Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 25, 2020 12:55:11 GMT
Why did Trump say Obama, Biden, Comey and the rest should apologize?
Smoking Gun?
|
|
|
|
Post by crepe05 on Jun 25, 2020 13:12:02 GMT
General Flynn has had to spend a few million dollars in legal fees throughout this mess. His time and money are valuable. That hate of the dems toward the military showed its evil head (and the rest of the body of the dem party), and that's not going to going away. Plus, in case you haven't noticed, the dems aren't that wild (in a positive way) about the President. It's definitely a roller coaster ride for all concerned.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 25, 2020 13:39:10 GMT
Is Flynn free?
What are the odds of the court of appeals decision being appealed?
It's not over.
|
|
Greg55_99
Legend
Posts: 23,116 
Member is Online
|
Post by Greg55_99 on Jun 25, 2020 13:47:25 GMT
Is Flynn free? What are the odds of the court of appeals decision being appealed? It's not over. Nope, not over. Greg |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 25, 2020 16:35:44 GMT
Is Flynn free? What are the odds of the court of appeals decision being appealed? It's not over. Nope, not over. Greg The entity that would challenge the ruling is the entity that asked for this ruling. But, now, begins the litigation portion. Expect Flynn to take the FBI to court to get his legal fees reimbursed. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 25, 2020 16:41:37 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by atreyu on Jun 25, 2020 16:42:10 GMT
General Flynn has had to spend a few million dollars in legal fees throughout this mess. His time and money are valuable. That hate of the dems toward the military showed its evil head (and the rest of the body of the dem party), and that's not going to going away. Plus, in case you haven't noticed, the dems aren't that wild (in a positive way) about the President. It's definitely a roller coaster ride for all concerned.
Sure, I'll hate a member of the military if they are a traitor to the country.
Who wouldn't?
|
|
|
|
Post by atreyu on Jun 25, 2020 16:43:06 GMT
The entity that would challenge the ruling is the entity that asked for this ruling. But, now, begins the litigation portion. Expect Flynn to take the FBI to court to get his legal fees reimbursed.
Not even close to being over.
|
|
|
|
Post by crepe05 on Jun 25, 2020 16:47:03 GMT
I would not want to be the FBI and have Gen Flynn rightfully angry with me. I know that Hell has no fury like a woman scorned, , except for the furyn of a five star (I think) General whose reputation has been greatly damaged by lies, lies, and then more lies.
|
|
|
|
Post by atreyu on Jun 25, 2020 20:45:39 GMT
I would not want to be the FBI and have Gen Flynn rightfully angry with me. I know that Hell has no fury like a woman scorned, , except for the furyn of a five star (I think) General whose reputation has been greatly damaged by lies, lies, and then more lies.
Yes, Flynn's lies greatly damaged himself. He even admitted to them.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 26, 2020 14:44:45 GMT
I am not wrong: The court ordered Judge Sullivan to dismiss the case. He cannot defy the order or he will be in contempt of court. It will be dismissed. The only entity that wouldn't want that to happen is the Justice Department and they asked Sullivan to drop the charges as well. There is no party of interest that can and will appeal this move. It is over. |
|
Greg55_99
Legend
Posts: 23,116
Member is Online
|
Post by Greg55_99 on Jun 26, 2020 15:11:33 GMT
No, it's not over. From the Times article:
"But the full appeals court has the option of reviewing the matter, and Judge Sullivan did not immediately dismiss the case in response to the ruling. Instead, he suspended deadlines for further briefs and a July 16 hearing in his review, suggesting he was studying his options or waiting to see what the broader group of judges might do."
It ain't over.
Greg
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 26, 2020 15:28:00 GMT
I am not wrong: The court ordered Judge Sullivan to dismiss the case. He cannot defy the order or he will be in contempt of court. It will be dismissed. The only entity that wouldn't want that to happen is the Justice Department and they asked Sullivan to drop the charges as well. There is no party of interest that can and will appeal this move. It is over. Wrong again. No, it's not over. From the Times article: "But the full appeals court has the option of reviewing the matter, and Judge Sullivan did not immediately dismiss the case in response to the ruling. Instead, he suspended deadlines for further briefs and a July 16 hearing in his review, suggesting he was studying his options or waiting to see what the broader group of judges might do." It ain't over. Greg |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 26, 2020 15:38:44 GMT
I am not wrong: The court ordered Judge Sullivan to dismiss the case. He cannot defy the order or he will be in contempt of court. It will be dismissed. The only entity that wouldn't want that to happen is the Justice Department and they asked Sullivan to drop the charges as well. There is no party of interest that can and will appeal this move. It is over. Wrong again. No, it's not over. From the Times article: "But the full appeals court has the option of reviewing the matter, and Judge Sullivan did not immediately dismiss the case in response to the ruling. Instead, he suspended deadlines for further briefs and a July 16 hearing in his review, suggesting he was studying his options or waiting to see what the broader group of judges might do." It ain't over. Greg LMAO...Your source is Greg? The full appeals court won't review it because the justice department and the defendant want the same thing. There is no benefit to re-reviewing a case that all parties agree upon. The only thing that should be reviewed here is Judge Sullivan's position as a judge. Anyone that thinks the entire appeals court will review this ruling is just holding onto hope that an innocent man will be jailed and that the guilty parties will go unpunished in the name of politics. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 26, 2020 15:44:41 GMT
LMAO...Your source is Greg? The full appeals court won't review it because the justice department and the defendant want the same thing. There is no benefit to re-reviewing a case that all parties agree upon. The only thing that should be reviewed here is Judge Sullivan's position as a judge. Anyone that thinks the entire appeals court will review this ruling is just holding onto hope that an innocent man will be jailed and that the guilty parties will go unpunished in the name of politics. The source is the article you posted, once again proving you don't read your own source articles and/or you have no comprehension skills. Why do you do this to yourself? |
|
|
|
Post by MojoJojo on Jun 26, 2020 19:47:39 GMT
Flynn is a traitor who should be doing time.
That's not to say our national security apparatus is a monstrosity that needs halved, then halved again.
Flynn is still a lying liar who sold his soul to the highest bidder.
|
|
