd Blossom... Him...
Greg
|
|
|
|
Post by phillip on Aug 27, 2020 16:29:55 GMT
Interestingly enough, there are some doctored photos going around showing the bag on fire. But that narrative is busted by even better photos of an unburnt plastic bag lying on the ground.
It could have been a bag of shit.
Coals to Newcastle.
A bag of shit? Isn’t that best known as a Solar? |
|
|
|
Post by Fiddler on Aug 27, 2020 16:38:16 GMT
It could have been a bag of shit.
Coals to Newcastle.
A bag of shit? Isn’t that best known as a Solar?
Superfly ..!
|
|
RWB
Legend
Posts: 12,825
|
Post by RWB on Aug 27, 2020 16:40:21 GMT
Of course, our unhinged white-wing friends are going to defend this guy. One thing I would point out, though, judging from the videos and first-hand accounts I have seen/heard, the dominant narrative is that this young man had something thrown at him by a protestor, and as this protestor was running away, he opened fire into his back, at roughly 20 feet away. At this point, he became a murderer and was chased/attacked by the crowd. That's when he shoots another protestor and wounds a first responder in the arm. There does not seem to be any evidence to suggest these killings were done in self-defense. IF what you say is true then he's guilty of one murder |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 27, 2020 16:43:05 GMT
You might want to prove the premise of your question. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 27, 2020 16:44:25 GMT
Of course, our unhinged white-wing friends are going to defend this guy. One thing I would point out, though, judging from the videos and first-hand accounts I have seen/heard, the dominant narrative is that this young man had something thrown at him by a protestor, and as this protestor was running away, he opened fire into his back, at roughly 20 feet away. At this point, he became a murderer and was chased/attacked by the crowd. That's when he shoots another protestor and wounds a first responder in the arm. There does not seem to be any evidence to suggest these killings were done in self-defense. IF what you say is true then he's guilty of one murder I count two. And one charge of attempted murder on the first responder. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 27, 2020 16:45:38 GMT
You might want to prove the premise of your question. Lol. Oh sure! Driving across state lines to shoot people in the back. This is normal behavior. |
|
RWB
Legend
Posts: 12,825
|
Post by RWB on Aug 27, 2020 16:45:51 GMT
Reminds RWB of himself when he was a 17 year old virgin.
And now RWB is a 57 year old virgin.
the only time you had pussy was when pussy had you. OH WAIT you were an ASSHOLE baby. |
|
RWB
Legend
Posts: 12,825
|
Post by RWB on Aug 27, 2020 16:48:11 GMT
IF what you say is true then he's guilty of one murder I count two. And one charge of attempted murder on the first responder. nope 2nd murder was self defense. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 27, 2020 16:50:44 GMT
I count two. And one charge of attempted murder on the first responder. nope 2nd murder was self defense. Nah, son, killers don't have the right to self defense. The crowd was exercising that right, not the aggressor. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 27, 2020 16:54:07 GMT
You might want to prove the premise of your question. Lol. Oh sure! Driving across state lines to shoot people in the back. This is normal behavior. 1) what does a state border have to do with anything? 2) Back, front, side...what difference does that make when he's being attacked by a growing mob? This isn't a game of tag! There are no bases. The threat continued even after the first shot. 3) If the Dimwhitacrat Gov. of Wisconsin hadn't hesitated, there wouldn't have been any violence. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 27, 2020 16:56:19 GMT
Lol. Oh sure! Driving across state lines to shoot people in the back. This is normal behavior. 1) what does a state border have to do with anything? 2) Back, front, side...what difference does that make when he's being attacked by a growing mob? This isn't a game of tag! There are no bases. The threat continued even after the first shot. 3) If the Dimwhitacrat Gov. of Wisconsin hadn't hesitated, there wouldn't have been any violence. The narrative about him being attacked without provocation is BS. He wasn't attacked until he killed that first man. And it appears all of this started because he was pointing his muzzle at protestors. |
|
Odysseus
Legend
Trump = Disaster
Posts: 41,115
|
Post by Odysseus on Aug 27, 2020 16:56:20 GMT
nope 2nd murder was self defense. Nah, son, killers don't have the right to self defense. The crowd was exercising that right, not the aggressor.
Abesolutely!
In what insane universe is a crowd, trying to stop a murderer from killing more, not a case of self-defense - by the crowd?
|
|
Odysseus
Legend
Trump = Disaster
Posts: 41,115
|
Post by Odysseus on Aug 27, 2020 16:57:23 GMT
1) what does a state border have to do with anything? 2) Back, front, side...what difference does that make when he's being attacked by a growing mob? This isn't a game of tag! There are no bases. The threat continued even after the first shot. 3) If the Dimwhitacrat Gov. of Wisconsin hadn't hesitated, there wouldn't have been any violence. The narrative about him being attacked without provocation is BS. He wasn't attacked until he killed that first man. And it appears all of this started because he was pointing his muzzle at protestors.
I don't know about Wisconsin, but where I live simply pointing a firearm at a human is considered assault.
|
|
|
|
Post by phillip on Aug 27, 2020 17:00:22 GMT
A bag of shit? Isn’t that best known as a Solar?
Superfly ..!
DIG IT! |
|
|
|
Post by Greg55_99 on Aug 27, 2020 17:01:24 GMT
Lol. Oh sure! Driving across state lines to shoot people in the back. This is normal behavior. 1) what does a state border have to do with anything? 2) Back, front, side...what difference does that make when he's being attacked by a growing mob? This isn't a game of tag! There are no bases. The threat continued even after the first shot. 3) If the Dimwhitacrat Gov. of Wisconsin hadn't hesitated, there wouldn't have been any violence.
State border he crossed into was Wisconsin. it's illegal for him to possess a long gun in Wisconsin.
Greg
|
|
|
|
Post by phillip on Aug 27, 2020 17:03:47 GMT
Of course, our unhinged white-wing friends are going to defend this guy. One thing I would point out, though, judging from the videos and first-hand accounts I have seen/heard, the dominant narrative is that this young man had something thrown at him by a protestor, and as this protestor was running away, he opened fire into his back, at roughly 20 feet away. At this point, he became a murderer and was chased/attacked by the crowd. That's when he shoots another protestor and wounds a first responder in the arm. There does not seem to be any evidence to suggest these killings were done in self-defense. IF what you say is true then he's guilty of one murder So suddenly, “defending” yourself after committing a murder when people try to stop you from killing more is not a murder when you shoot at them too? Ok then lol. |
|
|
|
Post by phillip on Aug 27, 2020 17:07:29 GMT
1) what does a state border have to do with anything? 2) Back, front, side...what difference does that make when he's being attacked by a growing mob? This isn't a game of tag! There are no bases. The threat continued even after the first shot. 3) If the Dimwhitacrat Gov. of Wisconsin hadn't hesitated, there wouldn't have been any violence.
State border he crossed into was Wisconsin. it's illegal for him to possess a long gun in Wisconsin.
Greg
Not to mention being in another state negates the possibility he used the weapon in the premises of his own home as self-defense. He openly brandished a weapon he had no right to even own. And strangely, conservatives are usually the ones making a big fuss out of someone actively committing a crime prior to the violent incident occurring. Granted, this one didn’t involve a fake $20 bill. 😉 |
|
|
|
Post by Fiddler on Aug 27, 2020 17:08:24 GMT
IF what you say is true then he's guilty of one murder So suddenly, “defending” yourself after committing a murder when people try to stop you from killing more is not a murder when you shoot at them too? Ok then lol.
Yes .. it's a take on the Zimmerman defense ..
|
|
