Genesis 1 - A Commentary

Blah blah blah. You have yet to even make a rational argument. You don't even understand nor see how I harmonized the account. In terms of Scripture and real science, the harmonization is perfect. I also detailed it whereas you did tend to resort to commentary that was more philosophical than actually explaining what the verses actually mean. I also studied ancient exegesis which guided my understanding of the account. And my commentary is the best defense for God as Creator you're gonna find out there! The account not only reveals what was being created, but it also scientifically refutes evolution! This is because evolutionists don't know anything about planets or the solar system. They just wanna keep you fascinated by their Deep Space Fantasia. Evolutionist geology is the lowest point followed by their view that the sun came before the earth. The earth's core and magnetic field is the embarrassment here. But I only revealed what the account is saying. God is the one Who created it all. 

All I did is supply the missing link in Genesis 1:3. That's the only interpretation that is original to the exegesis. The early church fathers and ancient Jewish scholars did all the rest for me. They rightfully knew that Gen.1:4-5 is the earth's first spin as a living planet -- and yes, the earth is alive! God cannot use the earth to assist in His creation if the earth itself is not alive. Everybody knows the earth is alive. A dead planet is one who's core is dead. There are no active volcanoes on a dead planet. You can go to Mars and warm up up the planet and then plant seeds and nothing will grow. This is because the core on Mars is dead and thus there are no nutrients in the soil. 

No, yeah, I see how you "harmonized" the two...by beating down and misrepresenting actual science. As I've said.

But whatever, I think we'll have to agree to disagree here, because your criteria for evaluating science is not facts and data but your a prior conclusions.

Like..."the Earth is alive"...like Jupiter (which must be "more alive" than the earth).

Blah blah...blah. You know nothing about my vocal abilities. And my mind does not think like the American in terms of music. Anneke is not my only influence. I have hundreds of influences going back several decades. I know my abilities as a singer and songwriters so nothing you say has any weight. Its not for nothing I have contacts all over the world. I just don't care anymore about music. Have nothing more to do with the music industry. So insult someone who actually cares. 

And I can see why you made Mercy moderator here. He seems to agree with you about all things. 

But Jupiter has a magnetic field...stronger than Earth's.

You seemed to imply that was the indicator for the Earth being "alive."

I know that you linked to a bit of pretentious caterwauling on that Dragonstone cut.. If that wasn't up to European standards (whatever the f'k that is)why link it?



Understatement of the century.



Screeching tires, growling plumbing, and frantic throbbing are poor influences for music..



Sadly we too know your abilities as a singer and songwriter ..



It's for the best.



We certainly don't agree about all things however he respects reason. I'm happy he's here.

Establishing agreement on something like this would go a long way towards having a profitable conversation. Doesn't seem likely at this point, unfortunately.

Well I'd hate to burst your bubble but that free recording was done 8 years after I completely stopped singing and its still better than anything produced in America in almost 20 years! I sang to an out of tune guitar that had been tuned up during the recording because the guitarist involved in the project doesn't understand low tunings. You have to sing in key and give the stanzas what they ask for. Its an 80s metal song and I'm a European vocalist. I don't write that way and did not write the stanzas. I wrote the melody and 95% of the lyrics (though the lyrical direction was 100% Jerry). The song was not a studio cut either. I never use special effects. So what you hear is what I actually sang. Most singers today cannot sing anything you hear on the studio cut. You are clearly a very biased person with no training in vocals. The only thing we can agree on here is that the home recording is far from perfect. Its a song finished in the writing and that's all it is. Its also an 80s metal song and it started out being more mid 90s. 


i hate alternative. Vocal influences I can perfectly imitate are Geoff Tate (Queensryche), Messiah Marcolin (Candlemass), Warrel Dane (Sanctuary/Nevermore), Fabio Lione (Rhapsody), King Diamond, Freddy Mercury (Queen), Roy Khan (Kamelot), Gordan Lightfoot, Billy Joel, Paul McCartney, Frank Sinatra etc., etc.

You're just talk. Off the Internet I could destroy any champion you send against me. Americans are lazy and can't sing at all. Hasn't always been this way but its been bad since like 1993/1994 and even much worse now. The only reason why I don't go on American Idol and win is because I don't care anymore. I'm also not in my prime anymore. So talk to someone who cares or get your own recording out there and proof yourself. I already had my time and glad its over. 



The only thing you know is that I'm a Christian and you hate me. You have never heard a song I wrote at any time. Hardly anyone has. Americans don't write. They just talk. They are day dreamers who get nothing done. I hear talk from people like you all the time but you get nothing done and have nothing to show for your talk. 



Uneducated European vocalist. Hum? Well that proves how little you know the art of singing. You just like trashing talking. You would not talk this way in a rehearsal room. Nobody does. I can destroy anybody you know in a singing contest and I'm 50. You average vocalist is all washed up and can't sing at 35. I can destroy young American singers because they can't sing. They lack skill and emotion. They suck and that's science. 

The earth's spin begins with the core. Angular Momentum isn't how the earth began to spin. In fact, if what you say is true then Venus should rotate in the same direct. Venus' rotation is opposite to earth's rotation and Uranus spins on its side, rolling. So there you have it. An entire scientific theory refuted by oddities that shouldn't be if the theory is correct. All planets should obey the theory without exception. Angular momentum works only after the planet has already began to spin. Inertia happens after the planet begins to spin. Asteroids didn't cause earth to spin. The core churns and so does the planet. From there the moon's gravitation force slows down earth's rotation. As for the earth's orbit around the sun, the earth began to spin before the sun was created. But you atheists think the sun came first which is laughable 

Most geologists who are sober agree the core is what causes the earth to initiate its first spin. From there inertia and gravitation forces aid in the rest. 


Agreed. 



In the late heavy bombardment? Sounds like you are blaming asteroids. But regardless of what happened the core did die. But nobody knows what happened to Mars. I reject all theories.



No way. Not true. Without an active core absolutely nothing will ever grow again. That is basic geology 101. NASA also should know this and if they don't they are high. I understand volcanism real well. Mars does not have an active volcano which means the planet is dead and there are no nutrients in the dead, dry rocky lifeless soil on mars. Better get an engineer down there at the core to fix it if you want to ever see anything grow there again. But first you better figure out a safe way to heat up the planet with raising earth's temperature in the process! I know all about these terraforming pipe dreams about Mars. It will never work no matter how optimistic these evolutionists talk. It will never happen. The life of a planet is found in the active core. If the earth's core stopped we'd all die. That's just common sense geoscience everyone should know. 

Mars still rotates because of inertia. The famous redness is caused by ferric (iron) oxide, basically rust. If earth's atmosphere was blown into space by solar winds our planet would look a lot like Mars. Mars has polar ice caps, which grow and shrink visibly over the seasons. But the ice is comprised mainly of dry ice, or solid carbon dioxide. If earth's magnetic field was weak our atmosphere would be blown into space and all water on earth would be vaporized. Then dry ice would also be seen on our polar ice caps just as dry ice appears on Mars. You also have to realize that if earth's magnetic field was weak like Mars then we'd have it much worse off than Mars due to our position in the solar system being closer to the sun. 

Lastly, NASA scientists say there was a near global flood on Mars but deny the reality that there was a global Flood on earth.

So you think. You've never actually studied real operational science. You just follow theories and most all theories are false. Evolution teaches that the sun comes before the earth. Genesis says God created the earth before the sun. Genesis is scientifically spot on! If the sun first then say goodbye to water and early life-forms on earth because water cannot exist on an earth without a strong magnetic field. For decades evolutionists taught that the magnetic field was very weak and did not protect the earth until 500-million years ago. They had to quickly change their view after I released my commentary on Genesis. So now, since 2020, they say the magnetic field protected the earth from the start. They just make-it-all-up-as-they-go. But I did humiliate evolutionists with that little revelation about the magnetic field. Sun before earth scorches the earth to the point where no water can exist anywhere on the earth. At least God knew that sun before the earth was not a very smart idea which is why God, in His Perfect Knowledge, waited until the 4th Day before creating the sun. God allowed the magnetic field to develop and the earth to marinate, per se, in the absence of solar radiation. God created the earth to be inhabited. Therefore He took special care of the earth during creation.