freonbale
Legend
Stop telling me I'm awesome. I already know.
Posts: 19,780
|
Post by freonbale on Apr 22, 2024 22:37:26 GMT
Every part of what you just said is inaccurate. Rittenhouse was told to stay away from the area by police. He didn't. He not only ignored them, he came heavily armed. He WANTED violence, and came prepared to inflict it. He then directly interacted with the rioters, furthering the possibility of violence, and when they responded, it was enough justification for him to defend himself with lethal violence. A person who SEEKS violent situations, prepares for them, engages with them, and is willing to kill, is not a civilized society member. You may disagree, but his life of zero opportunities will vindicate that most of us do not. As to the rioters being my favorite group, I've repeatedly said rioting is illegal, and those doing it should be held accountable. Not sure how that can be interpreted more than one way. Violence is not an acceptable tool to be used to achieve political, and/or civil, goals. I say let law enforcement do their jobs. That's why we train them and pay them. And if they screw up, we can do something about it through retraining, firing, or any number of solutions. But when a citizen decides to be a vigilante, there is no means of retraining them, or firing them. They make the country LESS safe, by acting on their own, and every law enforcement group in the nation agrees with that. They are in the way. The purpose of the 2nd amendment, by so many of you righties, is purely to defend against tyranny, and no tyranny was happening that day. Rittenhouse wanted to play guns, for real. And he did. Freon This just goes to show why your views on guns are so distorted. Being armed doesn't mean you want violence when you carry for self defense, it means you are prepared for violence if it comes. You are just another left wing anti-gun person who doesn't care to understand at all. Worse, you are here defending these riots as the status quo, and expect everyone to just live their lives as if they must hide from them and ignore them as they destroy property and harm people. Which is exactly why I accurately say you are a coward who would just stand there and watch a woman get raped. No, this goes to show you will say ANYTHING to fit what you don't understand into your worldview. I am FOR the second amendment, always have been. Americans have a right to bear arms, and I would never change that. What I said was that YOU RIGHTIES IN HERE, for years, have told us that your guns are for fighting tyranny, for keeping the government in check, and for defending your property. NONE of that happened here. Rittenhouse is a violence junky, who has guns so he can feel like his dick is above average in size. Turns out it's a pencil dick, just like yours. I wonder what kind of tramp would consent to marry and reproduce with a violent person like that? Freon
|
|
thor
Legend
Posts: 17,608
|
Post by thor on Apr 22, 2024 23:05:45 GMT
You demonstrate every day that you should turn your weapons in, Jar-Jar. You are a danger to yourself, and more importantly, others. No surprise you would turn up to defend women getting raped. There you go again...publicly playing with yourself over thoughts of being a 'hero'. You are now on record about hoping for women to be sexually abused...or worse...so that you can act out your fantasy. You are a complete degenerate, Jar-Jar.
|
|
petep
Legend
Posts: 23,419
|
Post by petep on Apr 22, 2024 23:11:51 GMT
No surprise you would turn up to defend women getting raped. There you go again...publicly playing with yourself over thoughts of being a 'hero'. You are now on record about hoping for women to be sexually abused...or worse...so that you can act out your fantasy. You are a complete degenerate, Jar-Jar. Let me guess. She should have called 911
|
|
Odysseus
Legend
Trump=Chump
Posts: 39,224
|
Post by Odysseus on Apr 22, 2024 23:13:24 GMT
"Turns out it's a pencil dick, just like yours."
LOL
|
|
thor
Legend
Posts: 17,608
|
Post by thor on Apr 22, 2024 23:25:20 GMT
There you go again...publicly playing with yourself over thoughts of being a 'hero'. You are now on record about hoping for women to be sexually abused...or worse...so that you can act out your fantasy. You are a complete degenerate, Jar-Jar. Let me guess. She should have called 911 PP joins the ranks of degeneracy.....
|
|
petep
Legend
Posts: 23,419
|
Post by petep on Apr 22, 2024 23:26:11 GMT
Let me guess. She should have called 911 PP joins the ranks of degeneracy..... I’m sorry. She should have succumbed. Who knows what his childhood was like.
|
|
|
Post by thecitizen on Apr 22, 2024 23:37:34 GMT
#1 the protest March was not violent #2 they were trying to be heroes by taking down a thug with an AR15 yes, they did a stupid thing, but they were still victims of a middle school drop out thug that is your hero The allegedly non-violent perverts in the march/riot were the one that attacked the bystander with the AR15. Pervert loving liberals love to lie about Rittenhouse because he dared to not be defenseless during their riot.
That's really why Rittenhouse was attacked....he dared to not cower before the leftist filth in that "march" and it pissed them off. THEY attacked HIM, remember?
No, they were trying to be heroes by taking an AR from someone they thought to be dangerous
|
|
thor
Legend
Posts: 17,608
|
Post by thor on Apr 22, 2024 23:39:22 GMT
PP joins the ranks of degeneracy..... I’m sorry. She should have succumbed. Who knows what his childhood was like. Fifty-one seconds....you are such my bitch. PP = hoping for women to be sexually abused, or worse, so he can be a 'hero'
|
|
|
Post by Monster Man on Apr 23, 2024 0:05:25 GMT
This just goes to show why your views on guns are so distorted. Being armed doesn't mean you want violence when you carry for self defense, it means you are prepared for violence if it comes. You are just another left wing anti-gun person who doesn't care to understand at all. Worse, you are here defending these riots as the status quo, and expect everyone to just live their lives as if they must hide from them and ignore them as they destroy property and harm people. Which is exactly why I accurately say you are a coward who would just stand there and watch a woman get raped. No, this goes to show you will say ANYTHING to fit what you don't understand into your worldview. I am FOR the second amendment, always have been. Americans have a right to bear arms, and I would never change that. What I said was that YOU RIGHTIES IN HERE, for years, have told us that your guns are for fighting tyranny, for keeping the government in check, and for defending your property. NONE of that happened here. Rittenhouse is a violence junky, who has guns so he can feel like his dick is above average in size. Turns out it's a pencil dick, just like yours. I wonder what kind of tramp would consent to marry and reproduce with a violent person like that? Freon Arguing against your right wing strawman again... anything to avoid answering for your standing there and watching a woman get raped.
|
|
|
Post by Monster Man on Apr 23, 2024 0:06:07 GMT
The allegedly non-violent perverts in the march/riot were the one that attacked the bystander with the AR15. Pervert loving liberals love to lie about Rittenhouse because he dared to not be defenseless during their riot.
That's really why Rittenhouse was attacked....he dared to not cower before the leftist filth in that "march" and it pissed them off. THEY attacked HIM, remember?
No, they were trying to be heroes by taking an AR from someone they thought to be dangerous That was not Rosenbaum.
|
|
|
Post by Monster Man on Apr 23, 2024 0:07:24 GMT
No surprise you would turn up to defend women getting raped. There you go again...publicly playing with yourself over thoughts of being a 'hero'. You are now on record about hoping for women to be sexually abused...or worse...so that you can act out your fantasy. You are a complete degenerate, Jar-Jar. You spend an awful lot of your time thinking about me sexually... Ewww Also, yes, guilty as charged. I would intervene to protect a woman getting raped while you did nothing and watched it happen.
|
|
freonbale
Legend
Stop telling me I'm awesome. I already know.
Posts: 19,780
|
Post by freonbale on Apr 23, 2024 0:08:29 GMT
No, this goes to show you will say ANYTHING to fit what you don't understand into your worldview. I am FOR the second amendment, always have been. Americans have a right to bear arms, and I would never change that. What I said was that YOU RIGHTIES IN HERE, for years, have told us that your guns are for fighting tyranny, for keeping the government in check, and for defending your property. NONE of that happened here. Rittenhouse is a violence junky, who has guns so he can feel like his dick is above average in size. Turns out it's a pencil dick, just like yours. I wonder what kind of tramp would consent to marry and reproduce with a violent person like that? Freon Arguing against your right wing strawman again... anything to avoid answering for your standing there and watching a woman get raped. All you are telling me is that a person like you cannot be reasoned with. You are incapable of rational thought, and will twist whatever you hear into some negative fantasy that conforms to the fictional worldview implanted by your news sources and religion. In short, you are a waste of a human, someone who purely leeches off this country, and offers nothing in return. Freon
|
|
|
Post by thecitizen on Apr 23, 2024 0:26:46 GMT
No, they were trying to be heroes by taking an AR from someone they thought to be dangerous That was not Rosenbaum. Then who was it?
|
|
petep
Legend
Posts: 23,419
|
Post by petep on Apr 23, 2024 0:28:02 GMT
I’m sorry. She should have succumbed. Who knows what his childhood was like. Fifty-one seconds....you are such my bitch. PP = hoping for women to be sexually abused, or worse, so he can be a 'hero' He took the bait. We all see who wads heroes are.
|
|
Paleocon
Legend
We spent 50 Years fighting the USSR just to become a gay, retarded version of It.
Posts: 6,286
|
Post by Paleocon on Apr 23, 2024 0:29:47 GMT
Science says otherwise and every abortion destroys a human being, not a "clump of cells" (that is the same kind of dehumanization that the Nazis used against those they called "untermenchen").
The human heart is one of the first organs to form and function during embryogenesis. By the end of gestational week 3, passive oxygen diffusion becomes insufficient to support metabolism of the developing embryo, and thus the fetal heart becomes vital for oxygen and nutrient distribution.
The initiation of the first heart beat via the primitive heart tube begins at gestational day 22, followed by active fetal blood circulation by the end of week 4.
A "clump of cells" has no heartbeat, but a growing human being does. The unborn child's heartbeat can be detected in as little as 16 days.
If death occurs when a heart stops beating, isn't it life when a heart starts beating?
A heartbeat may be some symbolic moment for you, but it's just a muscle to me. A pump. It holds no special meaning, any more than skeletal or smooth muscle would. The brain is what is important to me, because it alone, holds our consciousness. And a clump of cells with beating heart muscle does not constitute a brain. Learn physiology, bub, you sound like an emotional Karen. Freon If science is the measure, you lose. So, you arbitrarily dismiss the heart, but it's drumbeat debunks the lie that an unborn child is ever just a "clump of cells". As far as the brain, do you think an infant right after birth is an instant genius? Do you think that "consciousness" is fully formed at birth? Of course not! Yet we consider that infant with little or no consciousness of being alive to be a human being because that child IS a human being. Rather than erring on the side of the sanctity of life, you've picked an arbitrary, non-scientific emotional point to declare where humanity starts.
That's no different than the arbitrary, non-scientific emotional point where the Nazis decided that Jews were subhuman
We know that the child's consciousness will improve as he/she grows and matures, so we protect that child for the value of that future consciousness. It's disgusting and evil to pick a point where we decide that child is not valuable enough to gain a greater consciousness so let's kill it so that dear ole' mom can get a latte with her friends later.
|
|
petep
Legend
Posts: 23,419
|
Post by petep on Apr 23, 2024 0:31:49 GMT
A heartbeat may be some symbolic moment for you, but it's just a muscle to me. A pump. It holds no special meaning, any more than skeletal or smooth muscle would. The brain is what is important to me, because it alone, holds our consciousness. And a clump of cells with beating heart muscle does not constitute a brain. Learn physiology, bub, you sound like an emotional Karen. Freon If science is the measure, you lose. So, you arbitrarily dismiss the heart, but it's drumbeat debunks the lie that an unborn child is ever just a "clump of cells". As far as the brain, do you think an infant right after birth is an instant genius? Do you think that "consciousness" is fully formed at birth? Of course not! Yet we consider that infant with little or no consciousness of being alive to be a human being because that child IS a human being. Rather than erring on the side of the sanctity of life, you've picked an arbitrary, non-scientific emotional point to declare where humanity starts.
That's no different than the arbitrary, non-scientific emotional point where the Nazis decided that Jews were subhuman
We know that the child's consciousness will improve as he/she grows and matures, so we protect that child for the value of that future consciousness. It's disgusting and evil to pick a point where we decide that child is not valuable enough to gain a greater consciousness so let's kill it so that dear ole' mom can get a latte with her friends later.
The moron Freon made a claim in another thread about “all these women…” I asked him for supporting source data. Crickets. He ran away again.
|
|
Paleocon
Legend
We spent 50 Years fighting the USSR just to become a gay, retarded version of It.
Posts: 6,286
|
Post by Paleocon on Apr 23, 2024 0:37:59 GMT
The allegedly non-violent perverts in the march/riot were the one that attacked the bystander with the AR15. Pervert loving liberals love to lie about Rittenhouse because he dared to not be defenseless during their riot.
That's really why Rittenhouse was attacked....he dared to not cower before the leftist filth in that "march" and it pissed them off. THEY attacked HIM, remember?
No, they were trying to be heroes by taking an AR from someone they thought to be dangerous So those perverted thugs that started chasing Rittenhouse became brutally dangerous to try to prevent someone else from looking "dangerous" to them.
You are singularly the most stupid poster I've ever encountered on any forum. Those leftist rioters weren't trying to reduce a danger, they were going to try to teach Rittenhouse a lesson for daring to stand against them. It was liberal narcissism so extreme that it transformed into violence, which is the hallmark of the left today.
Rittenhouse was and is a hero because he stood against those who would deny us the right to stand for what we believe in.
The attack on Rittenhouse was a violent form of extreme intolerance.
|
|
Paleocon
Legend
We spent 50 Years fighting the USSR just to become a gay, retarded version of It.
Posts: 6,286
|
Post by Paleocon on Apr 23, 2024 0:38:56 GMT
If science is the measure, you lose. So, you arbitrarily dismiss the heart, but it's drumbeat debunks the lie that an unborn child is ever just a "clump of cells". As far as the brain, do you think an infant right after birth is an instant genius? Do you think that "consciousness" is fully formed at birth? Of course not! Yet we consider that infant with little or no consciousness of being alive to be a human being because that child IS a human being. Rather than erring on the side of the sanctity of life, you've picked an arbitrary, non-scientific emotional point to declare where humanity starts.
That's no different than the arbitrary, non-scientific emotional point where the Nazis decided that Jews were subhuman
We know that the child's consciousness will improve as he/she grows and matures, so we protect that child for the value of that future consciousness. It's disgusting and evil to pick a point where we decide that child is not valuable enough to gain a greater consciousness so let's kill it so that dear ole' mom can get a latte with her friends later.
The moron Freon made a claim in another thread about “all these women…” I asked him for supporting source data. Crickets. He ran away again. He always runs away, squeaking of his vast superiority and he disappears in the distance.
|
|
petep
Legend
Posts: 23,419
|
Post by petep on Apr 23, 2024 0:40:32 GMT
The moron Freon made a claim in another thread about “all these women…” I asked him for supporting source data. Crickets. He ran away again. He always runs away, squeaking of his vast superiority and he disappears in the distance. He’d be a psychiatrists wet dream. I think he actually believes most everything he writes.
|
|
thor
Legend
Posts: 17,608
|
Post by thor on Apr 23, 2024 0:58:49 GMT
If science is the measure, you lose. So, you arbitrarily dismiss the heart, but it's drumbeat debunks the lie that an unborn child is ever just a "clump of cells". As far as the brain, do you think an infant right after birth is an instant genius? Do you think that "consciousness" is fully formed at birth? Of course not! Yet we consider that infant with little or no consciousness of being alive to be a human being because that child IS a human being. Rather than erring on the side of the sanctity of life, you've picked an arbitrary, non-scientific emotional point to declare where humanity starts.
That's no different than the arbitrary, non-scientific emotional point where the Nazis decided that Jews were subhuman
We know that the child's consciousness will improve as he/she grows and matures, so we protect that child for the value of that future consciousness. It's disgusting and evil to pick a point where we decide that child is not valuable enough to gain a greater consciousness so let's kill it so that dear ole' mom can get a latte with her friends later.
The moron Freon made a claim in another thread about “all these women…” I asked him for supporting source data. Crickets. He ran away again. You got your ass kicked. By me citing the evidence you wanted. And YOU ran away, PP. Don't lie, PP.
|
|