|
|
Post by atreyu on Nov 13, 2024 0:40:43 GMT
Trump expected to try to halt TikTok ban, allies say The president-elect promised to ‘save’ the social media app, which faces a deadline early next year to find a non-China-based owner.
It's going to be fun watching the leopard eat their faces for the next year. I just wish it didn't hurt real people.
|
|
petep
Legend
Posts: 25,957
|
Post by petep on Nov 13, 2024 22:20:12 GMT
Trump expected to try to halt TikTok ban, allies say The president-elect promised to ‘save’ the social media app, which faces a deadline early next year to find a non-China-based owner.
It's going to be fun watching the leopard eat their faces for the next year. I just wish it didn't hurt real people.
I’d be against banning. Unless it’s a proven security threat. We are past the Biden Harris disinformation governance boards. |
|
|
|
Post by freonbale on Nov 13, 2024 22:48:27 GMT
Trump expected to try to halt TikTok ban, allies say The president-elect promised to ‘save’ the social media app, which faces a deadline early next year to find a non-China-based owner.
It's going to be fun watching the leopard eat their faces for the next year. I just wish it didn't hurt real people.
I’d be against banning. Unless it’s a proven security threat. We are past the Biden Harris disinformation governance boards. Yes, to be replaced by embracing total disinformation. If the one side is bad, as you say, why not the other extreme? Do you truly see no threat in complete freedom to be deceived by any company, organization or government? I would advocate a balance, recognizing the harm in both extremes, but you only seem to see a problem on the one. Which makes sense, considering the fictional conspiracies you see as truth. Freon |
|
petep
Legend
Posts: 25,957
|
Post by petep on Nov 14, 2024 4:37:57 GMT
I’d be against banning. Unless it’s a proven security threat. We are past the Biden Harris disinformation governance boards. Yes, to be replaced by embracing total disinformation. If the one side is bad, as you say, why not the other extreme? Do you truly see no threat in complete freedom to be deceived by any company, organization or government? I would advocate a balance, recognizing the harm in both extremes, but you only seem to see a problem on the one. Which makes sense, considering the fictional conspiracies you see as truth. Freon Freon. Find another forum. Ur an idiot. You’ve been wrong at every turn. |
|
RWB
Legend
Posts: 12,761
|
Post by RWB on Nov 14, 2024 5:05:05 GMT
Yes, to be replaced by embracing total disinformation. If the one side is bad, as you say, why not the other extreme? Do you truly see no threat in complete freedom to be deceived by any company, organization or government? I would advocate a balance, recognizing the harm in both extremes, but you only seem to see a problem on the one. Which makes sense, considering the fictional conspiracies you see as truth. Freon Freon. Find another forum. Ur an idiot. You’ve been wrong at every turn. I think this is the only forum that allows him to get away with his lies and propaganda 🙄 |
|
|
|
Post by freonbale on Nov 14, 2024 14:51:49 GMT
Yes, to be replaced by embracing total disinformation. If the one side is bad, as you say, why not the other extreme? Do you truly see no threat in complete freedom to be deceived by any company, organization or government? I would advocate a balance, recognizing the harm in both extremes, but you only seem to see a problem on the one. Which makes sense, considering the fictional conspiracies you see as truth. Freon Freon. Find another forum. Ur an idiot. You’ve been wrong at every turn. Interesting. Are you actually suggesting I leave? Freon |
|
