Post by FEZZILLA on Feb 9, 2021 7:52:58 GMT
🐒4th Century St.Augustine Exposes Ape-To-Man Hoax.
When people think of Charles Darwin they think that he was a scientist who discovered something. Evolutionists say Darwin was on to something. The book "Descent of Man" was Darwin's assessment of how humans evolved from ape primates, placing humans into the same pedigree of apes. How many times have you had an atheist say to you "You are an ape"? I lost count on how many times atheists have said this to me. But was Darwin on to something?
Today people think Darwin was some great scientist who proved man evolved from apes. But this careless thinking avoids the reality that what came down to us from Darwinian assumptions had been an ancient mystical belief long before St.Augustine's time. Here, St. Augustine is speaking about the origin and diversity of humans and some myths which have come about since ancient times.
▪️City of God: Book XVI, chapter 8, p.663 (Penguin Classics translation),
"Some years ago, but certainly in my time, a man was born in the East with a double set of upper parts, but a single set of the lower limbs. That is, he had two heads, two chests, and four arms, but only one belly and two feet, as if he were one man. And he lived long enough for the news of his case to attract many sightseers.
In fact, it would be impossible to list all the human infants very unlike those who, without any doubt, were their parents. Now it cannot be denied that these derive ultimately from that one man; and therefore the same is true of all those races which are reported to have deviated as it were, by their divergences in bodily structure, from the normal course of nature followed by the majority, or practically the whole of mankind. If these races are included in the definition of 'human', that is, if they are rational and mortal animals, it must be admitted that they trace their lineage from that same one man, the first father of all mankind. This assumes, of course, the truth of the stories about the divergent features of those races, and their great differences from one another and from us. The definition is important; for if we did not know monkeys, long tailed apes and chimpanzees are not men but animals, those natural historians who plume themselves on their collection of curiosities might pass them off on us as races of men, and get away with such nonsense."
In fact, it would be impossible to list all the human infants very unlike those who, without any doubt, were their parents. Now it cannot be denied that these derive ultimately from that one man; and therefore the same is true of all those races which are reported to have deviated as it were, by their divergences in bodily structure, from the normal course of nature followed by the majority, or practically the whole of mankind. If these races are included in the definition of 'human', that is, if they are rational and mortal animals, it must be admitted that they trace their lineage from that same one man, the first father of all mankind. This assumes, of course, the truth of the stories about the divergent features of those races, and their great differences from one another and from us. The definition is important; for if we did not know monkeys, long tailed apes and chimpanzees are not men but animals, those natural historians who plume themselves on their collection of curiosities might pass them off on us as races of men, and get away with such nonsense."
▪️City of God, Marcus Dods translation:
"Some years ago, quite within my own memory, a man was born in the East, double his upper, but single his lower half--having two heads, two chests, four hands, but one body and two feet like a ordinary man ; and he lived so long that many had an opportunity of seeing him. But who could enumerate all the human births that have differed widely from their ascertained parents? As, therefore, no one will deny that these are all descended from from that one man, so all the races which are reported to have diverged in bodily appearance from the usual course which nature generally or almost universally preserves, if they are embraced in that definition of man as rational and mortal animals, unquestionably trace their pedigree to that one first father of all. We are supposing these stories about various races who differ from one another and from us to be true ; but possibly they are not ; for if we were not aware that apes, and monkeys, and sphinxes are not men, but beasts, those historians would possibly describe them as races of men, and flaunt with impunity their false and vainglorious discoveries."
When Augustine says "born in the east" he is referring to the Hindu countries of India and Pakistan where Hinduism thrived in the 4th century. These ape-man stories all deal with human mutations...or birth defects, that is. Though in time men like Charles Darwin would be the natural historian who would entertain a false theory which placed man in the same pedigree as the monkeys and apes.
Today, Darwin's ape to man theory--borrowed from ancient pagan philosophers--is used to degrade and dehumanize people so that corrupt powers will rule over the masses and strip them of all their earned income and make them slaves to a dictator of the state. It justifies both racism and slavery. St.Augustine mentions how absurd these people were back in his day and now we see why Augustine mentioned their absurdities.
The ape to man myth definitely has very strong Hindu roots. Hanuman is a great devotee of Lord Rama -- the Hindu monkey god Lord Hanuman. Atheists worship Hanuman the flying monkey god and want to force you and your family by Federal law to worship their monkey god. The Hindu legend of the vanara were ape men as well. This is what atheists want you to believe is "science."
The ape-to-man philosophy was well in place long before the first so-called hominids were discovered. The fossils were deliberately interpreted to fit the monkey man myth.
We didn't evolved from apes. Human evolution is an ancient myth used by tyrants to demoralize people into a cattle like submission. Once people lose the uniqueness of their humanity they become as animals and die just the same. Socialism is just a modern form of ancient slavery and oppression. The ape-man is myth....not science.
We can see how atheists have long admired Hinduism and its religious beliefs:
“The Hindu religion is the only one of the world's great faiths dedicated to the idea that the Cosmos itself undergoes an immense, indeed an infinite, number of deaths and rebirths. It is the only religion in which the time scales correspond to those of modern scientific cosmology." -Carl Sagan
Funny, evolutionists never say anything good about the religion that founded and established modern science. But they love Hinduism, Buddhism and, today, many atheists say great things about Islam as well as the Church of Satan! Interestingly, Sagan's praise for Hindu cosmology was proven wrong.
"Physics tend to be dictated by fad and fashion. There are the gurus who dictate the direction in which new ideas grow. " -Michael Duff
Pictured below are Hindu images of Hanuman the monkey god and the legend of the vanara.
Hanuman the monkey god is still worshiped by Hindus and atheists today. Atheists demand that we believe the same thing.
