petep
Legend
Posts: 25,958
Member is Online
|
Post by petep on Jul 3, 2020 17:55:40 GMT
Susan rice who promoted the lie that the brutal terrorist attack that killed Americans was just a flash mob response to a video.
And when the lie was exposed claimed
- she did not know who booked her on 5 Sunday shows - and did not know who have her the lie and false talking Points
That one?
|
|
RWB
Legend
Posts: 12,761
|
Post by RWB on Jul 3, 2020 20:34:47 GMT
Susan rice who promoted the lie that the brutal terrorist attack that killed Americans was just a flash mob response to a video. And when the lie was exposed claimed - she did not know who booked her on 5 Sunday shows - and did not know who have her the lie and false talking Points That one? Yup that's the one Greg said He'd Hit it
|
|
|
Post by Greg55_99 on Jul 4, 2020 1:21:44 GMT
Susan rice who promoted the lie that the brutal terrorist attack that killed Americans was just a flash mob response to a video. And when the lie was exposed claimed - she did not know who booked her on 5 Sunday shows - and did not know who have her the lie and false talking Points That one? Yup that's the one Greg said He'd Hit it And I would too! I'd take her to Red Lobster first. Greg
|
|
RWB
Legend
Posts: 12,761
|
Post by RWB on Jul 4, 2020 2:18:44 GMT
Yup that's the one Greg said He'd Hit it And I would too! I'd take her to Red Lobster first. Greg Damn Bro I figured a Pimp daddy like yourself would have a woman on each arm.
|
|
|
Post by crepe05 on Jul 4, 2020 12:18:44 GMT
A couple of tough ladies. Ready to take over if needed. Anybody else. Greg Baldwin may help in Wisconsin, but has little name recognition outside that state. Rice's scandal heavy baggage would sink the ticket.
As long as they aid the country by making sure that Creepy Joe never gets near the White House, I like them both.
I thought you'd be a Stacey Abrams fan, Greg.
|
|
AmericanMom
Participant
America loses when Leftist win
Posts: 135
|
Post by AmericanMom on Jul 4, 2020 13:02:36 GMT
While ol whitey Joe would probably be more comfortable with Elizabeth Warren on the ticket, his past voting record needs to be forgotten and the only way he can pass that off is by caving to the extreme left and bringing in a person of color..
But I am not 100% positive Harris is the one, I think she would weigh him down with her history ... Don't be surprised if his handlers don't pick a women at all.
|
|
|
Post by william on Jul 4, 2020 13:56:23 GMT
It's always so - wow - when the racists start explaining racism
|
|
RWB
Legend
Posts: 12,761
|
Post by RWB on Jul 4, 2020 15:42:07 GMT
It's always so - wow - when the racists start explaining racism well than quit trying to explain it you Racist Bastard.
|
|
Odysseus
Legend
Trump = Disaster
Posts: 41,101
|
Post by Odysseus on Jul 5, 2020 8:44:10 GMT
Racist White Bitch got it all backwards once again.
|
|
|
Post by william on Jul 5, 2020 9:41:59 GMT
It's always so - wow - when the racists start explaining racism well than quit trying to explain it you Racist Bastard. That's why I didn't try. Your ignorance is baffling.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 5, 2020 23:13:00 GMT
A couple of tough ladies. Ready to take over if needed. Anybody else. Greg Well, from a purely political angle, Trump would probably be delighted if Biden picked an open lesbian (Baldwin) for VP at a time when Trump's support from evangelicals has been dipping. Those among the "religious right" who have become tired enough of Trump's behavior to consider Biden are going to be put off by that choice. I'd be surprised to see him do that. I think Biden is counting on his "I'm a decent good ol' guy" image a bit too much to make the sexual orientation of his VP an issue in the main campaign season. I'd have to study Susan Rice more before commenting there, but I know she was involved with Benghazi. That's another issue I'm assuming Biden would prefer not to bring up. On that basis alone, it's tough seeing her as an asset. Biden needs to not only erode Trump's support, but bring them over to him. Picking someone many of them (rightly or wrongly) associate with what they consider to be Obama's biggest scandal doesn't make a lot of political sense. Keep in mind, I'm only talking about the political pros and cons here.
|
|
RWB
Legend
Posts: 12,761
|
Post by RWB on Jul 5, 2020 23:33:30 GMT
WHAT? Can't talk with your mouth full of shit.
|
|
Odysseus
Legend
Trump = Disaster
Posts: 41,101
|
Post by Odysseus on Jul 6, 2020 0:41:45 GMT
Biden's pick likely will be Kamala Harris.
1) She's black. Biden has proved he can work effectively with a black person.
2) She's a woman, obviously.
3) She's a senator from a very blue state. If Biden wins, the Democratic governor of California will appoint her replacement until an election is held, and it's pretty clear they won't be some conservative white supremacist.
4) If Biden should choose not to run for re-election, we'd have an excellent replacement in Harris.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 6, 2020 1:52:57 GMT
4) If Biden should choose not to run for re-election, we'd have an excellent replacement in Harris.
I've made this argument on LNF before, but historically speaking (and barring death or resignation), the VP position has proven to be a poor doorway through which to enter the presidency. Biden might pull it off. If so, he'll be the first guy in over 30 years to do it and he isn't going straight to the presidency from the vice-presidency, either.
|
|
Odysseus
Legend
Trump = Disaster
Posts: 41,101
|
Post by Odysseus on Jul 6, 2020 3:02:04 GMT
4) If Biden should choose not to run for re-election, we'd have an excellent replacement in Harris.
I've made this argument on LNF before, but historically speaking (and barring death or resignation), the VP position has proven to be a poor doorway through which to enter the presidency. Biden might pull it off. If so, he'll be the first guy in over 30 years to do it and he isn't going straight to the presidency from the vice-presidency, either.
Why bar death and resignation?
Including those not uncommon events, you are forgetting Tyler, Fillmore, A Johnson, Arthur, TR, Coolidge, Truman, Johnson, Ford, and GHW Bush.
And even if you want to bar death and resignation, you're still left with those former VP's who achieved election or re-election on their own: TR, Coolidge, Truman, Johnson, and GHW Bush.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 6, 2020 12:47:43 GMT
I've made this argument on LNF before, but historically speaking (and barring death or resignation), the VP position has proven to be a poor doorway through which to enter the presidency. Biden might pull it off. If so, he'll be the first guy in over 30 years to do it and he isn't going straight to the presidency from the vice-presidency, either.
Why bar death and resignation?
Including those not uncommon events, you are forgetting Tyler, Fillmore, A Johnson, Arthur, TR, Coolidge, Truman, Johnson, Ford, and GHW Bush.
And even if you want to bar death and resignation, you're still left with those former VP's who achieved election or re-election on their own: TR, Coolidge, Truman, Johnson, and GHW Bush.
I barred death and resignation because you seemed to be exempting those options in your example of Biden "choos(ing) not to run again." Dead men literally don't get a choice and a guy that resigned almost certainly won't be allowed the choice in any practical sense. Had you said "should Biden choose not to finish his term," that's different. And if you were including that as part of "choosing not to run," then of course I concede the point. Obviously the ratio of incumbent VPs making it to the White House when the office of president is vacant is 1:1. There's no other option. Otherwise, I stand by my statement. Incumbent VPs do not have a good track record of getting to the White House via election.
PS It's not just getting there that's the issue. It's having a successful presidency. Consider the past several VP's who actually made it to the White House by whatever means: Bush: Lost re-election Ford: Lost election Nixon: Resigned (not to mention he lost his attempt to go directly from the VP spot to the White House) LBJ: Chose not to run for a full second term due to severe unpopularity Truman: Won election, but decided not to run for another term to which he was entitled. Poor polling numbers was one of the reasons (although I'll grant that age and health were others). And of all those men, Bush is the only one who got elected to the presidency as an incumbent vice president. There's a reason a lot of people who have presidential aspirations either think twice about accepting the vice-presidency or outright refuse it when offered to them. Historically, most VPs never get to the White House and for those that did, you have to go back to at least Truman* (if you want to count him) or Coolidge* to find someone who chose not to run again for another term to which he was eligible for reasons having little to do with poor popularity. *Technically, Truman and all previous presidents could have run for as many terms as they wished, so obviously they were eventually going to either choose not to run or die in office. Their reasons for choosing not to run then become a factor.
Given that the Democrats lost the White House after Truman, but the Republicans kept it after Coolidge, I think we can safely say that popularity was not a factor for the latter.
|
|
Odysseus
Legend
Trump = Disaster
Posts: 41,101
|
Post by Odysseus on Jul 6, 2020 19:04:04 GMT
Don't be so picayune.
|
|