|
Post by FEZZILLA on Feb 11, 2021 11:28:01 GMT
This topic is for those who want to study Genesis Chapter 1, verse by verse, Day by Day. To make this study fruitful lets not rush too fast ahead since there is plenty to examine in each creation Day of Genesis. Just one small rule. Whenever you quote one of the verses from Genesis chapter 1, please do so in Bold. Then leave your comments under the verse.
I will merely start this off with the first verse of the Bible.
|
|
|
Post by FEZZILLA on Feb 11, 2021 22:48:19 GMT
Genesis1:1 is the most fundamental verse in all the Bible as well as the most scientific. For those who believe verse 1 will not have problems believing the rest of Scripture. The first act of Day 1 is the creation of space and the necessary ingredients to start crafting all things. The first thing needed is God. Without God building a space to construct planetary systems cannot be done. God Is the Carpenter of carpenters. God the Father put God the Son (Jesus) in the care of Joseph because God saw that Joseph was a righteous man and a fine carpenter. God loves carpenters because they enjoy creating as God loves creating. No Carpenter or Chef shows up for work thinking his supplies will be there. They get their supplies ready before starting their project. Since man is made in the image and likeness of God, logical thinking is also part of us being created by God. The universe and the earth are now birthed...conceived. God creates the universe: space (i.e., expanse), gravity, water, matter, electromagnetic energy and photons -- the basic ingredients needed for the creation of the universe and planetary systems. The earth is now in the earliest stage of conception. The earth cannot live on its own because it is not yet even alive. The earth is a watery mass in this newly created expanse we also call space. Its also important to this study to understand what the word "expanse" means. ✅Webster's 1828 Dictionary says: "EXPANSE, noun expans'. [Latin expansum.] A spreading; extend; a wide extent of space or body; as the expanse of heaven." webstersdictionary1828.com/Dictionary/expanseGod created a space which is the great expanse. No scientist knows the limits of the expanse (i.e., space). Space is a room that God created. The universe is a finite place that had a beginning. Holy Scripture says our Eternal Father deliberately created the universe with a purpose. That purpose revolves around the earth. Humanity is God's greatest goal of creation week. But creating humans is done in steps, as God is the greatest of all scientists and knows what He is doing. This verse in Hebrews alludes to Genesis 1:1 (as well as other acts of creation). Jamieson-Fausset-Brown Bible Commentary www.studylight.org/commentary/hebrews/11-3.html#verse-jfu
|
|
|
Post by FEZZILLA on Feb 11, 2021 22:52:35 GMT
Genesis 1:2,
After the creation of space-time, matter and energy, God's Spirit is now moving over the waters of the earth in its conception. This earth is formless and void, empty of anything we would recognize as earth today. It is noteworthy to see how this was translated in the Greek Septuagint:
✅Word: ἀόρατος (invisible, without form). ✅Word: ἀκατασκεύαστος (without shape). I imagine this watery deep as being similar to a lava lamp, where each bubble is changing shape. This is what is meant by "without shape." So the earth is merely just a very clear watery substance in space. There are no stars at this point and without the light of stars the universe is a very dark place. The watery deep of the earth cannot be seen. This earth had not become a wasteland due to some mysterious gap between Gen.1:1 and 1:2. There is no gap between verses. Verse 1 begins with the universe and the watery heap that will be the earth. Then God's Spirit follows up on that creation of space, and now, having the supplies to start creation, will now begin construction. Though here in verse 2 of Day 1 the earth is empty and void...shapeless and unseen. Recap of Genesis 1:2, ▪️ Gen.1:2 - God follows through with His first act of creation and His Spirit is moving over the watery heap. There is no light yet created. The newly created universe is dark. God moves over the fetal earth which is formless, without shape, and void. God is about to do something to the earth. Below is a gif of how the newly created earth may have looked like (or similar to) in Genesis 1:1-2. media.giphy.com/media/xT8qBk6Mft8WbzCEy4/giphy.gif
|
|
|
Post by FEZZILLA on Feb 11, 2021 23:27:17 GMT
Before preceding any farther, I'll leave the discussion open for additional thoughts or disagreements etc.
|
|
|
Post by FEZZILLA on Feb 13, 2021 22:43:49 GMT
Genesis 1:3 -- The Light
What was the light God created? Some say the universe was created here. But if you hold that position you are overlooking the fact that verse 3 is about the earth as verse 2 confirms. God's Spirit is moving over the earth in it's most fetal stage of creation. As God's Spirit moved over the earth, He speaks: "Let there be light." This light was something God created. Some say the light is God. It is true that God Is Light and Life, Eternal Life. But the light that God created was not Himself nor was this light the sun (as the sun is created on Day 4). The general consensus among creationists is that the light is electromagnetic radiation and photons. While this is respectable, I do have a small problem with that explanation. At this point God's Spirit is hovering over the earth (v.2). He is now going to start creating the earth. Electromagnetic radiation and photons would have just as easily been created in verse 1 of Day 1. With the supply of energy now already created by God, He now creates the light on the earth for the earth. The verse seems to clearly indicate that this light is part of the earth. God's Spirit in the Bible is described as Light and Eternal Life. God is a living Being Who Is the Source of all light and life. With God's Eternal Presence on earth, the earth itself is already in good hands. For God is the greatest of Carpenters and the greatest of Chefs. God now reaches into Himself for the recipe that would bring the light of life upon the earth. Thus God created the core of the earth -- that little sun that burns white hot inside the center of our planet. In the darkness of space the light of this core coming into existence would have been the only truly created light source seen in space, seen through the watery heap, as the universe is still in darkness at this stage of creation. On this fetal earth, it can be safely said that the iron age has begun, as the core is made of iron. Sonoluminescence may explain how God's vocal Command caused the light inside the earth. The star in a jar experiment does shine light onto this subject. However, the science behind Sonoluminescence is sill very young and I believe what God has done here is more advanced that modern knowledge can comprehend. The earth, being a watery deep, unformed and invisible (due to the darkness of space and clarity of water), would not have been filled with landmass at this point. What matter there was to the fetal earth in Genesis 1:1-2 is unknown. What is known is that the earth was made by water (2 Peter 3:5 )...water being the main ingredient to the earth. The core is made up of elements that when combined with water will react and create earth (molten rock, soil, the mantle). As God created the core it would have been seen in space at this time. From far off in the distance, the core would have looked like a Pulsar as it rotated rapidly. The Light of God's Presence would have also been seen. God created everything in essential steps necessary to achieve His goal - the habitable globe, תֵּבֵל, οἰκουμένη. The core is now activated and the earth is now been given the light of life by our Eternal Father. ____________________________________________________________________________ 🌎Genesis 1:4-5 -- Rotation of Earth
Keep in mind there is no sun, moon or stars created yet. If the light created in verse 3 of Day 1 was electromagnetic radiation and photons, how will that explain verses 4 & 5 of Day 1? It really doesn't. If, for example, we were to look into space from the window of the International Space Station, considering there are no stars anywhere in space, we'd see nothing but blackness. What light that could be generated by electromagnetic radiation and photons is not enough to provide a valid explanation of the separation of light and darkness. Scripture says:
The early church fathers speak about Genesis 1:2-5 __________________________________________________________________ 🌎How The Early Church Fathers Understood Day 1
When you read the works of the early church fathers it is important that you understand what you are reading. What you are not reading is Scripture. The early church fathers are not Scripture and should not be read as Scripture. The early church fathers were not scientists and did not understand nor have our modern knowledge of science. So their explanations may at times fall short of our modern knowledge. However, the early church fathers will accurately lay down the basis of how Scripture is to be understood. They understood what Scripture was saying to them but lacked the proper knowledge of science to fully capture the science behind the events. What they do provide is a road map of how we may understand the basic principles of proper exegesis. ✅ Clement of Alexandria (150-215 A.D.)
The following is taken from his writing called The Instructor, which I’m citing from the very last page of Book III entitled To The Paedagous:
✅ St.Ambrose (337-397 A.D.)
Ambrose understands that both the shape of the earth and its rotation began on Day 1. ✅ St.Augustine (354-430 A.D.)
St.Augustine may not be able to identify the source of light on Day 1, but he, like other church fathers, are reading that the earth was round and began to rotate on Day 1. What Augustine has right is how the earth is a sphere and rotating at this point. However, he is having trouble identifying the light. St. Augustine didn't know exactly how the earth turned. But his 4th century mind was on the right idea:
What Augustine gets right is that there is something inside a planet that makes it spin. This he would have solved had he known about the core. From what we read from the early church fathers, its clear to my mind that they were reading a round and rotating earth in Day 1. They were not fools but brilliant ancient scholars who understood Scripture well. On Day 1 God drew the circle on the deep as a building engineer makes designs on constructing a new building. The Scaffolding is up and the shape of the circles of years has now begun from the first full spin of the earth. For God (in verses 4-5) began creating Earth Standard Time. The separation of light and darkness would begin with earth's very first rotation. As the core rapidly spins and forms a chuwg, God ascribed to the earth its spherical shape. The word "chuwg" in Proverbs 8:27 is describing Day 1 of creation. Job 38:14,
As the core rapidly churns, the earth takes on its spherical shape. From the moment of the earth's first spin inertia then becomes law. ▪️ Gen.1:3 - God created the light that gives life to the earth. God created the earth's core. As chemical reactions take place, the core begins to churn rapidly. As it churns the watery heap also begins to slowly turn and take shape as clay to the seal. ▪️ Gen.1:4-5 - Traditionally, these two verses are understood as the earth's first spin. The day-night cycle begins with the earth's first rotation. But the separation of light and darkness would not see fruition until Day 4 when God finishes the day-night cycle.
|
|
|
Post by FEZZILLA on Feb 13, 2021 22:58:22 GMT
Day 1 APPENDIX.
This appendix will break it down the meaning some more. ▪️ Gen.1:1 - God creates the universe: space (i.e., expanse), gravity, water, matter, electromagnetic energy and photons. ▪️ Gen.1:2 - God follows through with His first act of creation and His Spirit is moving over the watery heap. There is no light yet created. The newly created universe is dark. God moves over the fetal earth which is formless, without shape, and void. God is about to do something to the earth. ▪️ Gen.1:3 - God created the light that gives life to the earth. God created the earth's core. As chemical reactions take place, the core begins to churn rapidly. As it churns the watery heap also begins to slowly turn and take shape as clay to the seal. ▪️ Gen.1:4-5 -- Traditionally, these two verses are understood as the earth's first spin. The day-night cycle begins with the earth's first rotation. But the separation of light and darkness would not see fruition until Day 4 when God finishes the day-night cycle. God is creating the earth in stages. God knows if He creates the sun on Day 1 that He'll destroy the earth before it can sustain life. God's not dumb. Verse 3 makes verses 4-5 possible. _____________________________________________________________________________________________________ 🌎A Traditional Basis For The Interpretation Of Gen.1:3.
My interpretation was not blindly applied. I have sound reason to interpret verse 3 as the earth's core. † St.Augustine (354-430 A.D.)
The following citations are taken from Augustine’s book The Literal Meaning of Genesis, Vol.1. (Ancient Christian Writers, Vol.41).
Augustine knows that the light created in verse 3 was not God...as God did not create Himself in verse 3. God created a finite light. Here we see Augustine understood verses 4-5 meaning the earth's rotation but he cannot pin down what is causing it or how the light explains the rotation of the earth? But his exegesis was not in vain. Augustine tells us even the shape of Planet Saturn.
While he is wrong about what causes Saturn's rotation, he understands that something inside the planet is turning like gears of some sort. If he understood more about geology you better believe Augustine would have solved this! Saturn does have a core which caused the planet to spin. Augustine is so close to solving this puzzle yet his knowledge of geology is still not good enough. All I have done here is take the next step where Augustine left off. † St.Ambrose (337-397 A.D.)
The shape...of the circles of years...began at the first dawn of the world. _____________________________________________________________________ 🌎The Separation of Light and Darkness - Exegesis.
Its very important at this point that you clear your mind and reevaluate what it meant to separate the light from the darkness. ▪️Gen.1:4-5: 👉 "4 God saw that the light was good, and God separated the light from the darkness. 5 God called the light Day, and the darkness He called Night. So the evening and the morning were the first day."
▪️Gen.1:18-19: 👉 "18 to rule over the day and over the night, and to divide the light from the darkness. Then God saw that it was good. 19 So the evening and the morning were the fourth day."
In Genesis 1:4-5, people's minds get stuck on the sun and the moon. But the sun and the moon are not yet created. If your mind searches for an outside source then you will not be able to comprehend what was originally intended by the separation of light and darkness. But if you consider an inside source like the core the issue is resolved. This is because God is creating the natural order. He knows beforehand what He wants to accomplish. God is not winging this. He knows what He's doing. The light...the core...gives shape and rotation to this watery sphere. As the earth turns, the Day-Night cycle is being created. Though as you see in Genesis 1:18-19, God finishes what He started on Day 1. The day-night cycle is completed. Hence the separation of the day-night cycle is the rotation of the earth. Its this rotation that allows light to pass on one side of the earth and darkness to pass on the other side. God is creating the earth is very carefully thought out stages. And how do we gauge day and night today? By 1 full rotation of the earth. Its that rotation that separates light from darkness. God did not want to create the sun and moon on Day 1 because that would be self-defeating. God's not dumb. He knows the sun's radiation will damage the earth before the magnetic field has a chance to protect the earth. So God allowed a few days to pass so that the magnetic field would be able to strengthen. When God knew the time was right, He created the sun. Evolutionists have this all backwards. Early earth evolution doesn't have a place to begin without a strong magnetic field from the very start. The existence of water on our watery planet absolutely depends on a STRONG magnetic field! Early earth evolution is a scientific impossibility.
|
|
|
Post by FEZZILLA on Feb 13, 2021 23:43:00 GMT
🌎Day 2 -- Genesis 1:6-8
By verses 4-5 the earth begins to rotate and to take shape. ✅Job 26:10
Here again we have a verse assigned to the creation account with the word chuwg in relation to the boundaries. The KJV says,
Then the NLT says this:
✅Clement of Rome (35 - 99 A.D.),
✅Flavius Josephus (37-100 A.D.),
Both of these quotations are nearly identical in scope. They both indirectly quote from Job 26:7 and they mention the roundness of the earth. So it may be explained that during the earth's first full spin, as it was taking shape, the earth at this time is still among the watery deep in which God "drew the circle" (chuwg) on the face of the deep. The earth at the end of Day 1 is now moving and also taking shape like a clay pottery takes shape: ▪️Job 38:14
Both the KJV and YLT best translate this verse to the correct Hebrew understanding. The earth is turning itself at the end of Day 1. Going into Day 2 God will now separate the waters which He has used to create the earth so far. While God may indeed be separating waters from outside the watery sphere, the more important part of this analysis and what we can be sure of is that God is separating the waters from within the watery sphere. There is no space between the ocean and sky. The whole earth is covered with water and in water. Thus God creates an expanse...a space...between the waters allowing air to flow between the ocean and the newly created sky (earthly atmosphere). The KJV uses the word "firmament" which you will find in the oldest English Bibles as well as modern translations. The proper rendering of the Hebrew word râqîya is "expanse" and not firmament. Here is another complication: Our English translations inherit "firmament" from the Latin Vulgate which inherited it from the Greek Septuagint. On the surface there is nothing wrong with this as the Greek and Latin tend to be more accurate than our English--and, in many cases, the Greek LXX more accurate than the Hebrew Masoretic Text. However, râqîya is a unique word to Hebrew and there was no perfect Greek equivalent when the 72 Jewish elders translated the Hebrew into Greek. The next best thing was "steréōma" (Greek) which has been the oldest translation mistake in the history of Bible translating. By the 19th century this "firmament" (Latin) rendering of râqîya' would be realized. Today, with all the knowledge learned from the Dead Sea Scrolls, most English Bibles are now translating râqîya as the more proper "expanse." râqîya' is a space in between objects. This is called an "expanse." Outer space is an expanse and the space between land and the earthly sky is an expanse. The NLT renders râqîya' this way in Genesis 1:6-7,
The NLT translated râqîya' as "space." Very good! Space is interchangeable with "expanse" in this context. However...
While this rendering of verse 8 is accurate, the NLT decides to blunder a good thing away by rendering Gen.1:14 as,
The error made here is the misuse of the word "sky" when it should read like the MEV,
In verse 8 the word translated "sky" is the Hebrew shâmayim. In verse 8 it is singular and it verse 14 its plural. For in verse 8 shâmayim refers only to the earthly sky. But in verses 1, 14, 15, 17 they refer to the great expanse of outer space. Lexicographers understand this and I'll provide the Strong's definitions below: ✅The New Strong's Expanded Exhaustive Concordance of the Bible - H7549 רָקִיעַ râqîyaʻ✅The New Strong's Expanded Exhaustive Concordance of the Bible - H8064 שָׁמַיִם shâmayimYou can read the definition of râqîya' and see how it does not fully agree with G4733 στερέωμα steréōma. Only in part does râqîya' agree with steréōma. Yet the Hebrew shâmayim and Greek ouranós both agree fully. The lesson here is that not all Hebrew words are easy to translate into other languages. The word râqîya' is the perfect example of how difficult it can be to find an equivalent. While the vast majority of Hebrew words found their Greek and Latin equivalents, râqîya' did not. This is the case with a few well known Greek words that are untranslatable into English...words such as G1933 ἐπιεικής epieikḗs found in Philippians 4:5. The word epieikḗs has such a profoundly unique Greek meaning that it's impossible to capture the meaning into a short Greek-English verse. Yet the Hebrew word râqîya' translates better into English than it does in Greek and Latin. Generally speaking the Greek and Latin are better reads than English. But in the case of râqîya' our modern English "expanse" is perfect with the Hebrew. When you read Genesis Chapter 1 with the correct understanding of râqîya' (expanse), the whole chapter makes perfect sense as it was intended to. ✅ The Webster's 1828 Dictionary defines "expanse" aswebstersdictionary1828.com/Dictionary/Expanse?fbclid=IwAR1J9urhp9lrAAbEUri0gii7gIrcxCs0PobJX7EgNqrwRnCKFEhwn9-IQJgThe expanse covers two things: A large space in between land and sky -- the open expanse. A large extended area of the sea, sky or outer space.
God called the râqîya' (expanse) shâmayim (heaven). So the expanse on Day 2 was created for the purpose of creating our earthly atmosphere (or sky). The earth at this point is unquestionably a fully spherical planet suspended in space over nothing. While darkness still reigns in space, if you were able to see the earth from a distance, you would see a planet that looks a lot like Neptune. The magnetic field is still strengthening, and with God's presence on earth it won't take millions of years before its protecting the earth. But it will take a couple of days for the magnetic field to protect the earth. The earth at this point of creation week is marinating, per se. The earth is not ready for the big bad boy sun.
With the atmosphere now created, the fetal earth is now building up the magnetosphere aided by the core and the earth's rotation. The atmospheric layers of the earth are still fragile moments after creation. The core of the earth acts like a generator which needs a little time to charge up the earth. The "North" (Job 26:7) is now being magnetized by the core which causes our magnetic field. Though while the expanse of the sky now exist, below the sky is nothing but water. Land has not yet appeared on the earth. Evolutionists have this real big problem explaining the origin of water and assume comets from space bombarded our planet and caused water to appear on earth You have to wonder how this water could stay on this earth with the sun pounding on the earth from the start?? Comets impacting the earth will exceed temperatures of 2,000°F. Water boils at 212°F. So even if the earth at this time had an atmosphere there would be no water from comets as it would all be vaporized while entering our atmosphere and on impact. But evolutionists say the earth did not have an atmosphere at this time. Without naturally occurring greenhouse gases, Earth's average temperature would be near 0°F (or -18°C) according to NASA. However, if there was no magnetic field, solar radiation from the sun would scorch the earth relentlessly and neither water or an atmosphere would exist on earth. AAAS is a reliable source of information for evolution theory. In the article linked below, evolutionists say the earth's core didn't even solidify until 500-million years ago. This means that evolutionists believe that all water: the water in our atmosphere, the water of the earth, all evolved without a strong magnetic field www.sciencemag.org/news/2016/04/earth-s-magnetic-field-helped-life-evolve?fbclid=IwAR2x-At8gBvAOwKCSANgZQwEEkrJY1ssfL8V6KhJuDnmHV9L0uA7LSDPlX8I do not care how difficult it is to swallow the explanation I provide here - It cannot be nowhere near as disastrous as the evolutionary model of the early earth. Seriously folks, its a very clumsy and barbaric explanation! Anything evolutionists could possibly get wrong, they got wrong. Any water these comets would bring to the earth would be all scorched as the earth is unable to develop an atmosphere with the sun constantly raping the earth of all things which evolutionists try to explain the origin of life with. There would be no pond for life to evolve from. The sun would molest the pond and the waters would be incinerated, evaporated, and be no more. Pardon me if my science terminology mirrors Emory Tate's chess terminology. Vulgar as it may be but its still a Triple Exclam !!! 🎤 From the Biblical perspective, no explanation for water is necessary.
So who you gonna believe: the Biblical worldview where water makes up the universe, or the evolutionist worldview where trying to explain the origin of water has led to laughter even among their own ranks. You decide..
|
|
|
Post by FEZZILLA on Feb 14, 2021 0:08:27 GMT
🌎Day 3 - Genesis 1:9-10
The core God created was no small thing. Its essential to the earth and without it our planet may not have land and/or be a gas giant. While Jupiter and Saturn are believed to have cores, those cores may not be large enough in proportion to the size of the two gas giants which could explain why they are gas giants. But God wasn't has concerned about creating those planets for habitation like He was the earth. While some may reasonably ask about the formation of the galaxy, it seems clear that Scripture has the creation of our galaxy on Day 4. God is creating in the formation of land. He created the core to aid in that formation of land. From his creation of the core things like molten rock and lava would form what will become on Day 3 as nutrient enriched soil. From the very beginning God drew up the blue prints of His creation. He created many things and caused many chain reactions. God is creating the laws of physics and biology. The mantle of the earth is now visible from earth's orbit. 🌎Genesis 1:11-13
The soil of the earth is now formed and enriched. God now creates the DNA of all plant life and the seeds of life which provide a lush green covering over the earth. The plant life includes trees, of course. The earth is now being oxygen enriched on Day 3. However, plants need time to germinate so God's Spirit is aiding the process. God knows these seeds of life are fragile and allowing the earth a few moments to marinate, per se, before bringing out the big bad boy sun, is essential to the success of all plant life. God's Spirit Is the Gardener which is all that is needed. The creation of earth and all that there is therein is not an act of nature making itself. Rather, God's Eternal Spirit is there creating. The only thing this explanation offers that is naturalist is how God created the laws of physics in such a way that would aid in the process of His creation through natural chemical reactions and nuclear fusion. Take a block of sulfur and carefully cut a small piece of it and dropped it into a flask of water less than half full and see what happens. Now just think of the reaction the earth's core made up of an alloy combination of iron and nickel, along with small amounts of other dense elements like gold, platinum, and uranium - and vast amounts of sulfur! God did all this by Himself. He knew what He was doing and knows all things about how chemical reactions work. Though Sonoluminescence also seems like a fine explanation of how God created the core which would cause land and make plant life possible. God is in control of everything that is being created, and it was God Who created the natural order of things.
Without the gravitational pull on the earth by the moon, one full spin of the earth would take approximately 8 to 12 hours. So for the first three days of creation the earth would have rotated faster if we go by modern calculations. At the end of Day 3, the earth's magnetic field is protecting the earth and plants and trees have had a chance to bring forth seed in God's Presence. With the earth now ready for life, its time to complete the purpose of earth's rotation.
|
|
|
Post by FEZZILLA on Feb 14, 2021 3:05:26 GMT
☀️Day 4 - Genesis 1:14-19
☀️Genesis 1:14,
In Gen.1:4-5, God laid out the blueprints that would separate light and darkness by creating the earth to move in a circle (or to circuit -- H2329 chuwg). This refers to the rotation of the earth which makes it possible for light to pass on one side of the earth while darkness passes to the other side. Now God's purpose for creating a rotating earth is about to reach fruition. ☀️Genesis 1:16,
The word "stars" in Genesis 1:16 means everything that is not the sun or the moon. ✅ The New Strong's Expanded Exhaustive Concordance of the Bible,"H3556 כּוֹכָב kôwkâb, ko-kawb'; probably from the same as H3522 (in the sense of rolling) or H3554 (in the sense of blazing); a star (as round or as shining); figuratively, a prince:—star(-gazer)." www.blueletterbible.org/lang/lexicon/lexicon.cfm?t=kjv&strongs=h3556&fbclid=IwAR0NiVEeJ3mQNU5-qnUZ-pRusws_82kYpLI8DNlMf2VJM7KEHzckwvpQdqMStars are blazing and shinny just as planets are shining, round and rolling (rotating). So while Genesis 1:16 doesn't break down words in modern English (as English didn't exist back then), it does sum up everything considered a star in the Hebrew language. Be sure to see the Gesenius' Hebrew-Chaldee Lexicon definition. The Gesenius' defines "stars" as a "globe" or a "ball." That sums up planets really well. On Day 4 God created all stars, our galaxy, our sun and moon, and solar system. Now God created all the energy needed to complete the universe and our galaxy on Day 1. Some people fuss over how to explain distant starlight in a young universe? While Dr.Russell Humphreys does cover deep insight into gravitational time dilation, I'm not so sure his white hole universe is necessary. Though I doubt any honest physicist can say for absolute certain how old the universe actually is? What happened at the instant stars appeared? How strong was gravity in the early universe: stronger or weaker? How much of the universe filled with light when God called the stars into existence? And if our galaxy was all light during its creation, did that light instantly reach the earth? There are many questions that produce many theories which I'm not gonna dwell on here. This IS NOT natural process at work. God is in control of creating the natural order and through His power He created the stars. I believe God created all other planets on Day 4 (though its unclear if God created planets on Day 1 or Day 4?). God only created the earth to be inhabited. Evolutionists frantically search for a planet with life on it similar to life on earth. Yet evolutionists have not found any life anywhere. Of course, this is not to say there isn't life on some distant planet. But if there is life on another world we definitely don't want to mess with it. It maybe that God confined certain beings for whatever reasons on such and such a planet. But all this talk is pointless as trillions of dollars of advanced research between the U.S., Russia, France and China have never been able to find a planet with life. We can go by the Drake equation and it means nothing. For if we are alone in the universe mathematical odds in favor of life are mere fanciful expressions that make some people feel more secure living in a universe that has other life on it. In reality, the Drake equation has proved to be fruitless as all our astronomic knowledge put together between all Space Agencies has never discovered the existence of life anywhere. SETI has never communicated with other beings from distant planets. This may very well mean we are all alone in this vast universe. Only God and His angels, and the devil and his angels, are among us; angels in front of our eyes but our the naked eye can't see. Maybe there is truth to multiple dimensions of space-time. If that is the case then physicists today have it all wrong. For they teach a pantheist model when they should be trying to search for a monotheistic God Who Authored the existence of space-time, our earth, including our human selves. If scientists put their minds to the things of God perhaps we may once again make giant leaps of discovery. Though as long as science is under the State control of militant atheists those glory days of science are well behind us. For the knowledge of God is the beginning of wisdom. ☀️Genesis 1:17-19,
God set the sun, moon and stars in the expanse of the heavens (i.e., space).
God's has now completed earth standard time. The earth's rotation is now controlled by the moon's lunar gravity. How God created the moon I don't know. It might as been as easy as grabbing a rock and buffing it to fit His expectations. Last but not least. Had God created the sun on Day 1 it would have been self-defeating. The following video is the last scene of the movie "The gods must be crazy." Here you will see a man who is so nervous around a particular women of interest that he becomes clumsy and knocks every thing down. In the process of trying to put cups back on the table he sets a cup up back on the table only for the cup to fall off again. This is the perfect video to showcase the reason why God did not create the sun first. The sun would destroy all life on earth before the magnetic field has a chance to reach full strength! On the evolutionary end of the spectrum, life has no chance. The sun will keep the earth from ever producing life. Water cannot evolve or find a way to remain on earth with the sun scorching the earth every single day. The earth is roasted and a place where no life dwells. Evolutionists pridefully claim the sun is older than the earth. This is very poor science and I find it hard to believe that people still place their faith in the empty words of evolutionists. An earth that is constantly incinerated by the sun cannot hope to develop a magnetic field. What makes matters worse is how evolutionists just assume the magnetic field is there. Early earth evolution skips and jumps over many stages which escapes the notice of many atheists who did not think it over long enough to find all the scientific impossibilities in the theory.
|
|
|
Post by FEZZILLA on Feb 14, 2021 3:11:45 GMT
🌎Day 5 - Genesis 1:20-23
Modern English Version:
Young's Literal Translation:
Revised Standard Version:
▪️Commentary:
Gen.1:20,
God created all the creatures of the sea and every winged creature that flies on the earth in the open expanse of the sky. This open expanse is, of course, the space between land and sky. The birds fly on the earth....on the face of the expanse. Meaning, the birds fly within the earth and not in outer space.
The birds fly above the earth....meaning they fly above the ground, in the air. They don't fly in outer space.
Gen.1:21,
This verse is important to understand which is why I used three translations to better bring out the meaning of a word. The phrase translated "monsters, sea monsters, creatures" is Strong's H8577 תַּנִּין tannîyn. This word is used to mean sea or land monster depending on the context. In this context it refers only to sea creatures. The KJV translates this as "whales." There is no doubt that tannîyn covers whales. But the definition is much broader than just whales. The Hebrew word tannîyn applied to Day 5 means "marine monsters, sea-serpent, dragon, sea monster, whale, vast fish." Everything that swims in the water is covered....including sea dwelling dinosaurs.
God blessed them and created each kind of bird the ability to breed. God blessed all sea creatures, great and small, with the ability to breed.
|
|
|
Post by FEZZILLA on Feb 14, 2021 4:14:10 GMT
🌎Day 6 - Genesis 1:24,
There are many important words here but for the phrase "creeping thing" (English), "reptilia" (Latin) will be the focus here. But lets start with a simple introduction to the Latin word "terrae." The Latin word "terrae" is translated from the Hebrew H776 אֶרֶץ ʼerets and the Greek G1093 γῆ gē. Now "terrae" in Latin means land, earth, or planet. Terra has many applications but here it refers to planet earth. Notice he verse says "...Let the earth bring forth." God commands the earth to bring forth living creatures. Obviously the earth is a living planet. The life of the planet is in the earth's core. The next word used in Gen.1:24 is the Latin "reptilia." This is translated from the Hebrew H7431 רֶמֶשׂ remes. www.blueletterbible.org/lang/lexicon/lexicon.cfm?Strongs=H7431&t=KJV&fbclid=IwAR0Q6RIlx3888cgUBcrvEqCm1oxDcfxnlxLheh24aKHeCfBPPLl5y3L2kxoAny of the beasts that walked the land God created could have been dinosaurs (among other beast of the earth). Genesis doesn't list off every kind of land dwelling beast that walked on land. Even if Genesis did list the names of all creatures created on Day 6 we would not recognize them in our language today. But Scripture does mention reptile which we do recognize and does cover dinosaurs. 🌎Genesis 1:25,
God created the beasts of terrae (the earth). This covers beasts like cattle and all things that move or creep along the ground. The centerpiece of this verse is the Latin phrase "reptile terrae." Now this phrase in Latin in written in the language of paleontology. The Latin break down is required here. ▪️Dinosaur: a word coined in 1841 by paleontologist Sir Richard Owen (though other sources say 1842). The ancient Greek word is δεινός (deinós, “terrible, awesome, mighty, fearfully great”) + σαῦρος (saûros, “lizard, reptile”). From the Greek word we get the Latin dinosaurus. It is the Latin that we English speaking people inherit the word "dinosaur" from. Latin is the language of paleontology. Therefore the St.Jerome's 4th century Latin Vulgate must be consulted over all other languages if we want to understand dinosaurs in Scripture. Latin words that mean dinosaur www.wordhippo.com/what-is/the/latin-word-for-dd28db90cbdcd02fa63a2f16b0d79b11ab268194.htmlHere we notice the leviathan is mentioned as well as giants. The word "dinosaur" in modern taxonomy, however, refers primarily to land dwelling reptiles from the Triassic, Jurassic and Cretaceous periods. But those are the taxonomies according to modern man. Though when we read "reptile terrae" we read two Latin words that literally mean "reptile earth." However, the word "terrae" can also be expressed as the Latin "planeta" (planet). Since the word "dinosaur" means reptile and lizard, the word "reptile" can reasonably be transliterated to the Latin phrase "dinosaurus planeta" (dinosaur planet)! This is not some wild attempt at mental gymnastics either. The transliteration is used today by Latin speaking people. Dinosaurs are both reptiles and great beasts of the earth. Since the word "dinosaur" was not a word until 1841, it would be a highly unusual and unfair display of arrogance to hold the Bible down to modern words. The phrase "reptile terrae" absolutely covers dinosaurs. Another Biblical word used to describe dinosaurs is the word "dragon." The following Old Testament Scripture references describing dinosaurs as "dragons." Dan.14 - Bel and the Dragon! The Latin words used in this account are "draconem" and "draconis." This dragon was worshiped by the Babylonians. I don't think they would make a big deal about modern reptiles and lizards. This dragon was something of Babylonian pride that they worshiped. And dinosaurs would have been rare back in the days of Daniel. What kind of dinosaur this was is uncertain. But Daniel killed the dinosaur to prove to the Babylonians that worshiping dinosaurs is pointless. Although the account is Apocrypha, its still ancient and an authentic writing. The event took place long before 1840 when dinosaurs were pronounce an extinct species. Reference: "1. In scientific usage, any of the animals belonging to the clade Dinosauria, especially those that existed during the Triassic, Jurassic and Cretaceous periods and are now extinct. [from c. 1840]" en.wiktionary.org/wiki/dinosaur?fbclid=IwAR3O4zUL_ejp9md51z4WWmWACapp8oAGPNJ8aKrPedRb0AGBeuktmRKbajcAnd here, in Genesis 1:26, we read "reptile terrae" which means dinosaur planet in general modern usage. God created reptiles small. Even the giant Sauropods were small reptiles when created. But reptiles can continue growing their entire life. Since man's life span in the Antediluvian period was approximately 1000 years, it is only in fairness to conclude that reptiles also lived longer lives back then. This means the small Sauropod created on Day 6 would become a giant. By the time the Flood came, roughly about 1600 or 1800 years after creation, dinosaurs would be ginormous. Here are some other Scripture references to dinosaurs: ▪️ Job 40:15-24 - Behemoth/Sauropod (Possibly a Brachiosaurus) www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Job%2040%3A15-24&version=KJV&fbclid=IwAR3FUjvviIzX-kRh4H1yuGf5Be0Dsibpp0xmu2OgAgKHQDV75KGKaNmASUA▪️ Job 41:1-10 - Leviathan www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Job%2041%3A1-10&version=KJV&fbclid=IwAR1J9urhp9lrAAbEUri0gii7gIrcxCs0PobJX7EgNqrwRnCKFEhwn9-IQJg▪️ Isaiah 27:1 - Leviathan www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Isaiah%2027%3A1%20&version=KJV&fbclid=IwAR2qBG7mrzlNSwkdPIMSWgp3QYF6mzNe7hEmSP3DMrVOwy7HQfkDUqR59II▪️ Isaiah 51:9 - Dragon www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Isa+51%3A9&version=MEV▪️ Jeremiah 51:34 - Dragon www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Jer%2051%3A34&version=KJV&fbclid=IwAR2qBG7mrzlNSwkdPIMSWgp3QYF6mzNe7hEmSP3DMrVOwy7HQfkDUqR59II▪️Psalm 104:25-26 - Leviathan www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Psalm%20104%3A25-26&version=KJV&fbclid=IwAR0AuRRziKK72tylMLNkpl3A7u4fmiWlqmp0xsZmB39_UNHsnbLVj_TFvCE▪️ Isaiah 30:6 - Flying Serpent/Pterosaur/Pterodactyl www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=%20Isaiah%2030%3A6%20&version=KJV&fbclid=IwAR3RHYYzv3g8SQwVBdDoxIjyPURt2ZXtheazC4siiqS2kxSP9cPpGsDfRkA▪️Wisdom 11:17-19 - Theropods www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Wisdom%2011%3A17-19%20&version=RSV&fbclid=IwAR2x-At8gBvAOwKCSANgZQwEEkrJY1ssfL8V6KhJuDnmHV9L0uA7LSDPlX8▪️ Daniel 14:23-29 - Dragon www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Daniel%2014%3A23-29&version=RSVCE&fbclid=IwAR3KwaVIRcx0v-v3ZXQ78kIs5OIY7_AL_mpmVx5mlgV_VEbMMDPppRWKkp0A compliment to Isaiah 30:6 comes from the more ancient Sumerian/Babylonian account: "The Epic of Gilgamesh" (Penguin Classics, p.181 - line 86),
This ancient Sumerian legend of the Thunderbird found its way to North America. What is being described here is a Pteranodon or Pterodactyl. ____________________________________________________________ 🌎Genesis 1:26-27 -- creation of mankind
The Triune Being of God created mankind on Day 6 as well. God created mankind unique, separate in stature from the rest of the wild kingdom. God created man in His own image and likeness. Furthermore, God gave man dominion over all the wild kingdom. Human dominance on earth is seen throughout the pages of history. We humans build great cities, fly airplanes, go to the moon, land machines built by man on Mars. Mankind is truly unique. This is because God created us as a special creation. The earth is rich in nutrients our bodies need to survive. The earth itself is a living planet. In Genesis 2:7 it says,
God created man from the dust...the earth. The word translated "dust" is Strong's H6083 עָפָר ʻâphâr, God breathed into man's nostrils and man became a living soul. Who is God? This is the most important question. Because if this question cannot be answered by the believer then the believer can be led into a great many falsehoods. God is the only Eternal Living Being. God made man out of the earth but it was God's powerful hand working the creation of man. God breathed into man a soul. The soul is of God. Our soul does not make us One with God, or little gods. It means our soul is immortal and only God Himself can condemn it. This is why hell is eternal. Those who chose to separate themselves from Christ will be sent to hell where their souls never die but yet are brought to condemnation for an eternity. God Is an Eternal Being, The Singularity of all there is, was, or ever will be. The only reason why mankind cannot live forever is because of the curse God placed on man and the rest of creation after the fall. God not only gave man dominion over the earth, but God told them to multiply and, in the KJV, "replenish" the earth. Our modern translations use just plain "fill the earth" in this verse. Old Earth Creationists claim the word means that God created other men before Adam. Yet it is also written there was no death before Adam. So OEC has made up a narrative that is not correct. ✅Replenish defined by the 1828 Webster's Dictionary. ✅Strong's H4390 מָלֵא mâlêʼ defines it as, www.blueletterbible.org/lang/lexicon/lexicon.cfm?Strongs=H4390&t=KJV&fbclid=IwAR33Q_EeLL-38BOPtKnTSdCtppLTUHEPAA_HHQtr9jWrhcAv9RxfViYV2l8Now in context with the rest of Scripture is very clear that modern translations have done justice by translating mâlêʼ as "fill." Even in the KJV the word meant fill. You can read literature from America's founding fathers and the word "replenish" is used to mean "fill." It does not mean death before Adam like OEC claims. _____________________________________________________________________________________________________ 🌎 Genesis 2:21-24 -- Eve
God here is performing the world's very first general anesthetic surgery. God removed one of Adam's ribs, extracting Adam's DNA from it to create Eve. After the surgery God closed up the flesh as an surgeon would. God creates woman from man for the purpose of creating a special bond of marriage between man and woman -- "and they shall become one flesh."
Here concludes the lesson on the Day 6. On Day 7, God ceased from His work of creation and dedicated that Day to Himself and the work He had done. God created the earth and all that therein is. Therefore God knew He had the right to enjoy one Day of His creation before sin enters the world. God created the earth for us and He only enjoyed one Day of it for Himself. God is most definitely NOT selfish!
|
|
|
Post by Mercy for All on Feb 14, 2021 21:16:54 GMT
That’s a lot of work. I think if you’re trying for “scripture/science concordance,” though, you’re missing the point of the text.
Also, if you’re primarily relying on Strong’s for definitions, you’re also subjecting yourself to a narrow interpretive range in some cases. You’d be better off with a really good Hebrew lexicon. Apparently HALOT is the BDAG of Hebrew. BDB was the gold standard “back in the day.”
|
|
|
Post by FEZZILLA on Feb 14, 2021 21:41:33 GMT
That’s a lot of work. I think if you’re trying for “scripture/science concordance,” though, you’re missing the point of the text. Also, if you’re primarily relying on Strong’s for definitions, you’re also subjecting yourself to a narrow interpretive range in some cases. You’d be better off with a really good Hebrew lexicon. Apparently HALOT is the BDAG of Hebrew. BDB was the gold standard “back in the day.” Missing the point of the text? Look, I just harmonized the whole chapter. I hate the idea of bragging here since it was God Who gifted me in interpreting prophecy, but last I checked nobody has ever given a scientific harmonization of the account quite like I just did. Generally speaking, the best harmonization is most likely the way it happened. I already know it isn't perfect. But for what its worth it answers some of the hardest questions faced by Christians today with solid exegesis that does not deviate from a single verse in the account. The Strong's I quoted from has a super solid reputation. The Strong's is inexpensive, exhaustive, easy to use, and found in just about every Christian's home. From my experience using multiple lexicons, the Strong's does a fine job supplying accurate word definitions. The BDB is total junk, the Atari to the Strong's Play Station. The BDB follows the KJV more than it does the Hebrew and is NOT user friendly. I have the BDB and never use it. The Strong's is user friendly and it does the job just fine. Its a huge hardcover book loaded with useful information for a very cheap price.
|
|
|
Post by FEZZILLA on Feb 14, 2021 21:58:49 GMT
And yes, it was a lot a work and an extremely hard message to articulate.
|
|
|
Post by Mercy for All on Feb 15, 2021 11:57:28 GMT
Yes. If your point is that Genesis 1 “must be harmonized with science,” then you’re missing the point of the text.
|
|
|
Post by FEZZILLA on Feb 15, 2021 22:16:59 GMT
Yes. If your point is that Genesis 1 “must be harmonized with science,” then you’re missing the point of the text. So what is the point? To compromise the account with modern philosophy? If the account is true it will be verified scientifically. Now, instead of all these vague attacks, maybe you should detail your query. That would be better. That or supply a better harmonization. God is the Author of all scientific knowledge. God created the laws of physics during creation week. Therefore, its reasonable to study the account from a scientific point of view regardless of how advanced the science is to us. Not only does Genesis harmonize perfectly with real science, but this one chapter alone can be used to destroy evolution theory. Here you will see all atheistic skepticism satisfactorily answered. And I never had to bow a knee to compromise. I kept it clean and followed the text verse by verse. Nowhere did I display any fear of humans nor a hint of compromise out of any fear of the State. I do not worship humans, I hate the State, so I just kept it clean and free of all human worship and interpreted each verse as it was meant to be understood. I kept my mind on the things of God and never show fear of humans or their weak, flabby and pointless criticism. Your problem is that you worship humans and fear them as one would a deity. The worship of the State (i.e., evolution theory) is quite common among those who's faith is weak. But I'm trying to help you comprehend and even break your fear of the State. Do you really think the early Christians were willing to compromise their beliefs with Roman deities? No, they didn't. And they became martyrs because of their strong faith. They could have saved their lives by denying Christ for Roman gods but they chose death instead of denial. None of the earth Christians believed in evolution and all rejected the theory. The only reason why a modern christian like yourself believes in evolution is out of fear of what the State will think of you. You bow your knee to humans. I do not. Therefore I kept my commentary clean and free from all fear of humans. I do not care about what scoffers might think. But I do understand that the account is true and stands the test of time.
|
|
|
Post by FEZZILLA on Feb 15, 2021 22:22:03 GMT
Once you break your fear of the State gods (i.e., humans who think they are gods among men) then you will learn to love the Gospel so much more than ever before. But you have to break your fear of the State. They are not gods. They are fools (Psalms 14:1).
|
|
|
Post by Mercy for All on Feb 15, 2021 22:52:39 GMT
Yes. If your point is that Genesis 1 “must be harmonized with science,” then you’re missing the point of the text. So what is the point? To compromise the account with modern philosophy? If the account is true it will be verified scientifically. Now, instead of all these vague attacks, maybe you should detail your query. That would be better. That or supply a better harmonization. God is the Author of all scientific knowledge. God created the laws of physics during creation week. Therefore, its reasonable to study the account from a scientific point of view regardless of how advanced the science is to us. Not only does Genesis harmonize perfectly with real science, but this one chapter alone can be used to destroy evolution theory. Here you will see all atheistic skepticism satisfactorily answered. And I never had to bow a knee to compromise. I kept it clean and followed the text verse by verse. Nowhere did I display any fear of humans nor a hint of compromise out of any fear of the State. I do not worship humans, I hate the State, so I just kept it clean and free of all human worship and interpreted each verse as it was meant to be understood. I kept my mind on the things of God and never show fear of humans or their weak, flabby and pointless criticism. I actually explicated "the point" in my "commentary." The point of Genesis 1 was to counter its contemporary creation stories with the truth. Thus, it uses both the language, symbols, and structures of its contemporaries. That's a huge clue, because it doesn't use the language, symbols, and structure of today's explanations. You can't really know what it means if you don't know what it meant. That's a pretty solid hermeneutic principle. Untrue. Why do you partner with Satan by accusing the brethren? I don't worship the State. Irrelevant. Logical fallacy alert: false equivalence. That is...literally laughable. Well, you do have a serious problem with trying to harmonize the text and science because you don't have a credible grasp of the science. Your understanding of the Big Bang theory is actually quite ludicrous. You use the words "Big Bang" but you have no idea what the theory actually is. You likely also have no idea about the physical evidence that corroborates the theory.
|
|
|
Post by Mercy for All on Feb 15, 2021 22:53:28 GMT
It's also kind of odd that you identity "science" with "the State." Especially if you're American...😂
|
|
|
Post by Mercy for All on Feb 16, 2021 0:43:48 GMT
Here's an interesting approach:
Before you attack someone else, try to articulate their position in your words and get your opponent to agree that you actually understand what they're saying.
|
|