Paleocon
Legend
We spent 50 Years fighting the USSR just to become a gay, retarded version of It.
Posts: 6,219
|
Post by Paleocon on Feb 25, 2024 15:38:07 GMT
Of course they are perverted racist animals, based on their behavior. All who tear down those statues and memorials are disgusting filth, beholden to the race pimps. But you can't dare be honest about those things, can you? You have to toe the leftist line and conform.
Still a conformist, no matter what the topic is, aren't you? If the animals do it to revered statuary, it must be right because it's leftists committing the vandalism. Typical wingnut hyperbole--perverted racist animals beholden to race pimps. What. Racists tearing down a statue to white supremacy? How does that work. I guess everyone's a conformist since everyone conforms to one view or another. Revered by neo-Confederates. Not one of those statues were memorials to white supremacy, but you have to tell yourself that perverted lie so that you don't have to face that those removing the statues are perverted racist animals and whores to conformity.
That kind of mob intolerance is Orwellian in that only one viewpoint is permitted.
|
|
Paleocon
Legend
We spent 50 Years fighting the USSR just to become a gay, retarded version of It.
Posts: 6,219
|
Post by Paleocon on Feb 25, 2024 15:40:44 GMT
Twink, I've never taken MLK day off and never will. And those holidays are forced because I'm paying for the f*cking day off for thousands of government parasites who get paid to celebrate a plagiarist with disgusting sexual proclivities, including chuckling while a buddy raped someone.
You can keep lying but that just makes you a bigger pussy than you already are, boy. You should realize that you and your ilk who hate the truth and love to celebrate skin color are the actual racists, not us.
Now, go away, boy, you bother me. I missed that gem. Paleo the Soy Boy worships statues of parasites, yet calls gainfully employed citizens 'parasites'. Gainfully employed? Blood sucking bureaucrats paid by our hard work, not for anything productive that they do themselves.
Just stick to your cock fetish and leave the thinking to us, boy.
|
|
thor
Legend
Posts: 17,428
|
Post by thor on Feb 25, 2024 17:46:16 GMT
Paleo - surrendering harder than Lee at Appomattox. No, just showing the forum what kind disgusting vermin you really are, but I think that they've figured that out already. Degenerate worshiper of a failed state founded to preserve and expand the practice of human trafficking for fun and profit sez wut?
|
|
thor
Legend
Posts: 17,428
|
Post by thor on Feb 25, 2024 17:46:59 GMT
I missed that gem. Paleo the Soy Boy worships statues of parasites, yet calls gainfully employed citizens 'parasites'. Gainfully employed? Blood sucking bureaucrats paid by our hard work, not for anything productive that they do themselves.
Just stick to your cock fetish and leave the thinking to us, boy.
Oooooooooooooooooooooo. Stung your bitch-ass again! Soy Boy, you will never be able to compete - you don't have the talent.
|
|
|
Post by HolyMoly on Feb 25, 2024 23:10:32 GMT
Typical wingnut hyperbole--perverted racist animals beholden to race pimps. What. Racists tearing down a statue to white supremacy? How does that work. I guess everyone's a conformist since everyone conforms to one view or another. Revered by neo-Confederates. Not one of those statues were memorials to white supremacy, but you have to tell yourself that perverted lie so that you don't have to face that those removing the statues are perverted racist animals and whores to conformity.
That kind of mob intolerance is Orwellian in that only one viewpoint is permitted.
Sure they were, that's why so many date from the Jim Crow era--just a reminder that whitey was still in charge, even though he lost the war. Not even white supremacists were dense enough to actually put it on the monument. Was it mob intolerance when statues of King George III were pulled down by the colonists? That was only one viewpoint permitted too.
|
|
Odysseus
Legend
Trump=Chump
Posts: 39,090
|
Post by Odysseus on Feb 26, 2024 3:08:11 GMT
Paleo - surrendering harder than Lee at Appomattox. No, just showing the forum what kind disgusting vermin you really are, but I think that they've figured that out already.
That could be your autobiography...
|
|
Paleocon
Legend
We spent 50 Years fighting the USSR just to become a gay, retarded version of It.
Posts: 6,219
|
Post by Paleocon on Feb 26, 2024 15:03:22 GMT
Not one of those statues were memorials to white supremacy, but you have to tell yourself that perverted lie so that you don't have to face that those removing the statues are perverted racist animals and whores to conformity.
That kind of mob intolerance is Orwellian in that only one viewpoint is permitted.
Sure they were, that's why so many date from the Jim Crow era--just a reminder that whitey was still in charge, even though he lost the war. Not even white supremacists were dense enough to actually put it on the monument. Was it mob intolerance when statues of King George III were pulled down by the colonists? That was only one viewpoint permitted too. That's a lie that only stupid people believe, which certainly explains why you swallowed it whole without gagging. Those statues date from that era because the elderly Confederate heroes were being honored just as we honor our old veterans today, nothing more
Not a single monument mentioned blacks or slavery or segregation or "whitey still in charge", so assuming any of them were about race at all makes YOU the racist here.
You've demonstrated how stupid you are about history, but you're getting ridiculous. The statue was pulled down....what for it....IN THE MIDDLE OF A WAR AGAINST KING GEORGE III!
And what was it pulled down for? Melted down to make bullets for the Continental Army.
By the way, there are statues today in the UK to both William Wallace and Oliver Cromwell, well known rebels against the Crown, but revered for their bravery and the righteousness of their causes.
|
|
Paleocon
Legend
We spent 50 Years fighting the USSR just to become a gay, retarded version of It.
Posts: 6,219
|
Post by Paleocon on Feb 26, 2024 15:06:11 GMT
No, just showing the forum what kind disgusting vermin you really are, but I think that they've figured that out already. Degenerate worshiper of a failed state founded to preserve and expand the practice of human trafficking for fun and profit sez wut? "Sez wut"? Is Ebonics your first language, twink? No, I was completely silent as I kicked your stupid ass all over this forum again.
|
|
|
Post by archie on Feb 26, 2024 16:01:01 GMT
There's another person who finds the comparison of Trump to Navalny totally absurd, Navalny himself. In a letter sent to a friend, a photographer named Evgeny Feldman, Navalny said former President Donald Trump's agenda for a second term was "really scary," according to the Times. He said if President Joe Biden were to have a health issue, "Trump will become president," adding: "Doesn't this obvious thing concern the Democrats?"
The only way for Trump to become president if Biden has a health issue, would be if Trump were to be Biden's running mate (VP).
That seems very unlikely.
Kamala Harris seems good enough. And I really don't think Joe Biden will have a health issue if he is elected to a second term.
I see a below 50 IQ here. Kamala Harris seems good enough. And I really don't think Joe Biden will have a health issue if he is elected to a second term. Your wooden horse is not going to work this time Odysseus.
|
|
|
Post by archie on Feb 26, 2024 16:08:35 GMT
Navalny
Democrat wishful thinking for President Trump.
|
|
thor
Legend
Posts: 17,428
|
Post by thor on Feb 26, 2024 21:02:13 GMT
Degenerate worshiper of a failed state founded to preserve and expand the practice of human trafficking for fun and profit sez wut? "Sez wut"? Is Ebonics your first language, twink? No, I was completely silent as I kicked your stupid ass all over this forum again. What's wrong with Ebonics, Cuck?
|
|
|
Post by queshank on Feb 26, 2024 21:04:38 GMT
LOL, yeah...look at the trouble Russia has with the world's economic refugees flooding their border. Everyone wants to get to Russia so they can work and send money home.
America. King of the 3rd World Countries.
Remember that Mojo?
My mother has a bladder infection. Had a fever past two days. Doctor made the decision to put her on a low grade liquid antibiotic. (She can't take pills. Chews them, is repulsed by the flavor, spits them out.)
Went to pick up the prescription. It's gonna take a while. Dr has to sign extra paperwork for medicare and supplemental insurance to approve it. If we want to pay cash, in case insurance denies it ... $1500 bucks.
America. King of the 3rd World Countries.
Queshank
Great news! The pharmacy just called. The insurance companies came through! They're gonna pick up $730 dollars of the expense.
We just have to come up with the other $930.
I wonder if a death panel made the decision?
America! What a country!
Queshank
|
|
|
Post by queshank on Feb 26, 2024 21:06:41 GMT
PRAISE JESUS FOR THE AFFORDABLE CARE ACT!
|
|
Paleocon
Legend
We spent 50 Years fighting the USSR just to become a gay, retarded version of It.
Posts: 6,219
|
Post by Paleocon on Feb 26, 2024 21:40:45 GMT
"Sez wut"? Is Ebonics your first language, twink? No, I was completely silent as I kicked your stupid ass all over this forum again. What's wrong with Ebonics, Cuck?
|
|
|
Post by HolyMoly on Feb 26, 2024 22:26:25 GMT
Sure they were, that's why so many date from the Jim Crow era--just a reminder that whitey was still in charge, even though he lost the war. Not even white supremacists were dense enough to actually put it on the monument. Was it mob intolerance when statues of King George III were pulled down by the colonists? That was only one viewpoint permitted too. That's a lie that only stupid people believe, which certainly explains why you swallowed it whole without gagging. Those statues date from that era because the elderly Confederate heroes were being honored just as we honor our old veterans today, nothing more
Not a single monument mentioned blacks or slavery or segregation or "whitey still in charge", so assuming any of them were about race at all makes YOU the racist here.
You've demonstrated how stupid you are about history, but you're getting ridiculous. The statue was pulled down....what for it....IN THE MIDDLE OF A WAR AGAINST KING GEORGE III!
And what was it pulled down for? Melted down to make bullets for the Continental Army.
By the way, there are statues today in the UK to both William Wallace and Oliver Cromwell, well known rebels against the Crown, but revered for their bravery and the righteousness of their causes.
Not even close and no cigar. They waited 90 years or so to honor veterans? That's when the final boost in building Confederate monuments occurred, just when the civil rights movement was picking up steam. Of course they didn't mention slavery or segregation, they weren't that stupid.: "The pursuit of white cultural unity through Confederate commemoration went hand-in-hand with the promotion of white supremacy. The Confederate monuments themselves were sometimes explicitly linked to the cause of white supremacy by the notables who spoke at their dedication. For instance, at the 1913 dedication of an on-campus monument honoring University of North Carolina students who fought for the Confederacy, white industrialist Julian Carr unambiguously urged his audience to devote themselves to the maintenance of white supremacy with the same vigor that their Confederate ancestors had defended slavery." "During the dedication speech, Carr praised Confederate soldiers not just for their wartime valor but also for their defense “of the Anglo Saxon race during the four years after the war” when “their courage and steadfastness saved the very life of the Anglo Saxon race in the South.” The “four years after the war” was a clear reference to the period in which the Ku Klux Klan, a white paramilitary organization terrorized blacks and white Republicans who threatened the traditional white hierarchy in the state. Then he boasted that “one hundred yards from where we stand” — and within months of Lee’s 1865 surrender — “I horse whipped a negro wench until her skirts hung in shreds because she had maligned and insulted a Southern lady.” "Carr admittedly was uncommonly explicit about conflating Confederate memorialization with white supremacy, but Southern memorials inherently celebrated the slave South and white power along with the heroism of Confederate soldiers." It was pulled down after the reading of the Declaration of Independence in NYC, not in the middle of the war. George III was a tyrant, just like white supremacists. Cromwell was an imperialist killer who doesn't deserve a statue, but if the limeys want a statue that's up to them.
|
|
Paleocon
Legend
We spent 50 Years fighting the USSR just to become a gay, retarded version of It.
Posts: 6,219
|
Post by Paleocon on Feb 27, 2024 0:12:36 GMT
That's a lie that only stupid people believe, which certainly explains why you swallowed it whole without gagging. Those statues date from that era because the elderly Confederate heroes were being honored just as we honor our old veterans today, nothing more
Not a single monument mentioned blacks or slavery or segregation or "whitey still in charge", so assuming any of them were about race at all makes YOU the racist here.
You've demonstrated how stupid you are about history, but you're getting ridiculous. The statue was pulled down....what for it....IN THE MIDDLE OF A WAR AGAINST KING GEORGE III!
And what was it pulled down for? Melted down to make bullets for the Continental Army.
By the way, there are statues today in the UK to both William Wallace and Oliver Cromwell, well known rebels against the Crown, but revered for their bravery and the righteousness of their causes.
Not even close and no cigar. They waited 90 years or so to honor veterans? That's when the final boost in building Confederate monuments occurred, just when the civil rights movement was picking up steam. Of course they didn't mention slavery or segregation, they weren't that stupid.: "The pursuit of white cultural unity through Confederate commemoration went hand-in-hand with the promotion of white supremacy. The Confederate monuments themselves were sometimes explicitly linked to the cause of white supremacy by the notables who spoke at their dedication. For instance, at the 1913 dedication of an on-campus monument honoring University of North Carolina students who fought for the Confederacy, white industrialist Julian Carr unambiguously urged his audience to devote themselves to the maintenance of white supremacy with the same vigor that their Confederate ancestors had defended slavery." "During the dedication speech, Carr praised Confederate soldiers not just for their wartime valor but also for their defense “of the Anglo Saxon race during the four years after the war” when “their courage and steadfastness saved the very life of the Anglo Saxon race in the South.” The “four years after the war” was a clear reference to the period in which the Ku Klux Klan, a white paramilitary organization terrorized blacks and white Republicans who threatened the traditional white hierarchy in the state. Then he boasted that “one hundred yards from where we stand” — and within months of Lee’s 1865 surrender — “I horse whipped a negro wench until her skirts hung in shreds because she had maligned and insulted a Southern lady.” "Carr admittedly was uncommonly explicit about conflating Confederate memorialization with white supremacy, but Southern memorials inherently celebrated the slave South and white power along with the heroism of Confederate soldiers." It was pulled down after the reading of the Declaration of Independence in NYC, not in the middle of the war. George III was a tyrant, just like white supremacists. Cromwell was an imperialist killer who doesn't deserve a statue, but if the limeys want a statue that's up to them. Good golly, how did you get this stupid? Did liberals do this damage to you?
So, rather than the permanent markings on the memorial or the full committee of citizens that DID NOT make the monument about anything but honoring a soldier IN A UNIFORM, idiots like this one concentrate on one paragraph of an invited politician's speech made in minutes on one day.
I imagine that someone must have also farted loudly during that ceremony, so by your retarded logic, that memorial therefore must be forever about the flatulence that occurred that day rather than what the monument being dedicated ACTUALLY says or what is depicted, right? Yes, you DO sound that stupid and worse.
You just make shit up, don't you? What a joke; you pulled the same nonsense on the Fort Sumter thread. You let you imagination run wild like a child. Southerners didn't put anything about slavery or white supremacy on the monuments because the monuments had nothing to do with that and were not about those things at all. But your narrative goes to shit once again if you accept the truth of that fact. Moreover, YOU look like a racist for pretending these statues had anything to do with race at all.
Ninety years? Are you nuts? Ninety years was 1955! The majority of the monuments were built from the 1880s to the 1920s, when many of the old living Confederates were being remembered by their local communities.
When do you think that the Revolutionary War started? The war was ongoing in July 1776! It actually all started in 1775, so that George III statue was torn down during a time of war. And it was melted down for bullets.
Learn your history, dumbass.
Lincoln was the f*cking tyrant, not the Confederates.
And despite your opinion of Cromwell, the statue still stands because the UK has the integrity to realize that sometimes the opposition is right, just as the Confederates were right.
|
|
thor
Legend
Posts: 17,428
|
Post by thor on Feb 27, 2024 1:41:10 GMT
What's wrong with Ebonics, Cuck? So, Cuck....black folks all sound alike to you? PROTIP: We already know you are a racist, Soy Boy. You don't have to keep showing us.
|
|
thor
Legend
Posts: 17,428
|
Post by thor on Feb 27, 2024 1:42:11 GMT
Not even close and no cigar. They waited 90 years or so to honor veterans? That's when the final boost in building Confederate monuments occurred, just when the civil rights movement was picking up steam. Of course they didn't mention slavery or segregation, they weren't that stupid.: "The pursuit of white cultural unity through Confederate commemoration went hand-in-hand with the promotion of white supremacy. The Confederate monuments themselves were sometimes explicitly linked to the cause of white supremacy by the notables who spoke at their dedication. For instance, at the 1913 dedication of an on-campus monument honoring University of North Carolina students who fought for the Confederacy, white industrialist Julian Carr unambiguously urged his audience to devote themselves to the maintenance of white supremacy with the same vigor that their Confederate ancestors had defended slavery." "During the dedication speech, Carr praised Confederate soldiers not just for their wartime valor but also for their defense “of the Anglo Saxon race during the four years after the war” when “their courage and steadfastness saved the very life of the Anglo Saxon race in the South.” The “four years after the war” was a clear reference to the period in which the Ku Klux Klan, a white paramilitary organization terrorized blacks and white Republicans who threatened the traditional white hierarchy in the state. Then he boasted that “one hundred yards from where we stand” — and within months of Lee’s 1865 surrender — “I horse whipped a negro wench until her skirts hung in shreds because she had maligned and insulted a Southern lady.” "Carr admittedly was uncommonly explicit about conflating Confederate memorialization with white supremacy, but Southern memorials inherently celebrated the slave South and white power along with the heroism of Confederate soldiers." It was pulled down after the reading of the Declaration of Independence in NYC, not in the middle of the war. George III was a tyrant, just like white supremacists. Cromwell was an imperialist killer who doesn't deserve a statue, but if the limeys want a statue that's up to them. Good golly, how did you get this stupid? Did liberals do this damage to you?
So, rather than the permanent markings on the memorial or the full committee of citizens that DID NOT make the monument about anything but honoring a soldier IN A UNIFORM, idiots like this one concentrate on one paragraph of an invited politician's speech made in minutes on one day.
I imagine that someone must have also farted loudly during that ceremony, so by your retarded logic, that memorial therefore must be forever about the flatulence that occurred that day rather than what the monument being dedicated ACTUALLY says or what is depicted, right? Yes, you DO sound that stupid and worse.
You just make shit up, don't you? What a joke; you pulled the same nonsense on the Fort Sumter thread. You let you imagination run wild like a child. Southerners didn't put anything about slavery or white supremacy on the monuments because the monuments had nothing to do with that and were not about those things at all. But your narrative goes to shit once again if you accept the truth of that fact. Moreover, YOU look like a racist for pretending these statues had anything to do with race at all.
Ninety years? Are you nuts? Ninety years was 1955! The majority of the monuments were built from the 1880s to the 1920s, when many of the old living Confederates were being remembered by their local communities.
When do you think that the Revolutionary War started? The war was ongoing in July 1776! It actually all started in 1775, so that George III statue was torn down during a time of war. And it was melted down for bullets.
Learn your history, dumbass.
Lincoln was the f*cking tyrant, not the Confederates.
And despite your opinion of Cromwell, the statue still stands because the UK has the integrity to realize that sometimes the opposition is right, just as the Confederates were right.
Holding other humans in bondage is not tyrannical, you retarded fuck?
|
|
thor
Legend
Posts: 17,428
|
Post by thor on Feb 27, 2024 1:43:35 GMT
That's a lie that only stupid people believe, which certainly explains why you swallowed it whole without gagging. Those statues date from that era because the elderly Confederate heroes were being honored just as we honor our old veterans today, nothing more
Not a single monument mentioned blacks or slavery or segregation or "whitey still in charge", so assuming any of them were about race at all makes YOU the racist here.
You've demonstrated how stupid you are about history, but you're getting ridiculous. The statue was pulled down....what for it....IN THE MIDDLE OF A WAR AGAINST KING GEORGE III!
And what was it pulled down for? Melted down to make bullets for the Continental Army.
By the way, there are statues today in the UK to both William Wallace and Oliver Cromwell, well known rebels against the Crown, but revered for their bravery and the righteousness of their causes.
Not even close and no cigar. They waited 90 years or so to honor veterans? That's when the final boost in building Confederate monuments occurred, just when the civil rights movement was picking up steam. Of course they didn't mention slavery or segregation, they weren't that stupid.: "The pursuit of white cultural unity through Confederate commemoration went hand-in-hand with the promotion of white supremacy. The Confederate monuments themselves were sometimes explicitly linked to the cause of white supremacy by the notables who spoke at their dedication. For instance, at the 1913 dedication of an on-campus monument honoring University of North Carolina students who fought for the Confederacy, white industrialist Julian Carr unambiguously urged his audience to devote themselves to the maintenance of white supremacy with the same vigor that their Confederate ancestors had defended slavery." "During the dedication speech, Carr praised Confederate soldiers not just for their wartime valor but also for their defense “of the Anglo Saxon race during the four years after the war” when “their courage and steadfastness saved the very life of the Anglo Saxon race in the South.” The “four years after the war” was a clear reference to the period in which the Ku Klux Klan, a white paramilitary organization terrorized blacks and white Republicans who threatened the traditional white hierarchy in the state. Then he boasted that “one hundred yards from where we stand” — and within months of Lee’s 1865 surrender — “I horse whipped a negro wench until her skirts hung in shreds because she had maligned and insulted a Southern lady.” "Carr admittedly was uncommonly explicit about conflating Confederate memorialization with white supremacy, but Southern memorials inherently celebrated the slave South and white power along with the heroism of Confederate soldiers." It was pulled down after the reading of the Declaration of Independence in NYC, not in the middle of the war. George III was a tyrant, just like white supremacists. Cromwell was an imperialist killer who doesn't deserve a statue, but if the limeys want a statue that's up to them. They named a town after that turd.
|
|
|
Post by HolyMoly on Feb 27, 2024 1:58:02 GMT
Not even close and no cigar. They waited 90 years or so to honor veterans? That's when the final boost in building Confederate monuments occurred, just when the civil rights movement was picking up steam. Of course they didn't mention slavery or segregation, they weren't that stupid.: "The pursuit of white cultural unity through Confederate commemoration went hand-in-hand with the promotion of white supremacy. The Confederate monuments themselves were sometimes explicitly linked to the cause of white supremacy by the notables who spoke at their dedication. For instance, at the 1913 dedication of an on-campus monument honoring University of North Carolina students who fought for the Confederacy, white industrialist Julian Carr unambiguously urged his audience to devote themselves to the maintenance of white supremacy with the same vigor that their Confederate ancestors had defended slavery." "During the dedication speech, Carr praised Confederate soldiers not just for their wartime valor but also for their defense “of the Anglo Saxon race during the four years after the war” when “their courage and steadfastness saved the very life of the Anglo Saxon race in the South.” The “four years after the war” was a clear reference to the period in which the Ku Klux Klan, a white paramilitary organization terrorized blacks and white Republicans who threatened the traditional white hierarchy in the state. Then he boasted that “one hundred yards from where we stand” — and within months of Lee’s 1865 surrender — “I horse whipped a negro wench until her skirts hung in shreds because she had maligned and insulted a Southern lady.” "Carr admittedly was uncommonly explicit about conflating Confederate memorialization with white supremacy, but Southern memorials inherently celebrated the slave South and white power along with the heroism of Confederate soldiers." It was pulled down after the reading of the Declaration of Independence in NYC, not in the middle of the war. George III was a tyrant, just like white supremacists. Cromwell was an imperialist killer who doesn't deserve a statue, but if the limeys want a statue that's up to them. Good golly, how did you get this stupid? Did liberals do this damage to you?
So, rather than the permanent markings on the memorial or the full committee of citizens that DID NOT make the monument about anything but honoring a soldier IN A UNIFORM, idiots like this one concentrate on one paragraph of an invited politician's speech made in minutes on one day.
I imagine that someone must have also farted loudly during that ceremony, so by your retarded logic, that memorial therefore must be forever about the flatulence that occurred that day rather than what the monument being dedicated ACTUALLY says or what is depicted, right? Yes, you DO sound that stupid and worse.
You just make shit up, don't you? What a joke; you pulled the same nonsense on the Fort Sumter thread. You let you imagination run wild like a child. Southerners didn't put anything about slavery or white supremacy on the monuments because the monuments had nothing to do with that and were not about those things at all. But your narrative goes to shit once again if you accept the truth of that fact. Moreover, YOU look like a racist for pretending these statues had anything to do with race at all.
Ninety years? Are you nuts? Ninety years was 1955! The majority of the monuments were built from the 1880s to the 1920s, when many of the old living Confederates were being remembered by their local communities.
When do you think that the Revolutionary War started? The war was ongoing in July 1776! It actually all started in 1775, so that George III statue was torn down during a time of war. And it was melted down for bullets.
Learn your history, dumbass.
Lincoln was the f*cking tyrant, not the Confederates.
And despite your opinion of Cromwell, the statue still stands because the UK has the integrity to realize that sometimes the opposition is right, just as the Confederates were right.
Carr was more of a businessman than a politician and was also a Civil War vet, so he knew what he was talking about. I doubt his remarks about white supremacy were received with boos. Of course they didn't put anything about white supremacy on the monuments, they didn't need to. The message was quite obvious. Nothing made up, this is just what happened. His audience were the racists, not me. There was a resurgence of Confederate monuments and iconography starting in the 1950s, just at the same time civil rights agitation was coming to the fore. Just coincidence, no doubt. 1776 was at the beginning of the war, not the middle. I know my history, which is different from rancid Lost Cause nonsense. Slaveholders were tyrants, not Lincoln. Probably it still stands because limeys don't care that Cromwell was a war criminal, just like Columbus statues still stand here despite the fact he was a mass murderer.
|
|