demos
Legend
Posts: 9,199
|
Post by demos on Apr 22, 2022 16:23:13 GMT
Yeah, imagine that, a terrorist organization before said assassination is still one after... Who could have predicted this. I bet they thought twice before sending their top commanders into US allied territory while plotting on how to harm US forces.Narrator: they did not. Iran-backed militias also launched attacks on U.S. forces and have continued to do so. Nothing was gained by that illegal assassination.
|
|
|
Post by Monster Man on Apr 22, 2022 17:48:06 GMT
Yeah, imagine that, a terrorist organization before said assassination is still one after... Who could have predicted this. I bet they thought twice before sending their top commanders into US allied territory while plotting on how to harm US forces.Narrator: they did not. Iran-backed militias also launched attacks on U.S. forces and have continued to do so. Nothing was gained by that illegal assassination. Yeah, we killed one person. That is net gain.
|
|
demos
Legend
Posts: 9,199
|
Post by demos on Apr 22, 2022 18:27:56 GMT
Yeah, we killed one person. That is net gain. No strategic gain in the region. Did not disrupt Iranian activities. Retaliatory attacks on U.S. troops and other personnel. And is currently hurting attempts to resume the nuclear deal. In the end, all you have is an illegal act with no payoff. Kinda describes a lot of Trump's foreign policy: reactionary acts with no payoff.
|
|
|
Post by Monster Man on Apr 22, 2022 18:40:59 GMT
Yeah, we killed one person. That is net gain. No strategic gain in the region. Did not disrupt Iranian activities. Retaliatory attacks on U.S. troops and other personnel. And is currently hurting attempts to resume the nuclear deal. In the end, all you have is an illegal act with no payoff. Kinda describes a lot of Trump's foreign policy: reactionary acts with no payoff. I don't care about the nuclear deal, it is garbage. These terrorists were attacking us before, they are attacking us after. I am just fine with killing them as we can.
|
|
demos
Legend
Posts: 9,199
|
Post by demos on Apr 22, 2022 18:54:18 GMT
I don't care about the nuclear deal, it is garbage. Except it was doing what it was meant to do, which was keep Iran's nuclear program restrained. Well, we could extricate ourselves from the region and the conflicts we stupidly led ourselves into which put us in these predicaments. That would result in a lot less attacks on U.S. troops and personnel. Not to mention stop abasing ourselves to ungrateful client states who want to use us to do their dirty work. Then Congress can declare war on Iran, according to the Constitution and the rule of law, as opposed to some half-assed illegal operation that doesn't accomplish anything. (Although, if we're being frank, a war with Iran would still be a half-assed operation that wouldn't really accomplish anything).
|
|
demos
Legend
Posts: 9,199
|
Post by demos on Apr 25, 2022 16:22:10 GMT
|
|
demos
Legend
Posts: 9,199
|
Post by demos on Apr 26, 2022 17:52:58 GMT
|
|
bama beau
Legend
Fish will piss anywhere. They just live in water.
Posts: 11,579
|
Post by bama beau on Apr 27, 2022 5:43:05 GMT
Narrator: they did not. Iran-backed militias also launched attacks on U.S. forces and have continued to do so. Nothing was gained by that illegal assassination. Yeah, we killed one person. That is net gain. That is wrong on almost every level. It is immoral, illegal and costly, not just in terms of dollars, but of lives.
|
|
demos
Legend
Posts: 9,199
|
Post by demos on Apr 27, 2022 19:10:37 GMT
|
|
demos
Legend
Posts: 9,199
|
Post by demos on Apr 29, 2022 14:49:44 GMT
|
|
demos
Legend
Posts: 9,199
|
Post by demos on May 4, 2022 15:45:26 GMT
|
|
demos
Legend
Posts: 9,199
|
Post by demos on May 11, 2022 19:02:20 GMT
|
|
bama beau
Legend
Fish will piss anywhere. They just live in water.
Posts: 11,579
|
Post by bama beau on May 12, 2022 5:22:27 GMT
Yeah, we killed one person. That is net gain. No strategic gain in the region. Did not disrupt Iranian activities. Retaliatory attacks on U.S. troops and other personnel. And is currently hurting attempts to resume the nuclear deal. In the end, all you have is an illegal act with no payoff. Kinda describes a lot of Trump's foreign policy: reactionary acts with no payoff. Nice.
|
|
demos
Legend
Posts: 9,199
|
Post by demos on May 18, 2022 16:03:00 GMT
|
|
demos
Legend
Posts: 9,199
|
Post by demos on May 25, 2022 21:07:00 GMT
|
|
demos
Legend
Posts: 9,199
|
Post by demos on Jun 9, 2022 14:42:40 GMT
|
|
demos
Legend
Posts: 9,199
|
Post by demos on Jun 10, 2022 15:13:39 GMT
|
|
demos
Legend
Posts: 9,199
|
Post by demos on Jun 10, 2022 17:49:39 GMT
SourceThis article comes across as arguing for retaliatory strikes for every attack, regardless of that attack's effectiveness. Basically, arguing for escalation and broader conflict with Iran. What's interesting about stories like these is how no one seems to ask: why are we still there (illegally in the case of Syria) and putting our forces in harm's way? And always the obligatory quotes from neocon think tankers (in this case WINEP) - who played a role in leading us into this mess.
|
|
demos
Legend
Posts: 9,199
|
Post by demos on Jun 13, 2022 17:06:05 GMT
|
|
demos
Legend
Posts: 9,199
|
Post by demos on Jun 14, 2022 18:33:32 GMT
|
|