|
|
Post by stugatze on Aug 24, 2023 16:14:20 GMT
Jonathan Turley: Democrats’ Plan to Block Trump Is ‘Most Dangerous Constitutional Theory I Have Seen in Decades’ George Washington University law professor Jonathan Turley
By: David Hawkins August 23, 2023
George Washington University law professor Jonathan Turley has warned that the Democrats’ plan to block President Donald Trump from getting on the ballot in many states is “the single most dangerous constitutional theory” he has seen.
Democrats are hoping to block Trump using the 14th Amendment.
Turley said: “I think this is the single most dangerous constitutional theory I have seen pop up in decades.
“I mean, this is an argument that under the 14th Amendment, Donald Trump can be barred from running again, ever holding office in the federal government because he violated his oath.” Turley continued by explaining that Democrats are trying to claim that Trump “supported an insurrection or rebellion.” “What was January 6th? “In the view of many citizens, including myself, it was a protest that became a riot,” Turley noted.
“It was not a rebellion or insurrection.
“But that’s a matter of disagreement between citizens.
“But Donald Trump hasn’t been charged with insurrection, not even incitement. “Special Counsel Jack Smith charged him with a variety of crimes like fraud.
“He notably did not charge him with even incitement.”
Last week, Turley warned during an appearance on Fox News that Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis’s indictment of Trump is “dangerous.” He noted that the politically motivated move “essentially criminalizes challenges to elections.” |
|
Greg55_99
Legend
Posts: 22,807 
Member is Online
|
Post by Greg55_99 on Aug 24, 2023 16:27:16 GMT
Really? I thought Trump's attempt to overturn an election he lost was WAY more dangerous. At least the Dems are taking it to the court.
Greg
|
|
|
|
Post by stugatze on Aug 24, 2023 16:36:52 GMT
Really? I thought Trump's attempt to overturn an election he lost was WAY more dangerous. At least the Dems are taking it to the court. Greg
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Greggy, .. STOP IT, he was NOT trying to OVERTURN any damn election. Your filthy liberal news media MASTERS tell you demoncraps that and you WANT to believe such shit, .. and there is NOT a shred of evidence he asked anybody to FIX the election. He asked to help find if there were ANYMORE votes, .. not counted yet,..that is all. 
YOUR political side DID engage in f-ing Voter Fraud and MOST Americans KNOW it,  .. now they DO believe it.
Yeah, .. Greggy, NOBODY really believes that brain dead Biden received 11 million more votes than what Obongo received??  
Biden was NEVER popular and could NOT muster maybe 100 people or so at his political rallies, .. yet, trump received thousands and thousands of supporters EVERYWHERE he went in America! (fact) |
|
Greg55_99
Legend
Posts: 22,807
Member is Online
|
Post by Greg55_99 on Aug 24, 2023 16:47:39 GMT
Really? I thought Trump's attempt to overturn an election he lost was WAY more dangerous. At least the Dems are taking it to the court. Greg
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Greggy, .. STOP IT, he was NOT trying to OVERTURN any damn election. Your filthy liberal news media MASTERS tell you demoncraps that and you WANT to believe such shit, .. and there is NOT a shred of evidence he asked anybody to FIX the election. He asked to help find if there were ANYMORE votes, .. not counted yet,..that is all.
YOUR political side DID engage in f-ing Voter Fraud and MOST Americans KNOW it, .. now they DO believe it.
Yeah, .. Greggy, NOBODY really believes that brain dead Biden received 11 million more votes than what Obongo received??
Biden was NEVER popular and could NOT muster maybe 100 people or so at his political rallies, .. yet, trump received thousands and thousands of supporters EVERYWHERE he went in America! (fact) Sure there's evidence Stuey. That's how the DA got the grand jury to vote out an indictment. She showed them evidence. Did you miss that Stuey baby? Greg |
|
|
|
Post by stugatze on Aug 24, 2023 17:12:13 GMT
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Greggy, .. STOP IT, he was NOT trying to OVERTURN any damn election. Your filthy liberal news media MASTERS tell you demoncraps that and you WANT to believe such shit, .. and there is NOT a shred of evidence he asked anybody to FIX the election. He asked to help find if there were ANYMORE votes, .. not counted yet,..that is all.
YOUR political side DID engage in f-ing Voter Fraud and MOST Americans KNOW it, .. now they DO believe it.
Yeah, .. Greggy, NOBODY really believes that brain dead Biden received 11 million more votes than what Obongo received??
Biden was NEVER popular and could NOT muster maybe 100 people or so at his political rallies, .. yet, trump received thousands and thousands of supporters EVERYWHERE he went in America! (fact) Sure there's evidence Stuey. That's how the DA got the grand jury to vote out an indictment. She showed them evidence. Did you miss that Stuey baby? Greg
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Greggy, It is f-ing HILARIOUS because a Prosecutor CAN indict a f-ing Ham Sandwich on so called, 'evidence', but, it is bullshit.
I have NO illusion though, .. that a CROOKED f-ing leftist Jury picked by an anti-Trump Prosecutor and anti-Trump Judge COULD find Trump guilty on ANY damn thing, but, .. BUT, I also have FAITH that a HIGHER COURT can NOT allow an INNOCENT MAN to be CONVICTED on shit charges, .. especially if the evidence is so damn thin, if at all. 
Greggy, .. in TRUTH, .. MOST of America SEES the Trump persecution for what it REALLY is, .. to TRY to take Trump out of the 2024 Potus race and to HURT him financially and to humiliate him in prison if possible, .. thus, .. keeping the demoncrap liberal socialist party in power, and nothing more. This is NOT about real justice, it is a f-ing sham.
|
|
Greg55_99
Legend
Posts: 22,807
Member is Online
|
Post by Greg55_99 on Aug 24, 2023 17:20:15 GMT
Sure there's evidence Stuey. That's how the DA got the grand jury to vote out an indictment. She showed them evidence. Did you miss that Stuey baby? Greg
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Greggy, It is f-ing HILARIOUS because a Prosecutor CAN indict a f-ing Ham Sandwich on so called, 'evidence', but, it is bullshit.
I have NO illusion though, .. that a CROOKED f-ing leftist Jury picked by an anti-Trump Prosecutor and anti-Trump Judge COULD find Trump guilty on ANY damn thing, but, .. BUT, I also have FAITH that a HIGHER COURT can NOT allow an INNOCENT MAN to be CONVICTED on shit charges, .. especially if the evidence is so damn thin, if at all.
Greggy, .. in TRUTH, .. MOST of America SEES the Trump persecution for what it REALLY is, .. to TRY to take Trump out of the 2024 Potus race and to HURT him financially and to humiliate him in prison if possible, .. thus, .. keeping the demoncrap liberal socialist party in power, and nothing more. This is NOT about real justice, it is a f-ing sham.
 Well, there's your Ham Sandwich Stuey baby. The REAL one will be coming along shortly. I can't wait! Greg |
|
