Post by Deleted on Jul 14, 2022 17:04:49 GMT
is that they're not just attacking the theory of evolution by Darwin in their ranting they're attacking the very foundations of all sciences as well. They say that "macroevolution" (a term that they concocted and makes no sense in real science) doesn't exist and that means that all species existent today (with small variations) have been present from the very beginning of life on Earth. Well, life on Earth has existed for 3.7 billion years!!! So that means that MAN has existed for that long! Can you imagine man existing as a savage with no technical progress at all and no artifact whatsoever or we would have found them, for that long! And no traces of that man subsisted until a minuscule fraction of that time ago! No skeletons, no bones! It's absurd.
What kind of moron wouldn't understand that before you can pretend that say life didn't exist solely on a microscopic level for nearly three billion years you'd have to contradict the entirety of science and nearly all of its representants: Physicists, chemists, astrophysicists, mathematicians... and a plethora of specialists.
Because if you don't contradict these findings then you have to admit that there was a time when life existed and man didn't and so that whatever lifeforms there were then, somehow evolved to become man. You can't have it both ways, it's either one or the other. Either man existed for three billion years (which is insanely idiotic) or man evolved from the primitive life forms that existed then.
So you see whether Darwin specifically was right or wrong about some detail is the least of these bozos' problems even if they are too stupid to realize it.
What kind of moron wouldn't understand that before you can pretend that say life didn't exist solely on a microscopic level for nearly three billion years you'd have to contradict the entirety of science and nearly all of its representants: Physicists, chemists, astrophysicists, mathematicians... and a plethora of specialists.
Because if you don't contradict these findings then you have to admit that there was a time when life existed and man didn't and so that whatever lifeforms there were then, somehow evolved to become man. You can't have it both ways, it's either one or the other. Either man existed for three billion years (which is insanely idiotic) or man evolved from the primitive life forms that existed then.
So you see whether Darwin specifically was right or wrong about some detail is the least of these bozos' problems even if they are too stupid to realize it.
