|
Post by Lomelis on Aug 12, 2020 6:17:08 GMT
Countless members of the Trump Administration have voted by mail, including Trump himself, but that’s apparently a privilege only for the aristocracy. Actually, they like vote by mail, BUT DON'T want the people of Philadelphia, Detroit, Atlanta, Cleveland, St. Louis, Miami, Baltimore and Houston to vote by mail. Wonder why... Greg I don't wonder why. Most of those cities are dirty shitholes that are managed horribly.
|
|
Odysseus
Legend
Trump = Disaster
Posts: 41,115
|
Post by Odysseus on Aug 12, 2020 9:07:16 GMT
Who won the Iowa Democratic primaries? Queshank Wasn't that app and incompetence related? Relevance to mail-in ballots?
Qrank is obsessed with Iowa. Does that mean he's a pig? Protesting against all the pigs that get the knife each day in Iowa?
I dunno.
I do know that Iowa has a unique primary system for Dems, where they use caucuses instead of the usual ballot voting. It's always been complicated and slow.
That aside, today it makes NO difference, because Biden has had enough delegates from other states to clinch the nomination. So Qrank can keep grunting about Iowa all he wants, it won't change a thing.
|
|
Odysseus
Legend
Trump = Disaster
Posts: 41,115
|
Post by Odysseus on Aug 12, 2020 9:08:44 GMT
In nearly every instance there is fraud and misuse involved, even in Oregon link There is a reason the left is pushing for country wide mail in voting, they want indecision and chaos.. They know they cannot win.
Sure, even in person voting. You're not wrong. 0.0028% though. If we should shutdown voting for that percentage then you have no excuse for saving lives related to Covid.
In fact, we that rate, we should just shut down the postal system because even a .0001% chance someone could commit fraud by mail is too much. /s
We should go to a cashless society since there's some fraud by passing fake notes. /s
Holy crap, I just realized licenses get sent in the mail... imagine the fraud. /s
OMG!!!
I just realize I get my credit cards and bank debit cards in the mail too!
Heavens to Betsy! I'm being ripped off!
Not.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 12, 2020 15:36:32 GMT
Who won the Iowa Democratic primaries? Queshank Wasn't that app and incompetence related? Relevance to mail-in ballots?
Relevant to making big changes at the state level in a hurry.
Like shifting focus to mail in ballots.
I'm not against mail in ballots. I'm against this propagandized push to say "it'll be fine! you idiots!1!one!1!!" The idiots are the ones who think there will be no problems.
Queshank
|
|
|
Post by atreyu on Aug 12, 2020 21:14:22 GMT
Wasn't that app and incompetence related? Relevance to mail-in ballots?
Relevant to making big changes at the state level in a hurry.
Like shifting focus to mail in ballots.
I'm not against mail in ballots. I'm against this propagandized push to say "it'll be fine! you idiots!1!one!1!!" The idiots are the ones who think there will be no problems.
Queshank
Who's claiming there will be no problems?
|
|
|
Post by MojoJojo on Aug 12, 2020 21:53:56 GMT
Wasn't that app and incompetence related? Relevance to mail-in ballots? Relevant to making big changes at the state level in a hurry. Like shifting focus to mail in ballots.
I'm not against mail in ballots. I'm against this propagandized push to say "it'll be fine! you idiots!1!one!1!!" The idiots are the ones who think there will be no problems.
Queshank Understood. A POTUS who wants to maintain and enhance our democratic ways would flood the USPS with money, starting a month or two ago. A POTUS who wants to maintain and enhance his chances at winning, would appoint an unqualified Post Master General to ensure there are problems with the mail-in vote.
|
|
Odysseus
Legend
Trump = Disaster
Posts: 41,115
|
Post by Odysseus on Aug 13, 2020 4:06:22 GMT
Wasn't that app and incompetence related? Relevance to mail-in ballots?
Relevant to making big changes at the state level in a hurry.
Like shifting focus to mail in ballots.
I'm not against mail in ballots. I'm against this propagandized push to say "it'll be fine! you idiots!1!one!1!!" The idiots are the ones who think there will be no problems.
Queshank
Again, the Iowa primary problems are long term, due primarily to their unique method of selecting a nominee. They use a caucus system instead of mass balloting. This is time consuming and there was an attempt to fix it while still maintaining the bizarre caucus system. It has NOTHING to do with vote by mail. In fact, it might illustrate why vote by mail would be much superior.
Also, you are ignoring that the Democratic Party in Iowa has determined the results of the primary. You might not like it, but remember that primary voting is largely a party function; it is not governed by federal law and only partially by state law. It really is up the various parties to determine how they select their nominees. It's not up to an internet troll who specializes in circular logic.
|
|
|
Post by phillip on Aug 13, 2020 13:34:37 GMT
Iowa Primary results were certified back in February, back when COVID was a hoax and would disappear by April. Good times.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 13, 2020 16:05:02 GMT
Relevant to making big changes at the state level in a hurry. Like shifting focus to mail in ballots.
I'm not against mail in ballots. I'm against this propagandized push to say "it'll be fine! you idiots!1!one!1!!" The idiots are the ones who think there will be no problems.
Queshank Understood. A POTUS who wants to maintain and enhance our democratic ways would flood the USPS with money, starting a month or two ago. A POTUS who wants to maintain and enhance his chances at winning, would appoint an unqualified Post Master General to ensure there are problems with the mail-in vote. You could flood the USPS with money and it isn't going to fix the problems of trying to restructure our electoral process a few months before the election. Even starting "a month or two ago." Or starting in March when the pandemic started dominating headlines. The USPS isn't going to be the problem. Most of the problems with mail in ballots have occurred *at* the polling places with problems counting or even keeping track of all of the forms. A *government* who wants to maintain and enhance our "democratic ways" would have figured out something decades ago. But we are not a democratic country and our government is not democratically elected. So it seems "democratic ways" is just a piece of propaganda that always seems to pollute the conversation and turn the process into a time wasting debate over straw men. Queshank
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 13, 2020 16:05:37 GMT
Iowa Primary results were certified back in February, back when COVID was a hoax and would disappear by April. Good times. Except Bernie Sanders and his supporters are still waiting on results of his appeal. Queshank
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 13, 2020 20:33:01 GMT
|
|
Odysseus
Legend
Trump = Disaster
Posts: 41,115
|
Post by Odysseus on Aug 13, 2020 23:04:48 GMT
Iowa Primary results were certified back in February, back when COVID was a hoax and would disappear by April. Good times. Except Bernie Sanders and his supporters are still waiting on results of his appeal. Queshank
Not really:
(Dated 4-13-20)
You were saying, Q-bert?
|
|
|
Post by archie on Aug 14, 2020 2:05:00 GMT
Ha ha ha. Voting by mail. If 75% of the people can vote by mail, what happens if there are 50% more votes than the population that is old enough to vote? Hmmnn?
|
|
Odysseus
Legend
Trump = Disaster
Posts: 41,115
|
Post by Odysseus on Aug 14, 2020 2:41:33 GMT
Ha ha ha. Voting by mail. If 75% of the people can vote by mail, what happens if there are 50% more votes than the population that is old enough to vote? Hmmnn?
I'm sure a Super Genius like Archie Coyote will let us know if that ever happens.
If he survives his next experiment, that is.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 14, 2020 14:19:13 GMT
Except Bernie Sanders and his supporters are still waiting on results of his appeal. Queshank
Not really:
(Dated 4-13-20)
You were saying, Q-bert?
What I love about you and Wadsworth is how you both struggle with the little things.
Queshank
|
|