|
Post by DaveJavu on Jan 15, 2024 22:23:31 GMT
Have you seen it? I am watching season 1.
Not bad, but they made a mistake:
Young Sheldon mentions the Kobayashi Maru, but he shouldn't know about it. "Wrath Of Khan" was released in 1982 and Sheldon (who was born in 1970) was only nine in that season...
Edit: I corrected a mistake...
|
|
|
Post by Mercy for All on Jan 16, 2024 17:55:45 GMT
Good catch. I tried watching it and found most of the characters insufferable. My in-laws love it.
|
|
|
Post by DaveJavu on Jan 16, 2024 22:07:15 GMT
Good catch. I tried watching it and found most of the characters insufferable. My in-laws love it. I've grown to like it but I agree that it's an acquired taste. It helps if you already like The Big Bang Theory, which I do.
|
|
|
Post by Mercy for All on Jan 16, 2024 22:59:41 GMT
Good catch. I tried watching it and found most of the characters insufferable. My in-laws love it. I've grown to like it but I agree that it's an acquired taste. It helps if you already like The Big Bang Theory, which I do. I really liked the first couple of seasons. It was fresh. And there was a high nerd-quotient. Then, for me, it turned into "just another sitcom," with predictable jokes and delivery. But I think the show did a lot to make nerds culturally acceptable.
|
|
|
Post by DaveJavu on Jan 16, 2024 23:02:19 GMT
I've grown to like it but I agree that it's an acquired taste. It helps if you already like The Big Bang Theory, which I do. I really liked the first couple of seasons. It was fresh. And there was a high nerd-quotient. Then, for me, it turned into "just another sitcom," with predictable jokes and delivery. But I think the show did a lot to make nerds culturally acceptable. Just to be clear, which of these two shows are you talking about?
|
|
|
Post by Biggles on Jan 16, 2024 23:24:20 GMT
I really liked the first couple of seasons. It was fresh. And there was a high nerd-quotient. Then, for me, it turned into "just another sitcom," with predictable jokes and delivery. But I think the show did a lot to make nerds culturally acceptable. Just to be clear, which of these two shows are you talking about? I don't recall ever watching "Young Sheldon". I did watch "Big Bang Theory" back when it was new. But not much.
|
|
|
Post by DaveJavu on Jan 16, 2024 23:28:59 GMT
Just to be clear, which of these two shows are you talking about? I don't recall ever watching "Young Sheldon". I did watch "Big Bang Theory" back when it was new. But not much. I am not sure you'll enjoy watching "Young Sheldon" much then...
|
|
|
Post by Biggles on Jan 16, 2024 23:29:59 GMT
I don't recall ever watching "Young Sheldon". I did watch "Big Bang Theory" back when it was new. But not much. I am not sure you'll enjoy watching "Young Sheldon" much then... Probably not. I did google it a bit and... well...
|
|
|
Post by Mercy for All on Jan 17, 2024 2:06:51 GMT
I really liked the first couple of seasons. It was fresh. And there was a high nerd-quotient. Then, for me, it turned into "just another sitcom," with predictable jokes and delivery. But I think the show did a lot to make nerds culturally acceptable. Just to be clear, which of these two shows are you talking about? I liked the first couple of seasons of Big Bang (I even like the BNL theme song). Watched just a couple of episodes of Sheldon.
|
|
|
Post by DaveJavu on Jan 17, 2024 2:37:11 GMT
Just to be clear, which of these two shows are you talking about? I liked the first couple of seasons of Big Bang (I even like the BNL theme song). Watched just a couple of episodes of Sheldon. It's funny because I didn't really like the first seasons of Big Bang. As a matter of fact I watched the whole series in a few weeks years after it was over. I didn't know about it when it was on. So I got used to it after a few seasons only and only liked it then, because (I think) up until them the characters were ill-defined, some of them at least, and Sheldon evolved from one of the five main characters of the series to the undisputed main character thereof. That's only then, I think, that the series reached its maturity. So it seems that you and I had diametrically opposed experiences of the show.
|
|
|
Post by Mercy for All on Jan 17, 2024 2:48:44 GMT
I liked the first couple of seasons of Big Bang (I even like the BNL theme song). Watched just a couple of episodes of Sheldon. It's funny because I didn't really like the first seasons of Big Bang. As a matter of fact I watched the whole series in a few weeks years after it was over. I didn't know about it when it was on. So I got used to it after a few seasons only and only liked it then, because (I think) up until them the characters were ill-defined, some of them at least, and Sheldon evolved from one of the five main characters of the series to the undisputed main character thereof. That's only then, I think, that the series reached its maturity. So it seems that you and I had diametrically opposed experiences of the show. Yeah, the first half of the first season, the characters hadn't settled in yet. My impression is that after the first couple of seasons, the characters became caricatures of themselves. Once you recognize the delivery (e.g., Sheldon's quick intake of breath before he says anything), you can't "unsee it." They're going through the motions. I saw one nerd complain online that the writers were writing "what they thought nerds would say" instead of writing what nerds would say, referring to this scene: It's not a "Lord of the Rings" ring; it's "the one Ring." Probably quibbling, but I get the point
|
|
|
Post by DaveJavu on Jan 17, 2024 22:55:37 GMT
It's funny because I didn't really like the first seasons of Big Bang. As a matter of fact I watched the whole series in a few weeks years after it was over. I didn't know about it when it was on. So I got used to it after a few seasons only and only liked it then, because (I think) up until them the characters were ill-defined, some of them at least, and Sheldon evolved from one of the five main characters of the series to the undisputed main character thereof. That's only then, I think, that the series reached its maturity. So it seems that you and I had diametrically opposed experiences of the show. Yeah, the first half of the first season, the characters hadn't settled in yet. My impression is that after the first couple of seasons, the characters became caricatures of themselves. Once you recognize the delivery (e.g., Sheldon's quick intake of breath before he says anything), you can't "unsee it." They're going through the motions. I saw one nerd complain online that the writers were writing "what they thought nerds would say" instead of writing what nerds would say, referring to this scene: It's not a "Lord of the Rings" ring; it's "the one Ring." Probably quibbling, but I get the point I don’t think I’ll agree with that. They all start basically as clichés and evolve throughout the series, becoming more complex and thus interesting characters. Let’s examine that: Sheldon starts as an autistic genius who is unable to read other people’s emotions, nor express those he feels himself. He ends up an accomplished scientist with a wife with whom he shares his Nobel prize (kind of like Marie Curie and her husband). And he discards the long speech he had prepared and instead thanks his friends without whom he realizes he wouldn’t have gotten there. He evolves seamlessly from the Sheldon at the beginning of the series to the one at the end. That is a remarkable acting job for which Jim Parsons received several awards. Leonard goes from a nerd who’s hopelessly in love with his neighbor who thinks of him as a friend and dates men that are nothing like him to the man she marries. Howard starts as a creepy nerd who lives with his mother and ends up as a happily married father of two kids and someone who’s been in space! Raj from someone who can’t even talk when a girl is within his sight to someone still single but dating pretty women. Penny is kind of an airhead, she’s a penniless (wink) waitress/would be actress who dates handsome losers (often dumb as a stump) and ends up Leonard's wife and a success in her career (since she’s richer than her husband). So you see? There’s more to it than has met your eye.
|
|
|
Post by Mercy for All on Jan 18, 2024 1:30:06 GMT
Yeah, the first half of the first season, the characters hadn't settled in yet. My impression is that after the first couple of seasons, the characters became caricatures of themselves. Once you recognize the delivery (e.g., Sheldon's quick intake of breath before he says anything), you can't "unsee it." They're going through the motions. I saw one nerd complain online that the writers were writing "what they thought nerds would say" instead of writing what nerds would say, referring to this scene: It's not a "Lord of the Rings" ring; it's "the one Ring." Probably quibbling, but I get the point I don’t think I’ll agree with that. They all start basically as clichés and evolve throughout the series, becoming more complex and thus interesting characters. Let’s examine that: Sheldon starts as an autistic genius who is unable to read other people’s emotions, nor express those he feels himself. He ends up an accomplished scientist with a wife with whom he shares his Nobel prize (kind of like Marie Curie and her husband). And he discards the long speech he had prepared and instead thanks his friends without whom he realizes he wouldn’t have gotten there. He evolves seamlessly from the Sheldon at the beginning of the series to the one at the end. That is a remarkable acting job for which Jim Parsons received several awards. Leonard goes from a nerd who’s hopelessly in love with his neighbor who thinks of him as a friend and dates men that are nothing like him to the man she marries. Howard starts as a creepy nerd who lives with his mother and ends up as a happily married father of two kids and someone who’s been in space! Raj from someone who can’t even talk when a girl is within his sight to someone still single but dating pretty women. Penny is kind of an airhead, she’s a penniless (wink) waitress/would be actress who dates handsome losers (often dumb as a stump) and ends up Leonard's wife and a success in her career (since she’s richer than her husband). So you see? There’s more to it than has met your eye. Most of those changes happened after I stopped watching.
|
|
|
Post by DaveJavu on Jan 18, 2024 21:54:54 GMT
I don’t think I’ll agree with that. They all start basically as clichés and evolve throughout the series, becoming more complex and thus interesting characters. Let’s examine that: Sheldon starts as an autistic genius who is unable to read other people’s emotions, nor express those he feels himself. He ends up an accomplished scientist with a wife with whom he shares his Nobel prize (kind of like Marie Curie and her husband). And he discards the long speech he had prepared and instead thanks his friends without whom he realizes he wouldn’t have gotten there. He evolves seamlessly from the Sheldon at the beginning of the series to the one at the end. That is a remarkable acting job for which Jim Parsons received several awards. Leonard goes from a nerd who’s hopelessly in love with his neighbor who thinks of him as a friend and dates men that are nothing like him to the man she marries. Howard starts as a creepy nerd who lives with his mother and ends up as a happily married father of two kids and someone who’s been in space! Raj from someone who can’t even talk when a girl is within his sight to someone still single but dating pretty women. Penny is kind of an airhead, she’s a penniless (wink) waitress/would be actress who dates handsome losers (often dumb as a stump) and ends up Leonard's wife and a success in her career (since she’s richer than her husband). So you see? There’s more to it than has met your eye. Most of those changes happened after I stopped watching. I was almost certain of that, which is why I told you that. Maybe you could give it another try. The show ended with a consequential audience, because Jim Parsons refused to do two more seasons in spite of the fifty million dollars he would have won, had he accepted. Seven of the other actors lost that amount too, but the show couldn't continue without him, so they were a little pissed at him... I don't know if they've forgiven him yet.
|
|
|
Post by Biggles on Jan 19, 2024 1:10:24 GMT
What, if anything, has Jim Parsons done since?
|
|
|
Post by DaveJavu on Jan 19, 2024 22:48:08 GMT
What, if anything, has Jim Parsons done since? According to his bio, plenty, as actor , in films, TV series and on stage, also as a producer , he's won about twenty awards and has been nominated for about twice as many.
|
|
|
Post by Mercy for All on Jan 20, 2024 17:54:07 GMT
What, if anything, has Jim Parsons done since? According to his bio, plenty, as actor , in films, TV series and on stage, also as a producer , he's won about twenty awards and has been nominated for about twice as many. Yeah, there are a lot of options—some people can't get work because they've been type-cast, some choose to spread their creative wings and do other things, and some people want to settle down outside of the limelight. Parsons seems to be doing other things...because he wants to, but has still been doing some acting. www.imdb.com/name/nm1433588/?ref_=nv_sr_srsg_0_tt_0_nm_8_q_jim%2520par
|
|