Post by Deleted on May 4, 2021 21:04:07 GMT
The Christians insist that Jesus is the son of god, and I know that they often use the allegory/metaphor excuse whenever something in the bible ANYTHING is proven wrong, it's not wrong it's a metaphor but I have yet to meet a Christian who would say that Jesus being the son of god is a metaphor, no they take it literally, Ok? Let's then examine that ridiculous claim.
They say that Mary (the mother of god) was a virgin, I take it that that too wasn't a metaphor... so, what are the possibilities?
1) Jesus gets all his DNA from his mother: Impossible because in that case Jesus would be female and and perfect copy of his mother.
2) Half of Jesus' DNA comes from his mother and the other half from god (who would then had created half a man from scratch) maybe she was fertilized with the holy spermatozoon or something...
3) Jesus was implanted in Mary (making her a surrogate mother) in which case god created a whole man, from scratch...
So what the Christian are actually saying is that god can create half a man or a whole man from scratch!!! And this is NOT a metaphor!!! Right?
So, tell me, how is that different from Adam and Eve?
Answer: It isn't. It's the exact same thing.
Of course the ignorant imbeciles who invented this story two thousands years ago (give or take a century) didn't see any problem in it. Because
1) They were addressing people who already believed that Adam and Eve was a real thing (Not a metaphor!!) so if god can create two people from dirt, why not three!!!
2) They didn't know squat about biology!!! Less than squat even.
So what you have is a bunch of smug assholes who laugh when you show them stupid mistakes in the OT saying "Hey, don't you see that's it a metaphor!!!"
Yes, but at the same time they have no second thoughts (or first ones) about trying to sell the idiotic story of the "son of god".
The human DNA is arguably one of the most complex (if not the most complex) in Nature, if god can create one from scratch then it's not a big stretch to believe that he did so for the whole animal kingdom. But these idiots never seem to realize that.
In fact I can see them, right at this moment erasing from their addled brains the statement that I've just made, assuming that they read it at all.
They say that Mary (the mother of god) was a virgin, I take it that that too wasn't a metaphor... so, what are the possibilities?
1) Jesus gets all his DNA from his mother: Impossible because in that case Jesus would be female and and perfect copy of his mother.
2) Half of Jesus' DNA comes from his mother and the other half from god (who would then had created half a man from scratch) maybe she was fertilized with the holy spermatozoon or something...
3) Jesus was implanted in Mary (making her a surrogate mother) in which case god created a whole man, from scratch...
So what the Christian are actually saying is that god can create half a man or a whole man from scratch!!! And this is NOT a metaphor!!! Right?
So, tell me, how is that different from Adam and Eve?
Answer: It isn't. It's the exact same thing.
Of course the ignorant imbeciles who invented this story two thousands years ago (give or take a century) didn't see any problem in it. Because
1) They were addressing people who already believed that Adam and Eve was a real thing (Not a metaphor!!) so if god can create two people from dirt, why not three!!!
2) They didn't know squat about biology!!! Less than squat even.
So what you have is a bunch of smug assholes who laugh when you show them stupid mistakes in the OT saying "Hey, don't you see that's it a metaphor!!!"
Yes, but at the same time they have no second thoughts (or first ones) about trying to sell the idiotic story of the "son of god".
The human DNA is arguably one of the most complex (if not the most complex) in Nature, if god can create one from scratch then it's not a big stretch to believe that he did so for the whole animal kingdom. But these idiots never seem to realize that.
In fact I can see them, right at this moment erasing from their addled brains the statement that I've just made, assuming that they read it at all.