sokpupet
Legend
Go Dark Brandon!
Posts: 6,239
|
KJV
Apr 3, 2022 3:27:26 GMT
Post by sokpupet on Apr 3, 2022 3:27:26 GMT
I recently found this out.
King James was a gay man. He is buried between two of his lovers.
This is not an inditement on LGBTQ community as I support them.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
KJV
Apr 3, 2022 16:00:11 GMT
Post by Deleted on Apr 3, 2022 16:00:11 GMT
I recently found this out. King James was a gay man. He is buried between two of his lovers. This is not an inditement on LGBTQ community as I support them. As a matter of fact, KJV means Kinky, Jovial and Very naughty...
|
|
|
KJV
Apr 5, 2022 13:24:50 GMT
Post by Mercy for All on Apr 5, 2022 13:24:50 GMT
I recently found this out. King James was a gay man. He is buried between two of his lovers. This is not an inditement on LGBTQ community as I support them. Gay or bisexual? Not sure what the relevance is on the Religion Forum, unless you think it somehow makes a difference to his eponymous translation (an inferior translation, I might add).
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
KJV
Apr 5, 2022 19:37:23 GMT
Post by Deleted on Apr 5, 2022 19:37:23 GMT
I recently found this out. King James was a gay man. He is buried between two of his lovers. This is not an inditement on LGBTQ community as I support them. Gay or bisexual? ... A distinction without a difference back then, most gay men would take wives if only to hide their attraction to people of the same sex. So it's near impossible to know if they had heterosexual sex out of desire or obligation, or if they slept with women fantasizing that they were men.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 5, 2022 19:40:37 GMT
I recently found this out. King James was a gay man. He is buried between two of his lovers. This is not an inditement on LGBTQ community as I support them. ... Not sure what the relevance is on the Religion Forum, unless you think it somehow makes a difference to his eponymous translation (an inferior translation, I might add). The relevance, smart alec, is that gayness is supposed to be a sin and back then one that was punishable by death. So it's a bit ironic don't you think?
|
|
|
KJV
Apr 29, 2022 17:29:14 GMT
Post by Running Deer on Apr 29, 2022 17:29:14 GMT
A distinction without a difference back then, most gay men would take wives if only to hide their attraction to people of the same sex. So it's near impossible to know if they had heterosexual sex out of desire or obligation, or if they slept with women fantasizing that they were men. Hiding is part of it, but duty is also part of it. One duty of a monarch is to produce an heir.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
KJV
Apr 29, 2022 19:41:37 GMT
Post by Deleted on Apr 29, 2022 19:41:37 GMT
A distinction without a difference back then, most gay men would take wives if only to hide their attraction to people of the same sex. So it's near impossible to know if they had heterosexual sex out of desire or obligation, or if they slept with women fantasizing that they were men. Hiding is part of it, but duty is also part of it. One duty of a monarch is to produce an heir. Certainly.
|
|
Odysseus
Legend
Trump = Disaster
Posts: 41,101
|
KJV
Oct 10, 2022 8:45:44 GMT
Post by Odysseus on Oct 10, 2022 8:45:44 GMT
A distinction without a difference back then, most gay men would take wives if only to hide their attraction to people of the same sex. So it's near impossible to know if they had heterosexual sex out of desire or obligation, or if they slept with women fantasizing that they were men. Hiding is part of it, but duty is also part of it. One duty of a monarch is to produce an heir.
Yeah, I would imagine that would be difficult with just butt-sex.
|
|