Barack Obama: The Political Genius That Wasn’t

1. **Overly broad generalizations**: The text makes sweeping statements about Obama's actions and influence
without providing concrete evidence or credible sources to support these claims. For example, "Obama's campaign
against gun ownership and internet censorship is a symptom of his true ideology" is a vague statement that could
be applied to any politician.
2. **Unsubstantiated accusations**: The text accuses Obama of promoting "far-left beliefs" without providing any
evidence or context. This type of accusation is often used in conspiracy theories to delegitimize opponents.
3. **Lack of critical thinking**: The text presents a simplistic, binary view of the world, with Obama and Trump
being portrayed as either entirely good or evil. This lack of nuance and critical thinking is characteristic of
many conspiracy theories.
4. **Emotional appeals over facts**: The text relies heavily on emotional language and appeals to sentiment (e.g.,
"division and racial strife") rather than presenting factual evidence or analysis.
5. **Uncritical acceptance of sources**: The text cites social media posts and news articles without evaluating
their credibility or sources. This can lead to the spread of misinformation and conspiracy theories.
6. ** cherry-picking information**: The text selectively presents information that supports its narrative while
ignoring or downplaying contradictory evidence.
7. **Inflationary language**: The text uses loaded language, such as "savior" and "demagoguery," to describe
Trump's policies and actions. This type of language is often used in conspiracy theories to create a sense of
urgency or moral panic.
8. **Absence of alternative perspectives**: The text presents only one side of the argument, without acknowledging
or engaging with opposing viewpoints or counterarguments.

These factors suggest that the text may be influenced by conspiracy thinking patterns, such as:

* Confirmation bias: The author appears to selectively seek out information that confirms their pre-existing views
about Obama and Trump.
* Cognitive dissonance: The text creates a sense of discomfort or tension by presenting conflicting information in
a way that is difficult to reconcile with established facts.
* Emotional manipulation: The use of emotive language and appeals to sentiment can be seen as an attempt to
manipulate the reader's emotions rather than engage them in a rational discussion.

Quisling, you cared enough to respond.....