|
|
Post by Fiddler on Nov 14, 2024 19:08:58 GMT
Boebert left the hearing without answers but said she "will not relent until we get those answers to the American people."
|
|
|
|
Post by atreyu on Nov 14, 2024 22:27:20 GMT
Boebert left the hearing without answers but said she "will not relent until we get those answers to the American people."
She fits right in with the Trumpers here.
|
|
DaveJavu
Legend
Posts: 4,451
Member is Online
|
Post by DaveJavu on Nov 15, 2024 0:47:17 GMT
Boebert left the hearing without answers but said she "will not relent until we get those answers to the American people."
We've got some imbeciles in politics here but as far as I know nothing of this caliber. |
|
|
|
Post by queshank on Nov 15, 2024 2:29:30 GMT
Boebert left the hearing without answers but said she "will not relent until we get those answers to the American people."
Smear tactics.
First the implication that it's just some ordinary House hearing. When it was literally a hearing with quote unquote UFO experts giving their opinions on UFOs.
Second it suggests that this is some loony right wing talking point.
The theories surrounding aliens in the ocean intensified after the Pentagon announced last year that they were creating the All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office (AARO) to investigate UFO sightings across all America’s federal agencies, and mentioned the transmedium objects. The pentagon also confirmed that a leaked video shot by the U.S. Navy that appeared to show a UFO disappearing into the water, was authentic.
Again. It was a hearing ... on UFOs.
Despite the misleading "framing" of the propaganda outlet Fiddler used as a source.
Wednesday's hearing, titled "Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena: Exposing the Truth," featured four experts who said the U.S. government and the Pentagon should be more transparent about UFO sightings and research.
Isn't that weird she'd ask about UFOs in a hearing about UFOs?
What a weirdo amirite fellas?
Queshank
|
|
RWB
Legend
Posts: 12,781
|
Post by RWB on Nov 15, 2024 5:28:00 GMT
Underwater space Aliens 👽
Still more believable than corrupt senile joe biden getting 80 million votes in the 2020 election 🙄
|
|
RWB
Legend
Posts: 12,781
|
Post by RWB on Nov 15, 2024 5:29:49 GMT
Hahaha low/no IQ Fiddler kicks his own ass AGAIN 🤣 😂 😆 😅 😄 😜
|
|
|
|
Post by HolyMoly on Nov 15, 2024 5:53:23 GMT
|
|
DaveJavu
Legend
Posts: 4,451
Member is Online
|
Post by DaveJavu on Nov 15, 2024 7:16:19 GMT
Boebert left the hearing without answers but said she "will not relent until we get those answers to the American people."
Smear tactics.
First the implication that it's just some ordinary House hearing. When it was literally a hearing with quote unquote UFO experts giving their opinions on UFOs.
Second it suggests that this is some loony right wing talking point.
The theories surrounding aliens in the ocean intensified after the Pentagon announced last year that they were creating the All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office (AARO) to investigate UFO sightings across all America’s federal agencies, and mentioned the transmedium objects. The pentagon also confirmed that a leaked video shot by the U.S. Navy that appeared to show a UFO disappearing into the water, was authentic.
Again. It was a hearing ... on UFOs.
Despite the misleading "framing" of the propaganda outlet Fiddler used as a source.
Wednesday's hearing, titled "Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena: Exposing the Truth," featured four experts who said the U.S. government and the Pentagon should be more transparent about UFO sightings and research.
Isn't that weird she'd ask about UFOs in a hearing about UFOs?
What a weirdo amirite fellas?
Queshank
Yeah, so that makes it all right, idiot?
So, if it was a hearing about flat Earth then it would make it OK if she had said that she believes the Earth is flat!
You'll defend anything won't you, you sycophantic clown.
|
|
|
|
Post by queshank on Nov 15, 2024 16:06:22 GMT
Smear tactics.
First the implication that it's just some ordinary House hearing. When it was literally a hearing with quote unquote UFO experts giving their opinions on UFOs.
Second it suggests that this is some loony right wing talking point.
The theories surrounding aliens in the ocean intensified after the Pentagon announced last year that they were creating the All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office (AARO) to investigate UFO sightings across all America’s federal agencies, and mentioned the transmedium objects. The pentagon also confirmed that a leaked video shot by the U.S. Navy that appeared to show a UFO disappearing into the water, was authentic.
Again. It was a hearing ... on UFOs.
Despite the misleading "framing" of the propaganda outlet Fiddler used as a source.
Wednesday's hearing, titled "Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena: Exposing the Truth," featured four experts who said the U.S. government and the Pentagon should be more transparent about UFO sightings and research.
Isn't that weird she'd ask about UFOs in a hearing about UFOs?
What a weirdo amirite fellas?
Queshank
Yeah, so that makes it all right, idiot?
So, if it was a hearing about flat Earth then it would make it OK if she had said that she believes the Earth is flat!
You'll defend anything won't you, you sycophantic clown.
Do all of the US agencies with expertise on these matters say there is evidence the earth may, in fact, be flat?
This is feeling an awful lot like the dumb, misinformed "Jewish space lasers" attack line of leftists who have no idea what was actually said ... they just did what Fiddler did and read their propaganda and went with it like good little soldiers for the state.
Queshank
|
|
demos
Legend
Posts: 9,199
|
Post by demos on Nov 15, 2024 16:09:51 GMT
Boebert left the hearing without answers but said she "will not relent until we get those answers to the American people."
Are we talking Abyss or Leviathan?
[The later was technically a genetic experiment gone wrong].
|
|
thor
Legend
Posts: 20,440
|
Post by thor on Nov 15, 2024 19:28:29 GMT
Boebert left the hearing without answers but said she "will not relent until we get those answers to the American people."
Are we talking Abyss or Leviathan?
[The later was technically a genetic experiment gone wrong].
The Meg, maybe? |
|
DaveJavu
Legend
Posts: 4,451
Member is Online
|
Post by DaveJavu on Nov 15, 2024 22:27:56 GMT
Yeah, so that makes it all right, idiot? So, if it was a hearing about flat Earth then it would make it OK if she had said that she believes the Earth is flat! You'll defend anything won't you, you sycophantic clown.
Do all of the US agencies with expertise on these matters say there is evidence the earth may, in fact, be flat? This is feeling an awful lot like the dumb, misinformed "Jewish space lasers" attack line of leftists who have no idea what was actually said ... they just did what Fiddler did and read their propaganda and went with it like good little soldiers for the state.
Queshank
The context in some cases doesn't matter, some statements are stupid in and of themselves. This is one of those cases. Besides, I have no respect for the matters you people have "hearings" about. I mean, Reagan consulted astrologers. Seriously. And given what ineffectual imbecile he was, it was likely to decide what kind of cowboy hat he would be wearing that day. Premiers and heads of state from all around the world were appalled by Reagan's stupidity. |
|
|
|
Post by queshank on Nov 15, 2024 23:19:36 GMT
Do all of the US agencies with expertise on these matters say there is evidence the earth may, in fact, be flat? This is feeling an awful lot like the dumb, misinformed "Jewish space lasers" attack line of leftists who have no idea what was actually said ... they just did what Fiddler did and read their propaganda and went with it like good little soldiers for the state.
Queshank
The context in some cases doesn't matter, some statements are stupid in and of themselves. This is one of those cases. Besides, I have no respect for the matters you people have "hearings" about. I mean, Reagan consulted astrologers. Seriously. And given what ineffectual imbecile he was, it was likely to decide what kind of cowboy hat he would be wearing that day. Premiers and heads of state from all around the world were appalled by Reagan's stupidity.
So ... you're arguing that in this case, the context of this being a joint, bipartisan hearing of House committees to discuss the evidence the US govt has found vis a vis UFOs and publicly admitted is real ... doesn't matter.
Got it.
I would argue the subject of UFOs doesn't matter, and I really don't give a shit. But I'm not quite dumb enough to be convinced the context doesn't matter.
Queshank
|
|
DaveJavu
Legend
Posts: 4,451
Member is Online
|
Post by DaveJavu on Nov 15, 2024 23:31:36 GMT
The context in some cases doesn't matter, some statements are stupid in and of themselves. This is one of those cases. Besides, I have no respect for the matters you people have "hearings" about. I mean, Reagan consulted astrologers. Seriously. And given what ineffectual imbecile he was, it was likely to decide what kind of cowboy hat he would be wearing that day. Premiers and heads of state from all around the world were appalled by Reagan's stupidity.
So ... you're arguing that in this case, the context of this being a joint, bipartisan hearing of House committees to discuss the evidence the US govt has found vis a vis UFOs and publicly admitted is real ... doesn't matter.
Got it.
I would argue the subject of UFOs doesn't matter, and I really don't give a shit. But I'm not quite dumb enough to be convinced the context doesn't matter.
Queshank
No, you're even dumber! You're dumb enough to believe that because some governmental agency is taking allegation of UFO sightings seriously that makes people giving testimonies there less stupid. You're dumb enough to miss that I said "in some cases" and not in "in all cases". Is raping a child always evil or do you think "context matters", dumbass?
Sometimes, imbecile, context doesn't matter, it called "Res Ipsa loquitur" and it's used in courts of law, all the time. Look it up, ignoramus.
|
|
|
|
Post by queshank on Nov 15, 2024 23:51:27 GMT
So ... you're arguing that in this case, the context of this being a joint, bipartisan hearing of House committees to discuss the evidence the US govt has found vis a vis UFOs and publicly admitted is real ... doesn't matter.
Got it.
I would argue the subject of UFOs doesn't matter, and I really don't give a shit. But I'm not quite dumb enough to be convinced the context doesn't matter.
Queshank
No, you're even dumber! You're dumb enough to believe that because some governmental agency is taking allegation of UFO sightings seriously that makes people giving testimonies there less stupid. You're dumb enough to miss that I said "in some cases" and not in "in all cases". Is raping a child always evil or do you think "context matters", dumbass?
Sometimes, imbecile, context doesn't matter, it called "Res Ipsa loquitur" and it's used in courts of law, all the time. Look it up, ignoramus.
Good fucking god man.
Leftists can't you even see yourself in this? How disassociated from reality and your countrymen you've allowed yourselves to get to rationalize your hate?
Dave, where the fuck did raping a child come from?
Queshank
|
|
DaveJavu
Legend
Posts: 4,451
Member is Online
|
Post by DaveJavu on Nov 16, 2024 0:43:43 GMT
No, you're even dumber! You're dumb enough to believe that because some governmental agency is taking allegation of UFO sightings seriously that makes people giving testimonies there less stupid. You're dumb enough to miss that I said "in some cases" and not in "in all cases". Is raping a child always evil or do you think "context matters", dumbass? Sometimes, imbecile, context doesn't matter, it called "Res Ipsa loquitur" and it's used in courts of law, all the time. Look it up, ignoramus.
Good fucking god man.
Leftists can't you even see yourself in this? How disassociated from reality and your countrymen you've allowed yourselves to get to rationalize your hate?
Dave, where the fuck did raping a child come from?
Queshank
Are you fucking stupid? I said that sometimes context doesn't matter and I gave one example of that. Are you playing retarded on purpose? In which case "bravo". It looks like the real thing. |
|
|
|
Post by queshank on Nov 16, 2024 0:45:18 GMT
Good fucking god man.
Leftists can't you even see yourself in this? How disassociated from reality and your countrymen you've allowed yourselves to get to rationalize your hate?
Dave, where the fuck did raping a child come from?
Queshank
Are you fucking stupid? I said that sometimes context doesn't matter and I gave one example of that. Are you playing retarded on purpose? In which case "bravo". It looks like the real thing.
Dude.
Look how far you had to go to try to get to a point.
That should be an indicator to you that your point is a bit contrived. Maybe outright bullshit.
But you and the rest of my erstwhile allies on the left have made such a habit of it that you will go as far as you need to to delude yourself you're on the high ground. As if distance from reality is a good substitute.
Queshank
|
|
DaveJavu
Legend
Posts: 4,451
Member is Online
|
Post by DaveJavu on Nov 16, 2024 0:51:14 GMT
Are you fucking stupid? I said that sometimes context doesn't matter and I gave one example of that. Are you playing retarded on purpose? In which case "bravo". It looks like the real thing.
Dude.
Look how far you had to go to try to get to a point.
That should be an indicator to you that your point is a bit contrived. Maybe outright bullshit.
But you and the rest of my erstwhile allies on the left have made such a habit of it that you will go as far as you need to to delude yourself you're on the high ground. As if distance from reality is a good substitute.
Queshank
If it's so contrived then how come that there is an expression in YOUR legal lingo specially made for it? I gave it to you: "Res ipsa loquitur". It precisely means that, IE that context doesn't matter, the act is reprehensible in and of itself. Can't you check it, before making your foregone conclusions? Or is your prejudice against "the left" too embedded in you to fight it? |
|
|
|
Post by queshank on Nov 16, 2024 0:55:47 GMT
Dude.
Look how far you had to go to try to get to a point.
That should be an indicator to you that your point is a bit contrived. Maybe outright bullshit.
But you and the rest of my erstwhile allies on the left have made such a habit of it that you will go as far as you need to to delude yourself you're on the high ground. As if distance from reality is a good substitute.
Queshank
If it's so contrived then how come that there is an expression in YOUR legal lingo specially made for it? I gave it to you: "Res ipsa loquitur". It precisely means that, IE that context doesn't matter, the act is reprehensible in and of itself. Can't you check it, before making your foregone conclusions? Or is your prejudice against "the left" too embedded in you to fight it? There's an expression that more accurately represents your arguments.
Argumentum ad absurdum.
When someone is asking experts for answers on a subject, at a hearing involving that very subject ... and a propagandized smear is created about it ... the context matters.
Queshank
|
|
DaveJavu
Legend
Posts: 4,451
Member is Online
|
Post by DaveJavu on Nov 16, 2024 7:12:27 GMT
If it's so contrived then how come that there is an expression in YOUR legal lingo specially made for it? I gave it to you: "Res ipsa loquitur". It precisely means that, IE that context doesn't matter, the act is reprehensible in and of itself. Can't you check it, before making your foregone conclusions? Or is your prejudice against "the left" too embedded in you to fight it? There's an expression that more accurately represents your arguments.
Argumentum ad absurdum.
When someone is asking experts for answers on a subject, at a hearing involving that very subject ... and a propagandized smear is created about it ... the context matters.
Queshank
That's not what "Argumentum ad absurdum" means. It means proving something by showing that the opposite would lead to an absurdity. Don't you know anything? |
|
